Mavi Yakalı Çalışanların İşyerinde Yapay Zekaya Yönelik Tutumlarını Şekillendiren Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar ve Kültürel Bağlamlar

Year 2025, Volume: 45 Issue: 3, 394 - 412, 22.12.2025

Emily Cook , Tory De Bassio

https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2025-1710485

https://izlik.org/JA24HG93NR

Abstract

Bu çalışma, mavi yakalı çalışanlar arasında psikolojik ihtiyaçlar, ulusal kültürel değerler ve yapay zekaya (YZ) yönelik iyimserlik arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemiştir. Mavi yakalı çalışanlar, işlerinin rutin ve manuel niteliği nedeniyle otomasyona özgün bir biçimde maruz kalmalarına rağmen, onların bakış açıları araştırmalarda yeterince temsil edilmemektedir. Üretim, lojistik ve hizmet sektörlerinde YZ kullanımının hızla artmasıyla birlikte bu dönüşüm beceri gereksinimlerini yeniden tanımlamakta ve çalışanların geleceğe ilişkin algıladıkları fırsatları etkilemektedir; bu sebeple psikolojik ihtiyaçların çalışanların beklentilerini nasıl şekillendirdiğini anlamak giderek daha önemli hale gelmektedir. Mevcut çalışma kapsamında, 11 ülkeden 2.200 çalışanla kesitsel bir araştırma yürütülmüştür. Veri toplama araçları yetkinlik, ilişkisellik ve işyerinde karar alma süreçlerinde söz hakkına sahip olmaya ilişkin göstergelerin yanı sıra, YZ’nin bireysel kariyer ve sektör genelindeki etkilerine yönelik iyimserliği ölçen ölçekleri içermektedir. Ayrıca kültürün düzenleyici etkisi, Hofstede’in bireyselcilik endeksi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, teknolojik uyuma ilişkin psikolojik süreçlerin bireysel ve kolektif düzeyde farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Algılanan yetkinlik, kişisel kariyer beklentilerine yönelik iyimserliğin en güçlü yordayıcısı olurken, hem yetkinlik hem de ilişkisellik YZ’nin sektör genelindeki etkilerine ilişkin iyimserliği yordamaktadır. İlişkisellik ile sektör düzeyindeki iyimserlik arasındaki pozitif ilişkinin, bireyselcilik düzeyi düşük ülkelerde daha güçlü olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuç kolektivizme yönelik kültürel eğilimlerin, sektörel dönüşüme ilişkin beklentileri şekillendirmede toplumsal bağlantıların rolünü güçlendirdiğini göstermektedir. Söz hakkı değişkeni ise her iki düzeyde de iyimserlikle anlamlı bir ilişki göstermemiştir. Bulgular, teknolojik dönüşümün bireysel ve kolektif boyutlarında yetkinlik ve ilişkiselliğin birbirinden ayrışan roller oynadığını ve ilişkiselliğin sektör düzeyindeki iyimserlik üzerindeki etkisini kültürel değerlerin ölçülü biçimde şekillendirdiğini ortaya koyarak öz belirleme kuramını genişletmektedir. Bu sonuçlar, motivasyonel ve kültürel faktörlerin, mavi yakalı çalışanların otomasyon ve YZ’ye ilişkin beklentilerini birlikte belirlediğine dair uluslararası düzeyde kanıt sunmaktadır.

Keywords

Mavi yakalı çalışanlar , yapay zeka , öz belirleme kuramı , dijital değişim , kültürlerarası karşılaştırma

Psychological Needs and Cultural Contexts Shaping BlueCollar Workers’ Attitudes Toward AI at Work

https://izlik.org/JA24HG93NR

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between psychological needs, national cultural values, and optimism about artificial intelligence (AI) among blue-collar workers. Blue-collar workers face distinctive exposure to automation due to the routine and manual demands of their jobs, yet their perspectives remain underrepresented in research. Understanding how psychological needs shape their expectations is increasingly important as AI adoption accelerates across manufacturing, logistics, and service sectors, reshaping skill requirements and influencing workers’ perceived future opportunities. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 2,200 employees across 11 countries. The survey included indicators of competence, relatedness, and voice in workplace decision-making, with measures of optimism regarding AI’s impact on individual careers and industry. Cultural moderation was assessed using Hofstede’s individualism index. The results revealed differentiated psychological mechanisms across individual and collective domains of technological adaptation. Perceived competence was the strongest predictor of optimism about personal career prospects, while both competence and relatedness predicted optimism about AI’s broader industry impact. The positive association between relatedness and industry optimism was stronger in countries with lower individualism, suggesting that cultural orientations toward collectivism amplify the role of social connection in shaping expectations about sectoral change. Voice showed no significant relationship with optimism in either domain. These findings extend self-determination theory by demonstrating that competence and relatedness play distinct roles across the individual and collective domains of technological change, with cultural values moderating the influence of relatedness on industry-level optimism. The results provide cross-national evidence that motivational and cultural factors jointly shape blue-collar workers’ expectations about automation and AI.

Keywords

Blue-collar employees , artificial intelligence , self-determination theory , digital change , cross-cultural comparison

References

• Abhari, K. (2025). Employee participation in digital transformation: From digitalization sentiment to transformation predisposition. Information & Management, 62(8), 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104212 google scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectlves, 33(2), 3-30. https://doi.Org/l0.1257/jep.33.2.3 google scholar
• Altreiter, C., & Flecker, J. (2020). ‘l get money for what l like doing best’: The class origin of young blue-collar workers and their commitment to work. Work, Employment and Soclety, 34(6), 1097-1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020916189 google scholar
• Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, 0. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadershlp Quarterly, 25(3), 487-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009 google scholar
• Anton, J., Fernândez-Macîas, E., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2023). Does robotization affect job quality? Evidence from European regional labor markets. Industrlal Relatlons: A Journal of Economy and Soclety, 62(3), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12324 google scholar
• Armstrong, B., Chen, V. K., Cuellar, A., Forsey-Smerek, A., & Shah, J. A. (2024). Automatlon from the worker’s perspectlve (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXlV.2409.20387 google scholar
• Arora, N., & Garg, N. (2024). Meaningful work in the digital age- A comprehensive review and framework. Human Resource Development Internatlonal, 28(2), 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2336866 google scholar
• Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economlcs, 118(4), 1279-1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801 google scholar
• Aziz, M. F., Rajesh, J. l., Jahan, F., McMurrray, A., Ahmed, N., Narendran, R., & Harrison, C. (2025). Al-powered leadership: A systematic literature review. Journal of Managerlal Psychology, 40(5), 604-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2024-0389 google scholar
• Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). lntrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applled Soclal Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x google scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health PsYchologY, 22 (3), 273-285. https://doi.org/l0.1037/ocp0000056 google scholar
• Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2021). Ethical Al at work: The social contract for artificial intelligence and its implications for the workplace psychological contract. ln M. Coetzee & A. Deas (Eds.), Redefining the psYchological contract in the digital era (pp. 55-72). Springer lnternational Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_4 google scholar
• Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (Al) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(4), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7 google scholar
• Barley, S. R., Bechky, B. A., & Milliken, F. J. (2017). The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. AcademY of Management Discoveries, 3(2), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0034 google scholar
• Bergdahl, J., Latikka, R., Celuch, M., Savolainen, l., Soares Mantere, E., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023). Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 82, 102013. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013 google scholar
• Bessen, J., Goos, M., Salomons, A., & Van Den Berge, W. (2020). Firm-level automation: Evidence from the Netherlands. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 389-393. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201004 google scholar
• Blanka, C., Krumay, B., & Rueckel, D. (2022). The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575 google scholar
• Bonekamp, L., & Sure, M. (2015). Consequences of industry 4.0 on human labour and work organisation. Journal of Business and Media PsYchologY, 1(33-40). google scholar
• Breaugh, J. (2021). Too stressed to be engaged? The role of basic needs satisfaction in understanding work stress and public sector engagement. Public Personnel Management, 50(1), 84-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020912516 google scholar
• Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., Leung, K., Bierbrauer, G., Gomez, C., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social PsYchologY, 37(4), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1451 google scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperitY in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
• Chan, C. M. L., Tan, J., Billett, S., & Chong, W. H. (2025). Blue-collar workers adaptation to digitalization: A career construction theorY analYsis. Paper presented at the 58th Hawaii lnternational Conference on System Sciences, University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA. google scholar
• Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Locke, K. D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., De Jesûs Vargas-Flores, J., Ibânez-Reyes, J., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Curtis, G. J., Cabrera, H. F., Mastor, K. A., Alvarez, J. M., Ortiz, F. A., Simon, J.-Y. R., & Ching, C. M. (2013). Need satisfaction and well-being: Testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural PsYchologY, 44(4), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022022112466590 google scholar
• Country Comparison Tool. (n.d.). The culture factor. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool google scholar
• Cunningham, C. E., Woodward, C. A., Shannon, H. S., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., & Brown, J. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsYchologY, 75(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119637 google scholar
• Dedahanov, A. T., Rhee, C., & Gapurjanova, N. (2019). Job autonomy and employee voice: Is work-related self-efficacy a missing link? Management Decision, 57(9), 2401-2413. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2017-0607 google scholar
• Dîaz-Carrion, R., Navajas-Romero, V., & Casas-Rosal, J. C. (2020). Comparing working conditions and job satisfaction in hospitality workers across Europe. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102631 google scholar
• Dolbier, C. L., Webster, J. A., McCalister, K. T., Mallon, M. W., & Steinhardt, M. A. (2005). Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(3), 194-198. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.194 google scholar
• Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392. google scholar
• Ebrahimpour, D. (2025). The future of blue-collar work: AI, automation, and the urgent need for policy action. AI Policy Group. https:// www.aipolicygroup.ca/think-pieces/the-future-of-blue-collar-work-ai-automation-and-the-urgent-need-for-policy-action google scholar
• European Commission. (2022). Digital economY and societY index (DESI) 2022. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa. eu/en/policies/desi google scholar
• Farndale, E., & Murrer, I. (2015). Job resources and employee engagement: A cross-national study. Journal of Managerial PsYchologY, 30(5), 610-626. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2013-0318 google scholar
• Felten, E., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal, 42(12), 2195-2217. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3286 google scholar
• Fleischmann, C., Cardon, P., & Aritz, J. (2020, January 7). Smart collaboration in global virtual teams: The influence of culture on technology acceptance and communication effectiveness [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 363-372). Maui, Hl, United States. google scholar
• Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 google scholar
• Gallie, D., Felstead, A., Green, F., & lnanc, H. (2017). The hidden face of job insecurity. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 36-53. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0950017015624399 google scholar
• Gao, A., & Jiang, J. (2019). Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: The moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01484 google scholar
• Gödöllei, A. F., & Beck, J. W. (2023). lnsecure or optimistic? Employees’ diverging appraisals of automation, and consequences for job attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100342 google scholar
• Gomez-Baya, D., & Lucia-Casademunt, A. M. (2018). A self-determination theory approach to health and well-being in the workplace: Results from the sixth European working conditions survey in Spain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 269-283. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12511 google scholar
• Gupta, M., Parra, C. M., & Dennehy, D. (2022). Questioning racial and gender bias in ai-based recommendations: Do espoused national cultural values matter? Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1465-1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10156-2 google scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066332 google scholar
• Hirschi, A. (2014). Hope as a resource for self-directed career management: lnvestigating mediating effects on proactive career behaviors and life and job satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1495-1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9488-x google scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https:// doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 google scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. google scholar
• Hötte, K., Somers, M., & Theodorakopoulos, A. (2023). Technology and jobs: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122750 google scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications. google scholar
• Höyng, M., & Lau, A. (2023). Being ready for digital transformation: How to enhance employees’ intentional digital readiness. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100314 google scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101 google scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
• Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books. google scholar
• Kim, T.-Y., & Leung, K. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004 google scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incor-porating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320. https://doi.org/10.1057/ palgrave.jibs.8400202 google scholar
• Kruyen, P. M., & Sowa, J. E. (2023). Essential but ignored: lncluding blue-collar government workers into human resource management research. Public Personnel Management, 52(4), 521-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231187540 google scholar
• Lane, M. (2024). Who will be the workers most affected by Al? A closer look at the impact of Al on women, low-skilled workers and other groups. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers (No. 26). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/14dc6f89-en google scholar
• Lewis, S. C., Markowitz, D. M., & Bunquin, J. B. A. (2025). Journalists, emotions, and the introduction of generative ai chatbots: A large-scale analysis of tweets before and after the launch of Chatgpt. Social Media + Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251325597 google scholar
• Martela, F., & Riekki, T. J. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157 google scholar
• Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: lntegration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 google scholar
• Morton, J., Wilson, A. D., & Cooke, L. (2020). The digital work of strategists: Using open strategy for organizational transformation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2), 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101613 google scholar
• NallpaY, M. J. N., King, R. B., & Cai, Y. (2020). Autonomy is equally important across East and West: Testing the cross-cultural universality of self-determination theory. Journal of Adolescence, 78(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.adolescence.2019.12.009 google scholar
• Nguyen, T., & Elbanna, A. (2025). Understanding human-Al augmentation in the workplace: A review and a future research agenda. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10591-5 google scholar
• Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550 google scholar
• Potnuru, R. K. G., Sharma, R., & Sahoo, C. K. (2023). Employee voice, employee involvement, and organizational change readiness: Medi-ating role of commitment-to-change and moderating role of transformational leadership. Business Perspectives and Research, 11(3), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337211043962 google scholar
• Qi, W., Pan, J., Lyu, H., & Luo, J. (2024). Excitements and concerns in the post-ChatGPT era: Deciphering public perception of Al through social media analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 92, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158 google scholar
• Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Hofstede and Shane revisited: The role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111423898 google scholar
• Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures lnventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271 google scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 google scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. google scholar
• Saari, T., Leinonen, M., & Tapanila, K. (2021). Sources of meaningful work for blue-collar workers. Social Sciences, 11(1), 2. https://doi. org/10.3390/socsci11010002 google scholar
• Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011 google scholar
• Sheehan, A., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2023). Making Meaning from the digitalization of blue-collar work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610194 google scholar
• Snell, D., & Gekara, V. (2023). Re-examining technology’s destruction of blue-collar work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(3), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12259 google scholar
• Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 679-704. https:// doi.org/10.2307/25148745 google scholar
• Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405-439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938 google scholar
• Toshav-Eichner, N., & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2022). Yesterday’s workers in Tomorrow’s world. Personnel Review, 51(5), 1553-1569. https:// doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2020-0088 google scholar
• Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., & Van Der Werff, L. (2023). Smart tech is all around us - Bridging employee vulnerability with organizational active trust-building. Journal of Management Studies, joms.12940. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12940 google scholar
• Wong, S. l., Fieseler, C., & Kost, D. (2020). Digital labourers’ proactivity and the venture for meaningful work: Fruitful or fruitless? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 887-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12317 google scholar
• Woodruff, A., Shelby, R., Kelley, P. G., Rousso-Schindler, S., Smith-Loud, J., & Wilcox, L. (2024). How knowledge workers think generative Al will (not) transform their industries. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-26. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642700 google scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ google scholar
• Yang, L.Q., Spector, P. E., Sanchez, J. l., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L., Lapierre, L. M., O’Driscoll, M. P., Abarca, N., Alexandrova, M., Antoniou, A.S., Beham, B., Brough, P., Çarikçi, I., Ferreiro, P., Fraile, G., Geurts, S., Kinnunen, U., Lu, C., ... Woo, J.M. (2012). Individ-ualism-collectivism as a moderator of the work demands-strains relationship: A cross-level and cross-national examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 424-443. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.58 google scholar
• Yu, S., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Maeda, Y. (2018). General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis of studies in the us and East Asia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1863-1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9898-2 google scholar