Translation
BibTex RIS Cite

Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni

Year 2019, , 79 - 111, 20.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.644409

Abstract

Bu çalışma, karşılaştırmalı hukukun tarihsel gelişimini ele aldıktan sonra, klasik karşılaştırmalı hukukun nasıl ¨eskiyi¨ anlattığını tartışacaktır. Sonrasında; dinamik sistemlere, düzenlere, normatif yapılara, melezliklere ve içeriklere yani “yeniye” eğilerek günümüz karşılaştırmalı hukuk anlayışının ufkunu aşan multidisipliner yaklaşımları inceleyecektir. Bu bağlamda, bu makale ilgili postmodern gelişmelerde kullanılan metodolojinin derin karşılaştırmalı araştırma, eleştirel karşılaştırmalı araştırma, sosyo-hukuki metodoloji, küresel karşılaştırmalı hukuk ve son olarak sayısal analiz gibi alanlara doğru nasıl genişlediğini inceleyecektir. Dolaylı karşılaştırmalı hukuku da dikkate aldığımızda şu soruyu irdeleyeceğiz: Bu noktadan itibaren nereye yöneliyoruz?

References

  • Adam and Bomhoff, Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (n. 12).
  • Andrew Harding and Esin Orucu (eds), Comparative Law in the 21st Century (London: Kluwer Law International, 2002).
  • Annelise Riles (ed), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (Oxford, 2001). Catherine Valcke, ¨Comparative Law as Comparative Jurisprudence – The Comparability of Legal Systems¨ (2004) 52 AJCL 713-740.
  • Catherine Valcke, ¨Reflections on Comparative Law Methodology – Getting Inside Contract Law¨ in Maurice Adams and Jacco Bomhoff (eds), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) pp. 22-48.
  • David Clark (ed), Comparative Law and Society (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
  • Duncan Kennedy, ¨Political Ideology and Comparative Law¨ in Mauro Bussani and Ugo Mattei (eds), Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) pp. 35-56.
  • Esin Orucu “Comparative Law” in Stanley N. Katz (editor-in-chief) The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History (New York: Oxford University Press, Vol 2, 2009) pp. 97-100. Esin Orucu, Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the 21st Century (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).
  • Esin Orucu and David Nelken (eds), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).
  • Geoffrey Samuel, ¨Form, Structure and Content in Comparative Law¨ in Eleanor Cashin Ritaine et al. (eds), Legal Engineering and Comparative Law (Zurich: Schulthess, 2009) pp. 22-50.
  • Gunter Frankenberg, ¨Critical Comparisons: Rethinking Comparative Law¨ (1985) 26 Harv Intern LJ 411-455.
  • Harold C. Gutteridge, Comparative Law – An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research (Cambridge 2nd ed. 1949, London 1974 reprint) Ch. II, pp. 11-22.
  • Jaakko Husa, ¨Farewell to Functionalism or Methodological Tolerance?¨ (2003) 67 Rabels Zeitschrift für auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht 446.
  • Jaakko Husa, A New Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).
  • Jan Smits (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2nd ed., 2012, 2014 paperback).
  • John Bell, ¨Reflections on Continental European Supreme Courts¨ in Guy Canivet, Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve (eds), Independence, Accountability and the Judiciary (London: BIICL, 2006) pp. 253-263.
  • Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz, “The History of Comparative Law”, An Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford: T. Weir translation, 3rd ed., 1998) Ch. 4, pp. 48-62.
  • M Schmitthoff, ¨The Science of Comparative Law¨ (1939) 7 The Cambridge Law Journal 94-110.
  • Mark Van Hoecke, ¨Deep Level Comparative Law¨ in Mark Van Hoecke (ed), Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004) pp. 165-195.
  • Mary Ann Glendon, Paolo Carozza and Colin Picker (eds), Comparative Legal Traditions in a Nutshell (St Paul: 3rd ed., 2008).
  • Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
  • Mathias Siems, Comparative Law (Law in Context Series) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) p. 114.
  • Mauro Bussani and Ugo Mattei (eds), Making European Law: Essays on the Common Core Project (Trento: Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Guiridiche, 2000).
  • Michael Bogdan, Comparative Law (Göteborg: Kluwer Tano, 1994) p.58. Nicola Lupo and Lucia Scaffardi (eds), Comparative Law in Legislative Drafting: The Increasing Importance of Dialogue amongst Parliaments (Eleven International Publishing, 2014.
  • Peter de Cruz, Comparative Law in a Changing World, (London: Routhledge-Cavendish, 3rd ed., 2007).
  • Pier Guiseppi Monateri (ed), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
  • Pierre Legrand, Fragments on Law-as-Culture (Deventer: Willink, 1999). Pierre Legrand and Roderick Munday (eds), Comparatuve Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
  • Rene David, Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (London: Stevens, John Brierley translation, 3rd ed., 1985).
  • Richard Hyland, Gifts: A Study in Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
  • Rudolf Schlesinger (ed), Formation of Contract: A Study of the Common Core of Legal Systems, (Dobbs Ferry: Oceania Publications, 1968).
  • Ugo Mattei, Teemu Ruskola and Antonio Gidi (eds), Schlesinger’s Comparative law: Cases – Texts - Materials (Foundation Press, 7th ed., 2009).
  • Vivian Grosswald Curran, ¨Cultural Immersion, Difference and Categories in U.S. Comparative Law¨ (1998) 46 AJCL 657-668.
  • Walter Hug, “The History of Comparative Law”, (1931-32) 45 Harv L Rev 1027-1070.
  • Werner Menski, Comparative Law in a Global Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2006).
  • William Butler, Oleksiy Kresin and IS Shemshuchenko (eds), Foundations of Comparative Law: Methods and Typologies (Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, 2011).

Something Old, Something New in Comparative Law

Year 2019, , 79 - 111, 20.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.644409

Abstract

After considering the historical development of comparative law, this paper will discuss what classical comparative law provided for an understanding: the old. It will then look into multi-disciplinary approaches that have crossed the horizon of modern day comparative law looking at dynamic systems, orders, normativities, hybridities and contexts: the new. In this context, the paper will consider the extension of methodology in these postmodern developments: deeplevel comparative research, critical comparative research, socio-legal methodology, global comparative law and finally numerical analysis. Considering also implicit comparative law, the question will be: where do we go from here?

References

  • Adam and Bomhoff, Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (n. 12).
  • Andrew Harding and Esin Orucu (eds), Comparative Law in the 21st Century (London: Kluwer Law International, 2002).
  • Annelise Riles (ed), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (Oxford, 2001). Catherine Valcke, ¨Comparative Law as Comparative Jurisprudence – The Comparability of Legal Systems¨ (2004) 52 AJCL 713-740.
  • Catherine Valcke, ¨Reflections on Comparative Law Methodology – Getting Inside Contract Law¨ in Maurice Adams and Jacco Bomhoff (eds), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) pp. 22-48.
  • David Clark (ed), Comparative Law and Society (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
  • Duncan Kennedy, ¨Political Ideology and Comparative Law¨ in Mauro Bussani and Ugo Mattei (eds), Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) pp. 35-56.
  • Esin Orucu “Comparative Law” in Stanley N. Katz (editor-in-chief) The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History (New York: Oxford University Press, Vol 2, 2009) pp. 97-100. Esin Orucu, Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the 21st Century (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004).
  • Esin Orucu and David Nelken (eds), Comparative Law: A Handbook (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).
  • Geoffrey Samuel, ¨Form, Structure and Content in Comparative Law¨ in Eleanor Cashin Ritaine et al. (eds), Legal Engineering and Comparative Law (Zurich: Schulthess, 2009) pp. 22-50.
  • Gunter Frankenberg, ¨Critical Comparisons: Rethinking Comparative Law¨ (1985) 26 Harv Intern LJ 411-455.
  • Harold C. Gutteridge, Comparative Law – An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research (Cambridge 2nd ed. 1949, London 1974 reprint) Ch. II, pp. 11-22.
  • Jaakko Husa, ¨Farewell to Functionalism or Methodological Tolerance?¨ (2003) 67 Rabels Zeitschrift für auslandisches und internationales Privatrecht 446.
  • Jaakko Husa, A New Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015).
  • Jan Smits (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2nd ed., 2012, 2014 paperback).
  • John Bell, ¨Reflections on Continental European Supreme Courts¨ in Guy Canivet, Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve (eds), Independence, Accountability and the Judiciary (London: BIICL, 2006) pp. 253-263.
  • Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kötz, “The History of Comparative Law”, An Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford: T. Weir translation, 3rd ed., 1998) Ch. 4, pp. 48-62.
  • M Schmitthoff, ¨The Science of Comparative Law¨ (1939) 7 The Cambridge Law Journal 94-110.
  • Mark Van Hoecke, ¨Deep Level Comparative Law¨ in Mark Van Hoecke (ed), Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004) pp. 165-195.
  • Mary Ann Glendon, Paolo Carozza and Colin Picker (eds), Comparative Legal Traditions in a Nutshell (St Paul: 3rd ed., 2008).
  • Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
  • Mathias Siems, Comparative Law (Law in Context Series) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) p. 114.
  • Mauro Bussani and Ugo Mattei (eds), Making European Law: Essays on the Common Core Project (Trento: Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Guiridiche, 2000).
  • Michael Bogdan, Comparative Law (Göteborg: Kluwer Tano, 1994) p.58. Nicola Lupo and Lucia Scaffardi (eds), Comparative Law in Legislative Drafting: The Increasing Importance of Dialogue amongst Parliaments (Eleven International Publishing, 2014.
  • Peter de Cruz, Comparative Law in a Changing World, (London: Routhledge-Cavendish, 3rd ed., 2007).
  • Pier Guiseppi Monateri (ed), Methods of Comparative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
  • Pierre Legrand, Fragments on Law-as-Culture (Deventer: Willink, 1999). Pierre Legrand and Roderick Munday (eds), Comparatuve Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
  • Rene David, Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (London: Stevens, John Brierley translation, 3rd ed., 1985).
  • Richard Hyland, Gifts: A Study in Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
  • Rudolf Schlesinger (ed), Formation of Contract: A Study of the Common Core of Legal Systems, (Dobbs Ferry: Oceania Publications, 1968).
  • Ugo Mattei, Teemu Ruskola and Antonio Gidi (eds), Schlesinger’s Comparative law: Cases – Texts - Materials (Foundation Press, 7th ed., 2009).
  • Vivian Grosswald Curran, ¨Cultural Immersion, Difference and Categories in U.S. Comparative Law¨ (1998) 46 AJCL 657-668.
  • Walter Hug, “The History of Comparative Law”, (1931-32) 45 Harv L Rev 1027-1070.
  • Werner Menski, Comparative Law in a Global Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2006).
  • William Butler, Oleksiy Kresin and IS Shemshuchenko (eds), Foundations of Comparative Law: Methods and Typologies (Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, 2011).
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Law in Context
Journal Section ÇEVİRİ
Authors

Esin Örücü This is me 0000-0002-1425-2407

Translators

Nurcan Yılmaz Özel This is me

Publication Date June 20, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Örücü, E. (2019). Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni (N. Yılmaz Özel, Trans.). İdare Hukuku Ve İlimleri Dergisi, 18(1), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.644409
AMA Örücü E. Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni. İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi. June 2019;18(1):79-111. doi:10.26650/ihid.644409
Chicago Örücü, Esin. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski Ve Yeni”. Translated by Nurcan Yılmaz Özel. İdare Hukuku Ve İlimleri Dergisi 18, no. 1 (June 2019): 79-111. https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.644409.
EndNote Örücü E (June 1, 2019) Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni. İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi 18 1 79–111.
IEEE E. Örücü, “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni”, İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 79–111, 2019, doi: 10.26650/ihid.644409.
ISNAD Örücü, Esin. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski Ve Yeni”. İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi. Nurcan Yılmaz ÖzelTrans 18/1 (June 2019), 79-111. https://doi.org/10.26650/ihid.644409.
JAMA Örücü E. Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni. İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi. 2019;18:79–111.
MLA Örücü, Esin. “Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski Ve Yeni”. İdare Hukuku Ve İlimleri Dergisi, translated by Nurcan Yılmaz Özel, vol. 18, no. 1, 2019, pp. 79-111, doi:10.26650/ihid.644409.
Vancouver Örücü E. Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Eski ve Yeni. İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi. 2019;18(1):79-111.