The Relationship Between Schwartz’s Basic Human Values and Psychological Well-Being: Example of Samandağ/Hatay

Abstract

The global rise in prosperity has reshaped individuals’ perceptions of mental health and states of well-being. In parallel with this shift, domains within positive psychology -such as well-being, post-traumatic growth, and self-actualization- have gained increasing prominence, moving beyond the mere prevention of organic health problems. Empirical research demonstrates that individuals’ well-being is closely intertwined with personal perceptions. Given the influence of values on subconscious processes, investigating their association with well-being holds considerable importance. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of existing studies have been conducted with university or workplace samples. Consequently, it was deemed necessary to revisit the relationship between values and well-being within a more natural and locally representative sample. For this purpose, the Schwartz Value Orientation Scale and the Psychological Well-Being Scale were administered to 532 participants selected through convenience sampling in the Samandağ district of Hatay. The collected raw data were analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. The results revealed that the subdimensions of the Schwartz Value Orientation Scale exhibited a low-level positive correlation with psychological well-being. However, no significant association was found between psychological well-being and the religious and spiritual values subdimension, which had been added to the scale. This finding may suggest that individuals navigating the transition from traditionalism to modernity, and subsequently to postmodernity, display a certain degree of cognitive and emotional ambivalence. Regression analysis further demonstrated that the values of benevolence and achievement significantly predicted psychological well-being. In the context of the Samandağ sample, this indicates that benevolence and achievement value orientations positively influence individuals’ psychological well-being. Future research focusing on the interplay between psychological well-being and values could help identify which types of values more strongly predict individuals’ sense of peace and happiness. Furthermore, the religious and ethnic diversity of the sample may imply that social coexistence is grounded not in religious distinctions or individualism, but in shared values such as benevolence and achievement. The absence of a significant relationship involving the religious–spiritual values subdimension may be attributable to its content reflecting predominantly Sunni doctrine. The distinctive characteristics of the sample contribute to the originality of the study. Notably, the emergence of benevolence and achievement as significant predictors of psychological well-being warrants consideration in the formulation of both individual and societal strategies.

Keywords

• Psychology of Religion
• Psychology of Values
• Schwartz’s Basic Human Values
• Psychological Well-Being

Schwartz'ın Temel İnsani Değerleri ile Psikolojik İyi Oluş Arasındaki İlişki: Hatay/Samandağ Örneği

Abstract

Dünya genelindeki refah seviyesinin artışı, bireylerin ‘iyi olma’ halleri ve mental sağlık algılarını yeniden şekillendirmiştir. Bu gelişmeyle birlikte, sadece organik sağlık sorunlarından kaçınmanın ötesinde, ‘iyi oluş’, travma sonrası büyüme, ‘kendini gerçekleştirme’ gibi pozitif psikoloji alanları giderek daha fazla önem kazanmaktadır. Araştırmalar, bireylerin iyi oluş hallerinin, kişisel algılarla derin bir ilişki içinde olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Değerlerin bilinçaltı süreçler üzerindeki etkisi göz önüne alındığında, iyi oluş düzeyiyle olan bağlantılarının incelenmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır. Literatür taramaları, mevcut çalışmaların çoğunun üniversite ve iş yerleri gibi örneklemlerde gerçekleştirildiğini göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, değerler ve iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin daha doğal ve yerel bir örneklemde yeniden ele alınması gerektiği düşünülmüştür. Bu amaçla, Hatay’ın Samandağ ilçesinde kolayda örnekleme tekniğiyle seçilen 532 katılımcıya “Schwartz Değer Yönelimleri Ölçeği” ve “Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği” uygulanmış, elde edilen ham veriler korelasyon ve regresyon analizleriyle çözümlenmiştir. Ulaşılan bulgulara göre Schwartz Değer Yönelimleri Ölçeğinin alt boyutları, psikolojik iyi oluş ile düşük düzeyde pozitif ilişki gösterirmiştir. Bununla birlikte ölçeğe eklenen dini-manevi değerler alt boyut ile psikolojik iyi oluş arasında anlamlı bir ilişkiye rastlanmamıştır. Bu bulgular; geleneksellikten modernliğe oradan da postmodernliğe doğru geçiş süreci yaşayan bireylerin bilişsel ve duygusal anlamda ikircikli bir özelik arz ettiği şeklinde değerlendirilebilir. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre “iyilikseverlik” ve “başarı” alt kategorisinin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyini anlamlı şekilde yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç; Samandağ örnekleminde iyilikseverlik ve başarı değer yöneliminin bireylerin psikolojik iyi oluş hallerini olumu yönde etkilediği şeklinde değerlendirilebilir. Sonraki çalışmalarda psikolojik iyilik hali ile değerler arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanmak, hangi değer türlerinin bireyin huzur ve mutluluk düzeylerini daha fazla yordadığını anlamaya imkân sağlayabilir. Bununla birlikte örneklemin dini ve etnik olarak çoğulcu bir yapıda olması, birlikte yaşamanın dini farklılıklar ve bireyselleşme üzerinden değil “iyilikseverlik” ve başarı” değerleri üzerinden mümkün olabileceği şekinde yorumlanabilir. Ölçekteki din-manevi değerlerin muhteva olarak Sünni doktrini çağrıştırıcı olması sonuçların ilişkisiz çıkmasına neden olmuş olabilir. Örneklemin özgünlüğü, çalışmayı orijinal hale getirmektedir. Özellikle iyilikseverlik ve başarı değerlerinin psikolojik iyi oluşu yordayıcı bir faktör olarak ortaya çıkması, geliştirilecek bireysel ve toplumsal stratejilerde dikkate alınabilir.

Keywords

• Din Psikolojisi
• Değerler Psikolojisi
• Schwartz Temel İnsani Değerler
• Psikolojik İyi Oluş

References

1. Acaray, Ali. “Örgütsel Muhalefetin Kişisel Değerler ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş ile İlişkinin İncelenmesi.” Business and Management Studies: An International Journal.” Business & Management Studies: An International Journal (BMIJ) 6/3 (2018), 171–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i3.348
2. Asar, Çiğdem. Tanrı Tasavvuru ve Değerler. Ankara: Eskiyeni Yayınları, 2021.
3. Asar, Çiğdem- Kayıklık, Hasan - Yapıcı, Asım. “Lise Öğrencilerinin Değer Yönelimlerinin Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi: Yalova Örneği”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 36 (Aralık 2020), 375-405. https://doi.org/10.35209/ksuifd.801887
4. Athota, Vidya S. et al. “Influence of Personality Traits and Moral Values on Employee Well-Being, Resilience and Performance: A Cross-National Study.” Applied Psychology 69/3 (2020), 653–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12198
5. Aydın, Cüneyd. Birey ve Kutsal Destek: İbadetler, Dini Başa Çıkma ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş Üzerine. Ankara: Son Çağ Akademi.
6. Baldwin, Matthew - Keefer, Lucas A. “Being Here and Now: The Benefits of Belonging in Space and Time.” Journal of Happiness Studies 21/8 (2020), 3069–3093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00214-7
7. Barenbaum, Nicole B. “The Case (s) of Gordon Allport.” Journal of Personality 65/3 (1997), 743–755.
8. Bilican, Fatma I.- Yapıcı, Asım - Kutlu, M. Oğuz. “A value model for depressive symptoms and hopelessness among university students in Turkey.” Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri/Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16/4 (2016) 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0112

9. Bilsky, Wolfgang - Schwartz, Shalom H. “Values and Personality.” European Journal of Personality, 8/3 (September 1994) 163-181 https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080303
10. Bochner, Stephen. “Culture Shock Due to Contact with Unfamiliar Cultures.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 8/1 (March 2003). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1073
11. Bojanowska, Agnieszka - Piotrowski, Konrad. “Two Levels of Personality: Temperament and Values and Their Effects on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being.” Current Psychology 40, (2021) 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-018-0043-0 (Published online: 3 November 2018)
12. Bradburn, Norman M. The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Oxford: Aldine, 1969.
13. Brown, Kirk Warren - Kasser, Tim. “Are Psychological and Ecological Well-Being Compatible? The Role of Values, Mindfulness, and Lifestyle.” Social Indicators Research 74/2 (2005), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8
14. Brown, Nicholas J. L. - Rohrer, Julia M. “Easy as (Happiness) Pie? A Critical Evaluation of a Popular Model of the Determinants of Well-Being.” Journal of Happiness Studies 21/4 (2020), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00128-4
15. Burr, Andrew – Santo, Jonathan B. – Pushkar, Dolores. “Affective Well-Being in Retirement: The Influence of Values, Money, and Health Across Three Years.” Journal of Happiness Studies 12/1 (2011), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9173-2
16. Ceri, Veysi – Cicek, İlhan “Psychological Well-Being, Depression and Stress During COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey: A Comparative Study of Healthcare Professionals and Non-Healthcare Professionals.” Psychology, Health & Medicine 26/1 (2020) 85–97. doi:10.1080/13548506.2020.1859566
17. Chen, Wei Chen. “How Cultural Values Affect Subjective Well-Being Among Older Adults: The Role of Proximity of Clothing to Self.” Journal of Happiness Studies 22/1 (2021), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00220-0
18. Christopher, John Chambers. “Situating Psychological Well-Being: Exploring the Culture Roots of Its Theory and Research.” Journal of Counseling & Development 77 (1999), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02434.x
19. Cohen, Aaron - Shamai, Orit. “The Relationship between Individual Values, Psychological Well-Being, and Organizational Commitment among Israeli Police Officers.” Journal of Police Strategies and Management 33/1 (2010), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011020584
20. Cowen, Emory L. “In Pursuit of Wellness.” American Psychologist 46/4 (1991), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.404
21. Deneve, Kristina M. - Cooper, Harris. “The Happy Personality: A Meta-Analysis of 137 Personality Traits and Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Bulletin 124/2 (1998), 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
22. Diener, Ed. “Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Bulletin, 95/3 (1984), 542-575. https://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/Documents/Diener_1984.pdf
23. Diener, Ed - Wirtz, Derrick – Biswas Diener, Robert - Tov, William. “New Measures of Well-Being”. In: Assessing Well-Being The Collected Works of Ed Diener (pp.247-265). Netherlands, Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
24. Diener, Ed - Wirtz, Derrick - Tov, William – Kim Prieto, Chu - Choi, Dong won – Oishi, Shigehiro - Biswas Diener, Robert. “New Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings.” Social Indicators Research 97/2 (May 2010), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
25. Dilmaç, Bülent – Bircan, Hasan Hüseyin. Değerler ve Değerler Psikolojisi. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053648109
26. Emre, Yusuf. Değişen Dünyada Değer Yönelimleri ve Dindarlık: KKTC Örneği. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. 2013.
27. Emre, Yusuf – Yapıcı, Asım. “Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti Vatandaşlarının Değer Yönelimleri.” Turkish Studies (Elektronik) 10/2 (2015), 329 - 350.
28. Geçioğlu, Ahmet Rifat - Emre, Yusuf. “Yerli Kıbrıslı-Türkiye Göçmeni Ayrışmasında Değer Yönelimlerinin Rolü”. Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 10/23 (December 2019), 528-554. https://doi.org/10.35415/sirnakifd.618926.
29. Göçet Tekin, Emine. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik İyi Olma Duygusal Zeka Ve Sosyal İyi Olma Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, 2014. https://acikerisim.sakarya.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12619/69613
30. Göregenli, Melek. “Individualist-Collectivist Tendencies in a Turkish Sample.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28/6 (1997), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197286009
31. Güngör, Erol. Değerler Psikolojisi Üzerinde Araştırmalar, İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınları, 1998.
32. Haslam, Nick- Whelan, Jennifer – Bastian, Brock. “Big Five Traits Mediate Associations between Values and Subjective Well-Being.” Personality and Individual Differences 46/1 (2009), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.001
33. Imamoglu, E. Olcay - Küller, Rikard - Imamoglu, Vacit -Küller, Marianne. “The Social Psychological Worlds of Swedes and Turks in and Around Retirement.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 24/1 (March 27, 1993), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022193241002
34. Inglehart, Ronald - Baker, Wayne E. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65/1 (2000), 19-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288
35. Intelisano, Sabrina – Krasko, Julia – Luhmann, Maike. “Integrating Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Happiness and Well-Being.” Journal of Happiness Studies 21/1 (2020), 161–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00078-x
36. Joshanloo, Mohsen - Ghaedi, Gholamhossein. “Value Priorities as Predictors of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being.” Personality and Individual Differences 47/4 (2009), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.016
37. Karabati, Serdar - Cemalcilar, Zeynep. “Values, Materialism and Well-Being: A Study with Turkish University Students.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31/4 (2010), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.04.007
38. Karabeyeser, Musa. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Anne - Baba Tutumlarına Göre Psikolojik İyi Oluşları. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 2013.
39. Kasser, Tim - Ahuvia, Aaron. “Materialistic Values and Well-Being in Business Students.” European Journal of Social Psychology 32/1 (2002), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.85
40. Kopelman, Richard E. - Rovenpor, Janet L. “Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.” In: Jeffrey H. Greenhaus - Gerard A. Callanan (Eds.) Encylclopedia of Career and Career Development (pp.15-18). Sage Reference Publications, 2006.
41. Kumcagiz, Hatice - Gündüz, Yüksel. “Relationship between Psychological Well-Being and Smartphone Addiction of University Students.” International Journal of Higher Education, 5/4 (2016), 144-156. doi:10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1640
42. Kuyumcu, Behire- Güven, Mehmet. “Türk ve İngiliz Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Duygularını Fark Etmeleri ve İfade Etmeleri ile Psikolojik İyi Oluşları Arasındaki İlişki.” Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14/2 (2012), 589-607.
43. Leung, Tiffany - Rawana, Edward - Klein, Rupert G. “Exploratory Analysis of Strength Domains and Association with Subjective and Psychological Well-Being among Canadian Adolescents.” Current Psychology. 42, (2023), 990-1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01407-1
44. Libet, Benjamin - Gleason, Curtis A. - Wright Elwood W. - Pear, Dennis K. “Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation To Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of A Freely Voluntary Act”, Brain 106/3 (September 1983), 623–642.
45. Lyubomirsky, Sonja - Sheldon, Kennon M.- Schkade, David. “Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change.” Review of General Psychology, 9/2 (2005), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
46. Markus, Hazel Rose - Kitayama, Shinobu. “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological Review, 98/2 (1991), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
47. Moyano Diaz, Emilio - Moyano Diaz, Emilio - Mendoza-Llanos, Rodolfo. “Psychological Well-Being and Their Relationship with Different Referents and Sources of Happiness in Chile.” Revista de Psicologia (Peru) 39/1 (2021), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.18800/PSICO.202101.007
48. Oishi, Shigehiro – Diener, Ed – Lucas, Richard E. – Suh, Eunkook M. “Cross-Cultural Variations in Predictors of Life Satisfaction: Perspectives from Needs and Values.” University of Illinois , Urbana - Champaign 25/8 (June 2009), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_
49. Özçelik Kaynak, Kezban - Öztuna, Barış. “Bir Üniversite Hastanesinde Sözleşmeli̇ Çalışanların Psikolojik İyi̇ Oluş ve İşyerinde Dışlanma Durumları Arasındaki İlişki̇.” 3. Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi̇ 55/4 (Ocak 2020), 2499–2514. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.20.11.1411
50. Özdemir, Yalçın - Koruklu, Nermin. “Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Değerler ve Mutluluk Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi.” Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 8/1, (Aralık 2011), 190–210.
51. Özensel, Ertan. “Sosyolojik Bir Olgu Olarak Değer.” Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi 1/3 (2003), 217–239. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/302607
52. Proctor, Carmel – Tweed, Roger – Morris, Daniel. “The Rogerian Fully Functioning Person: A Positive Psychology Perspective.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 56/5 (September 2016), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815605936
53. Rathi, Neerpal - Lee, Kidong. “Does It Pay to Be Authentic? Implications of Authenticity for Life Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being in a Collectivist Culture.” Journal of Happiness Studies 22/1 (January. 2021), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00223-x
54. Ratzlaff, Charlotte - Matsumoto, David - Kouznetsova Natalia - Raroque, Jacques - Ray, Rebecca. “Individual Psychological Culture and Subjective Well-Being.” In: Ed Diener - Eunkook. M. Suh (Eds.),Culture and Subjective Well-being (pp. 27-59), The MIT Press. 2020.
55. Rokeach, Milton. “Long-Range Experimental Modification of Values, Attitudes and Behavior.” University of Western Ontario. 1971. http://alanaconner.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Rokeach-1971.pdf
56. Ros, Maria - Schwartz, Shalom, H. – Surkiss, Shoshana, “Basic Individual Values, Work Values and the Meaning of Work.” Applied Psychology 48/187 (1999), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999499377664
57. Ryan, Richard M - Deci, Edward L. “On Happiness And Human Potentials: A Review Ofresearch on Hedonic And Eudaimonic Well-Being.” Annual Review of Psychology 52/1 (2001), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
58. Ryan, Richard M - Deci, Edward L. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” The American Psychologist 55/1 (2000), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
59. Ryff, C D - Keyes, C L M. “The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisted.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (November 1995), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
60. Ryff, C D - Singer, B. “Psychological Well-Being: Meaning, Measurement, and Implications for Psychotherapy Research.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 65/1 (1996), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000289026
61. Ryff, Carol D. “Happiness is everything, or is it - explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57/6), (1989). 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069
62. Ryff, Carol D. “Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life.” Aps Assocıatıon for Psychological Science 4/4 (1995), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
63. Ryff, Carol D. - Singer, Burton H. “Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Happiness Studies 9/1 (2008), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
64. Sagiv, Lilach - Schwartz, Shalom H. “Value Priorities and Subjective Well-Being: Direct Relations and Congruity Effects.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30/2 (March 2000), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200003/04)30:2<177::AID-EJSP982>3.0.CO;2-Z
65. Sagone, Elisabetta - Elvira De Caroli, Maria. “A Correlational Study on Dispositional Resilience, Psychological Well-Being, and Coping Strategies in University Students.” American Journal of Educational Research 2/7 (2014), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-7-5
66. Schwartz, Shalom H. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2/1 (December, 2012). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
67. Schwartz, Shalom H. “Basic Human Values: An Overview.” The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 48 (2006), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999499377664
68. Schwartz, Shalom H. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25/C (1992), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
69. Schwartz, Shalom H. - Bilsky, Wolfgang. “Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53/3 (1987), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
70. Seligman, M. E. - Csikszentmihalyi, M. “Positive Psychology. An Introduction.” The American Psychologist 55/1 (2000), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
71. Seligman, Martin E. P. “Positive Psychology, Positive Prevention, and Positive Therapy.” Handbook of Positive Psychology, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
72. Seligman, Martin E. P. - Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. “‘Positive Psychology: An Introduction’: Reply.” American Psychologist 56/1 (January 2001), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.89
73. Sheldon, Kennon M. “Positive Value Change during College: Normative Trends and Individual Differences.” Journal of Research in Personality 39/2 (2005), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.02.002
74. Sheldon, Kennon M. - Elliot, Andrew J. “Goal Striving, Need Satisfaction, and Longitudinal Well-Being: The Self-Concordance Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76/3 (1999), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
75. Sheldon, Kennon M. - Krieger, Lawrence S. “Walking the Talk: Value Importance, Value Enactment, and Well-Being.” Motivation and Emotion 38/5 (2014), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9424-3
76. Soon, Chun Siong - Brass, Marcel – Heinze, Hans Jochen – Haynes, John Dylan “Unconscious Determinants of Free Decisions in the Human Brain.” Nature Neuroscience 11/5 (May, 2008), 543–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2112
77. Szu Hui Lee, M. A. Salıency Of One’s Heritage Culture: Asian Cultural Values and Its Interconnections With Collective Self-Esteem and Acculturation/Enculturation As Predictor Of Psychological Well-Being of People of Chınese Descent. Ohio State University, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1144642086
78. Taylor, Shelley E. - Brown, Jonathon D. “Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health.” Psychological Bulletin March 103/2 (1988), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
79. Telef, Bülent Baki - Uzman, Ersin – Ergün, Enes. “Öğretmen Adaylarında Psikolojik İyi Oluş ve Değerler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi.” Journal of Turkish Studies 8/12 (2013), 1297–1297. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.5699
80. Telef, Bülent Baki. “Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28/3 (2013), 374–384.
81. Ulu, Mustafa. “İlahiyat Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik İyi Oluşları ve Değer Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişki”. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 20/37 (Haziran 2018).
82. Waterman, Alan S. “Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64/4 (1993), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
83. Welzel, Christian - Inglehart, Ronald. “Agency, Values, and Well-Being: A Human Development Model.” Social Indicators Research, 97/1 (February 2010), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9557-z
84. Yapıcı, Asım – Kutlu, M. Oğuz - Korkmaz, Şadiye. “The Secondary School Students Perspectives on Values: Adana Sample from Turkey.” Journal of Education & Social Policy 3/2 (2016), 123-127.
85. Yapıcı, Asım. “Modernleşme-Sekülerleşme Sürecinde Türk Gençliğinin Anlam Dünyasında Dinin Yeri: Çukurova Üniversitesi Örneği.” Çukurova Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (Haziran 2009), 1-37.
86. Yapıcı, Asım - Kutlu, M. Oğuz - Bilican, F. Işıl. “Öğretmen Adaylarının Değer Yöneli̇mleri̇.” Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 42 (2012), 129–151.
87. Yapıcı, Asım. “Değerler ve Dindarlık Algısında Değişim ve Süreklilik: Değerlerin Bireyselleşmesinden Bireysel Değerlere.” Öğretmenliğin Mesleki Değerleri ve Etik. Mustafa Ergün et al. (eds.) 57-90. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 2018.
88. Yapıcı, Asım - Kutlu, M. Oğuz - Bilican, B. Işıl. “Öğretmen Adaylarında Değer Yönelimleri ile İçki ve Sigara Kullanımı.” Değerler ve Eğitimi-II. Rcep Kaymakcan vd. 950-965. İstanbul: Değerler Eğitimi Merkezi. 2015.
89. Yıldırım, Murat. “Mediating Role of Resilience in The Relationships Between Fear of Happiness and Affect Balance, Satisfaction with Life, and Flourishing.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology 15/2 (2019), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1640