.

Year 2019, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 25 - 39, 30.06.2019

Alexander Gofman

Abstract

.

Keywords

.

Tradition, Morality and Solidarity in Durkheim’s Theory

Abstract

This article examines Durkheim’s approach to the interrelationship of tradition, morality and solidarity. One of its basic claims is that Durkheim was an epistemological and methodological rationalist, but not an ontological one. It means that he grounded rational and scientific knowledge about social reality, which itself, to his mind, is not rational. It concerns directly his treatment of tradition, morality and social solidarity. In spite of all Durkheim’s statements about the decline of traditionalism in contemporary societies, he affirmed sometimes that traditional behaviour in general is almost identical to a moral one. We can see it namely in his reasoning about the close affinity and nearly identical character between “collective habits” and true morality. In industrial societies, according to him, two types of traditions coexist, namely old, “traditional” traditions inherited from the past on the one hand, and new, “rational” traditions, on the other hand. His statements about the alternation of historical periods dominated by traditions and ideals contains a kind of sketch on the philosophy of history, partly explaining the phenomena of time compression and time distension in different periods of social development. Durkheimian theory may be interpreted as a fruitful contribution to the present-day understanding of the processes of modernization.

Keywords

Tradition, Morality, Solidarity, Rules, Emile Durkheim

References

• Besnard, P. (1987). L’Anomie. Ses usages et ses fonctions dans la discipline sociologique depuis Durkheim. Paris : PUF.
• Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe (Ill.): The Free Press.
• Durkheim, E. (1965). Sociology and philosophy (D. F. Pocock, Trans.). London: Cohen &West.
• Durkheim, É. (1975). La sociologie et son domaine scientifique (1900). In V. Karady (Prés.), Émile Durkheim. Textes 1. Éléments d’une théorie sociale. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
• Durkheim, E. (1979a). Introduction to ethics. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim: Essays on morals and education (H. L. Sutcliffe, Trans., pp. 77–96). London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Durkheim, E. (1979b). A discussion on the notion of social equality. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim: Essays on morals and education. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Durkheim, E. (1992). The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Houndmills, Basingstoke and London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
• Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York & London: The Free Press.
• Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
• Durkheim, É. (2012). L’éducation morale. Paris: Quadrige / PUF. Durkheim, É. (2015). Leçons de sociologie. Paris: Quadrige / PUF.
• Fish, J. (2005). Defending the Durkheimian tradition. Religion, emotion and morality. Aldershot; Burlington: Ashgate.
• Gofman, A. (2014). Chapter 3. Durkheim’s theory of social solidarity and social rules. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 45–70). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Gofman, A. (2015). Teorii traditsii v sotsiologuicheskoy traditsii [Theories of Tradition in Sociological Tradition]. In A. Gofman, Tradition, solidarity and sociological theory. Selected Texts. Moscow: Noviy Khronogfaf.
• Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action (J. Gaines & P. Keast, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press; Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
• La Question religieuse. Enquête internationale. (1907). Mercure de France, T.67. N237. 1er Mai.
• Lenin. (1976). The tasks of the youth leagues. Speech delivered at the third all-Russia congress of the Russian Young Communist League. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Parsons, T. (1949). The structure of social action. Glencoe: The Free Press.
• Turner, S. (Ed.). (1993). Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and moralist. London: Routledge.
• Wallwork, E. (1972). Durkheim, morality and milieu. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Watts-Miller, W. (1996). Durkheim, morals and modernity. London: UCL Press. Weber, M. (1991). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright-Mills (Eds., Trans.). From Max Weber. Essays in sociology. London: Routledge.