Research Article

Understanding Iran-Hamas Relations from a Defensive Neo-Realist Approach

Volume: 4 Number: 2 December 31, 2020
EN TR

Understanding Iran-Hamas Relations from a Defensive Neo-Realist Approach

Abstract

This paper aims at understanding the dynamics behind the Iranian support for the Sunni Palestinian group Hamas by analyzing the mutual relations from a defensive neo-realist approach. The paper begins with a historical overview of Iran-Hamas relations and the periods that saw these relations being improved or deteriorated. It then addresses the defensive neo-realist approach in terms of the basic ideas proposed by Kenneth Waltz, the founder of the theory of neo-realism, and the differences between his view and the offensive approach suggested by John Mearsheimer and others. The third part of the paper examines the defensive neo-realist analysis on the relation between states and non-state actors by testing Iran as an inspector for soft power in the Sunni-majority region, and, the probable threat that can be defended by this relation. It also deals with the difficulties averting Iran from becoming the sole hegemon in the region and how Iran takes advantage of this relationship to maintain a dominant role in the Middle East and how the latest rapprochement between two Gulf countries and Israel would contribute to consolidate that relation.

Keywords

Iran , Hamas , Neo-Realism , Defensive Realism , Soft Power

References

  1. Dunne, Tim & Kurki, Milja & Smith, Steve. International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford University Press, third edition, 2013.
  2. Ghazi J., Widad. “The Iranian position of the Palestinian parties: Hamas movement as a model.” Al-Mustansiriya Journal of Arab and International Studies, 17 (2020): 1-28.
  3. Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.
  4. Rudloff, Peter. “Offensive Realism, Defensive Realism, and the Role of Constraints”. The Midsouth Political Science Review 14 (2013): 45-77.
  5. Snyder, Jack. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
  6. Trevino, Rusty. “Is Iran Offensive or Defensive Realist, “A Theoretical Reflection on Iranian Motives of Creating Instability,” Journal of Strategic Security 5, no. 6 (2013): 382-392.
  7. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw Hill, 1979.
  8. "Iran nuclear: Fire at Natanz plant 'caused by sabotage.” BBC, August 23, 2020, accessed: Sept. 18, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53884701.
  9. “1992’s Mass Deportation of Hamas Members,” Maan News Agency, Dec, 21, 2010, accessed: April 2, 2020, http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=214068.
  10. “A look back: Iran-Hamas relations throughout history,” Qpost News, Jan. 3, 2020, accessed: Sept. 5, 2020, https://www.qposts.com/37326-2/.
APA
Abo Rezeg, A. (2020). Understanding Iran-Hamas Relations from a Defensive Neo-Realist Approach. İran Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 385-409. https://doi.org/10.33201/iranian.760658