Investigation of yield and quality parameters of some sugar beet varieties in Muş ecological conditions

Year 2023, , 436 - 447, 29.06.2023

Hanifi Yağmur , Mustafa Yaşar

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2023.2.22

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In plant production, determining the suitable varieties suitable for the location and choosing the varieties with the best performance are among the top priorities. Biplot analysis has become widespread in recent years as an important statistical technique for plant breeders and those working in agricultural research. This study was carried out according to Randomized Complete Block Design with 18 upcountry and 2 abroad registered varieties in Muş location in 2022 year. Yield and quality components were investigated. According to the results of variance analysis, it was determined that there were statistically significant differences at the level of 1% among the varieties in terms of all the traits examined. According to the average data obtained in the study; bifurcation varied between (%) 5.4-17.8, leaf yield 13.54-24.28 t ha-1, root yield 73.42-93.57 t ha-1, biological yield 90.29-118.26 t ha-1, sugar content (%) 16.2-19.0, plant juice purity 82.39- 88.10%, dry matter (%) 16.4-20.1, α-amino N (mg 100g-1) 0.0405-0.0498 and ash (%) varied between 2.49-3.35. According to the results of the research, in terms of root yield, G10 no and G14 no varieties came to the fore in terms of the most stable and examined traits. G12 no variety came to the fore in terms of sugar yield and G19 no variety in terms of sugar content. When the average data of all examined traits are evaluated together, G10, G11 and G14 no varieties are considered as the most stable varieties. However, varieties with high root yield, sugar content and sugar yield are the primary preferences of growers in sugar beet production. When all the data of the varieties used in the research are evaluated together; G2, G4, G8, G10, G11, G12, G14, G15 and G19 no varieties can be recommended for Muş ecological conditions. However, it was concluded that the study should be carried out in the following years for more decisive recommendations.

Keywords

Sugarbeet, variety, root yield, sugar content, biplot

Supporting Institution

This study was produced from the master's thesis of Muş Alparslan University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Plant Production and Technologies.

Thanks

Thanks to Agricultural Engineer Yusuf YAVUZ ve Emin BEKİROĞLU from Yıldız Tarım İşletmeleri A.Ş. for their support in this study.

References

• Ada, R., Akınerdem, F. (2011). Determination of The Yield, Quality and Losses of Mechanized Harvesting of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.) Harvested Different Dates Selçuk Üniversitesi Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 25 (1): (2011) 17-25 ISSN:1309-0550
• Akyar, O.C., Cagatay, M., Kayimoglu, E., Özbek, A., Titiz., S. (1980). Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem bereinigten Zuckergehalt und der chemischen Zusammensetzung der Zuckerrübe. Zuckerindustrie. 105: 457-466.
• Alfaig E.A.A., Hassen, K.S., Mohammed, A.E. (2011). Evaluation of Sugar Beet Parameters During Storage. Journal of Science and Technology of Sudan University of Science and Technology, 12 (02): 1-6.
• Armstrong, M.J., Milford, G.F.J. (1985). The nitrogen nutrition of sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review. 53(4), 42–44.
• Azam Jah, K., Shad, A., Younas, M., Mohammad, I., Khan, D. (2003). Selection and Evulation of Exotic Genotypes of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Peshawar Valley. Asian Journal of Plant Science 2(8):655-660.
• Boyacıoğlu, A., Kaya, R., Gürel, S. (2014), Türkiye’de Şeker Pancarında Çeşit Seçim Stratejileri ve Şeker Pancarının Verim ve Kalitesinin Gelişimi, Uluslararası Mezopotamya Tarım Kongresi, Diyarbakır, Bildiri Özeti Kitabı, Sayfa 133 (in Turkish).
• Burba, M. (1996). Invert Sugar and Harmfull Nitrogen As Quality Parameters of Sugar Beet. In Comptes-Rendus des Congres de l'Institut International de Recherches Betteravieres (Belgium).
• Can, R. (2016). Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown in Different Area Conditions of Yozgat and Determine Different Time of Harvest, The Effect of Yield and Quality, Bozok Üniv. FBE. Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı, Sayfa 77.
• Canıgeniş, T. (2012). The Effects of Different Nitrogen Doses on Tuber Yield and Quality of N and Nz Type Sugar Beet Varieties (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludağ University.
• Curcic, Z., Ciric, M., Nagl, N., Taski-Ajdukovic, K. (2018). Effect of sugar beet genotype, planting and harvesting dates and their interaction on sugar yield. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01041
• Çakmakçı, R., Oral, E. (1998). Effect of Different Field Emergence Rates on the Yield and Qualiyty of Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown with and without Thinning. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 22: 451–461.
• Çakmakçı, R., Tıngır, N. (2001). The Effect of Grovving Perjod on Grovvth, Yield and Quauty of Sugar Beet. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 32: 41-49.
• Çatal, M.İ., Akınerdem, F. (2013). Determination of Yield and Quality Properties of Some Sugar Beet Varieties in Conditions of Konya. Selcuk Journal of Agr. and Food Sciences, 27(2), 112-120.
• Çelikel, B., (1989). Şeker Pancarı Çeşitlerinde Verim ve Verim Unsurları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Trakya Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Tarla Bitkileri Böl. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 42 s. (in Turkish).
• Çimrin, K.M. (2001). The Effect of Fertilization on N, P, K Content and Uptake of Sugar Beet. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi (J. Agric. Sci.), 2001, 11(1):5-10.
• Doxtator, C.W., Bauserman, H.M. (1952). Chemical Constituents of Five Varieties Grown in Six Midwestern Factory Areas. American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. http://assbt-proceedings.org/ (2012).
• FAOSTAT. (2022). Countries Producing Sugar Beet in 2020/2021 Production Year in the World. Access link: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize
• Gauch HG, (2006). Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46(4), 1488–1500.
• Ghaffari, H., Tadayon, M.R., Nadeem, M., Cheema, M., Razmjoo, J. (2019). Proline-mediated changes in antioxidant enzymatic activities and the physiology of sugar beet under drought stress. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 41(2), 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2815-z
• Gholizadeh, A., Ghaffari, M., Jabbari, H., Cheshmehnoor, M., Nadali, F., Payghamzadeh, K., Kia, S. (2022). Evaluation of Genotype× environment interaction for seed yield of sunflower hybrids using GGE biplot method. Journal of Crop Breeding, 14(41), 194-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.14.41.194
• Hergert, G.W. (2010). Sugar beet fertilization. Sugar Tech, 12(3), 256-266.
• Hoffmann, C.M., Huijbregts, T., Swaaij, N., Jansen, R. (2009). Impact of Different Environments in Europe on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet Genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy, 30:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.004
• Jockovic M, Cvejic S, Jocic S, Marjanovic-Jeromela A, Miladinovic D, Jockovic B, Radic V. (2019). Evaluation of Sunflower Hybrids in Multi-Environment Trial (MET). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 24(2), 202-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.645276
• Khan, M.M.H., Rafii, M.Y., Ramlee, S.I. et al. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trials (METs). Sci Rep 11, 22791 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01411-2
• Keskin, M.E. (2018). Şeker pancarında farklı azot ve kükürt dozlarının verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri (Master's thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü) (in Turkish).
• Kurtcebe, Ş. (1999). Göller Yöresine Uygun Monogerm Şeker Pancarı Çeşitlerinin Belirlenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sayfa 36. (in Turkish).
• Mahn, K., Hoffmann, C., Märländer, B. (2002). Distribution of quality components in different morphological sections of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy,17: 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00139-3
• Movahedi H, Mostafavi K, Shams M, Golparvar A.R. (2020). AMMI Analysis of Genotype× Environment İnteraction on Grain Yield of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes in Iran. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 34:1, 1013-1018, DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2020.1816216.
• Ober, E.S., Rajabi, A. (2010). Abiotic stress in sugar beet. Sugar Tech, 12(3), 294-298.
• Okut, N., Yıldırım, B. (2004). The Effects of Planting Time and Species on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L.) in Van Condition. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(2), 149-158.
• Pidgeon, J.D., Werker, A.R., Jaggard, K.W, Richter, G.M., Lister, D.H., Jones, P.D. (2001). Climatic Impact on the Productivity of Sugar Beet in Europe, 1961–1995. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 109: 27–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00254-4
• Rashidi, M., Abbassi, S. (2011). Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Root Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.). Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal Internation 2 (2): 51-56.
• Sefaoğlu, F., Kaya, C., Karakuş, A. (2016). The Determination of Yield and Yield Components of Sugarbeet Genotypes (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.) Harvested at Different Dates Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25 (ÖZEL SAYI-2), 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.281846
• Stevanato, P., Chiodi, C., Broccanello, C., Concheri, G., Biancardi, E., Pavli, O., Skaracis, G. (2019). Sustainability of the sugar beet crop. Sugar Tech, 21(5), 703-716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00734-9
• Stevanato, P., Zavalloni, C., Marchetti, R., Bertaggia, M., Saccomani, M., McGrath, J.M., Panella, L.W., Biancardi, E. (2010). Relationship between Subsoil Nitrogen Availability and Sugarbeet Processing Quality. American Society of Agronomy, Agron. J. 102: 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0041
• Şahin, M. (2002). Toprak Kompaktlaşmasının Şeker Pancarı Verim ve Kalitesine Etkileri. Türkiye Şeker Fabrikaları A.Ş., İkinci Ulusal Şeker Pancarı Üretimi Sempozyumu, Şeker Pancarı Üretiminde Verim ve Kalitenin Yükseltilmesi, (1), 378 – 392, Ankara. (in Turkish) Şatana, A. (1996). Bazı Şeker Pancarı Çeşitlerinin Gelişme Dönemleri Üzerine Araştırmalar. Trakya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tekirdağ. (in Turkish).
• Şatana, A. (2011). Farklı Zamanlarda Uygulanan Bor ve Çinko Dozlarının Şeker Pancarında (Beta vulgaris L. var. Saccharifera Alefeld) Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerine Etkisinin Araştırılması. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi Basılmamıştır. Tekirdağ. (in Turkish)
• Şatana, A., Atakişi, İ. (1999). Bazı Şekerpancarı Çeşitlerinin Gelişme Dönemleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. 3. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 15-18 Kasım 1999, Sayfa 155-158, Adana. (in Turkish)
• Topak, R., Süheri, S. & Acar, B. Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water use efficiency in Middle Anatolian, Turkey. Irrig Sci 29, 79–89 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0219-3
• Tosun, B., Karadoğan, T., Şanlı, A. (2019). Değişik Zamanlarda Hasat Edilen Farklı Tipteki Şeker Pancarı (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23, 1-8. (in Turkish)
• Turgut, T. (2012). Çeşit ve Lokasyon Farklılıklarının Şeker Pancarı (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.)’nın Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 117 Sayfa. (in Turkish)
• Usmani, Z., Sharma, M., Diwan, D., Tripathi, M., Whale, E., Jayakody, L. N., Gupta, V. K. (2022). Valorization of sugar beet pulp to value-added products: A review. Bioresource Technology, 346, 126580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126580
• Xu N.Y, Fok M, Zhang G.W, Li J, Zhou Z.G, 2014. The Application of GGE Biplot Analysis for Evaluating Test Locations and Mega-Environment İnvestigation of Cotton Regional Trials. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(9), 1921-1933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60656-5
• Yarnia, M., Benam, M.B.K., Arbat, H.K., Tabrizi, E.F.M., Hassanpanah, D. (2008). Effects of Complete Micronutrients and Their Application Method on Root Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet cv. Rassoul. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Volume: 6, 3-4: 341-345.
• Yaşar, M. (2022). Muş’ta Şekerpancarı (Beta Vulgaris L.) Üretiminin Mevcut Durumu ve Üretimi Artırmanın Yolları Stratejik Sektör: TARIM Kitabı. Bölüm 2. Sayfa: 41-86. ISBN: 978-625-8405-49-1 Erişim Linki: https://iksadyayinevi.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Stratejik-Sektor-TARIM.pdf İksad Yayınevi. Ankara/Türkiye 2022. (in Turkish).
• Yaşar, M. (2023). Yield and fiber quality traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars analyzed by biplot method. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 35(4), 102632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2023.102632
• Yaşar, M., Kendal, E. (2022). Muş Şartlarına En Uygun Şeker Pancarı Çeşitlerinin Belirlenmesi. Munzur 4th International Conference on Applied Sciences. ISBN: 978-605-71828-4-5 August 13- 14, 2022.Tunceli, Türkiye. (in Turkissh)
• Yaşar, M., Katar, D., Katar, N., (2023). Investigation of Yield and Quality Traits of Some Sugar Beet Genotypes. 9th International Zeugma Conference on Scientific Research. ISBN:978-625-6404-76-2. February 19-21, 2023/ Gaziantep, Türkiye.
• Yasar, M., Ekinci, R. (2021). Stability analysis of sugar beet genotypes in terms of yield and sugar ratios (Beta vulgaris Var. saccharifera L.). World Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, 6(1), 11-16. (DOI): https://doi.org/10.33865/wjb.006.01.0386
• Yan, W., & Tinker, N. A. (2006). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian journal of plant science, 86(3), 623-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-16