THE EVALUATION OF THE APPLICANT STATUS OF THE COMMERCIAL COMPANY PARTNERS FOR PROTECTING THE PROPERTY ASSETS RIGHTS WITHIN THE CONTENT OF EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION AND THE REMOVAL THEORY OF THE CORPORATE ENTITY CURTAIN
Abstract
The European Human Rights Court has accepted the shareholders instead of the
company itself during some decrees when the commercial company has in fact suffered.
In the Code of Companies. This is nothing else but to remove or to slightly open the door
of the corporate entity curtain. Said court permits this procedure as an exceptionduring
interventions against property rights. However, the recognition of applicant status to the
shareholder should not be evaluated as an extension of a sufferer condition or an unjust
treatment status through removal of the corporate entity curtain. The recognition of
applicant status to the shareholders by the European Human Rights Court under conditions when the commercial company shareholders induce indirect losses and therefore said court
has a significant function in efficient protection of the rights which are granted by
European Human Rights Court and the protocol issued in Annex 1.
Keywords
References
- Carrs- Frisk, Monica, Mülkiyet Hakkı, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi'nin 1 No'lu Protokolünün 1. Maddesinin Uygulanmasına İlişkin Kılavuz, TBB Yayınları, Ankara 2005.
- Dinç Güney, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Malvarlığı Hakları, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları 124, Ankara 2007.
- Dinç Güney, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, İzmir Barosu Yayınları, İzmir 2006.
- Emberland Marius, “The Corporate Veil in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights”, ZaöRV 63 (2003), s. 945.
- Gemalmaz H. Burak, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinde Mülkiyet Hakkı, İstanbul 2009.
- Gözlügöl Said Vakkas, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve İç Hukukumuza Etkisi, Ankara 2002.
- Kervankıran Emrullah, “Sermaye Ortaklıklarında Sınırlı Sorumluluk İlkesine Karşı Önemli Bir İstisna: Tüzel Kişilik Perdesinin Kaldırılması”, EÜHFD, C. XI, S. 3–4 (2007), 453.
- Kırca İsmail, Şehirali Çelik, Feyzan Hayal, Manavgat Çağlar, Anonim Şirketler Hukuku, C. 1, Ankara 2013.