Investigation of Durum Wheat Genotypes (Triticum durum Desf.) in Terms of Quality and Some Agronomic Traits

Year 2023, , 725 - 734, 29.12.2023

Mehmet Karaman , Mehmet Yıldırım , Cuma Akıncı

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2023.4.1

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Türkiye is one of the origin centers of durum wheat and among the important producer countries of durum wheat. The aim of this study is to examine some durum wheat genotypes with different characteristics in terms of some agronomic and quality characteristics and to determine the relationships between features. The study was carried out in four different environments with supplementary irrigated and based of rainfed in Diyarbakir province conditions. Trial design carry out according to Randomized Complete Blocks Split Plots Experiment Design and three replications. It was determined that there were significant differences at the p<0.01 level between genotypes in all the traits examined. According to the research results, change range of average values in durum wheat varieties were determined as; heading time (HT) 170.33-178.42 days, plant height (PH) 93.0-139.2 cm, the number of spikes per square meter (SN) 441.50-567.50 spikes/m2, the number of grains per spike (GN) 40.7-65.5 grains/spike, thousand grain weight (TGW) 32.4-47.0 g, test weight (TW) 77.5-85.6 kg/hl, protein ratio (PR) 12.72-17.21%, sedimentation amount (SA) 9.58-25.08 ml, b yellowness value (YV) 18.27-27.90, vitreousness ratio (VR) 75.42%-85.42%. Plant height exhibited a positive correlation with protein content (r = 0.728**), and sedimentation amount also demonstrated a positive correlation with the b yellowness value (r = 0.649**). As a general trend, genotypes with spring attributes were positioned ahead of those with winter characteristics. It has been observed that winter genotypes have a heading time 5-6 days later than that of spring genotypes. Since Fırat-93 (TGW), Kunduru 1149 (PR), Urfa 2005 (TW and VR) and Candidate 1 (SA and YV) genotypes are at the forefront in terms of quality parameters. It would be beneficial to use these genotypes as parents and to protect them as genitor.

Keywords

Durum wheat, agronomy, quality, Triticum durum Desf.

Project Number

TAGEM/TABAD/16/A12/P02/003 ve Ziraat.15.002

References

• Ali, M.J. (2017). Investigation of yield, yield components and primary quality characteristics of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Master Thesis, Bingöl University, Bingöl. p, 1-95.
• Altay, Z., Eren Ünsal, N., Ünsal, A.S. (2021). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some durum wheat varieties in Mardin/Nusaybin district. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(1), 24-35. https://masjaps.com/index.php/mas/article/view/5/3
• Atlı, A., Aktan, B., Şanal, T., Evlice, A.K., Ünsal, S., Dönmez, E., Köten, M., Pehlivan, A., Özderen, T. (2010). Makarnalık buğdayın kalite özellikleri ve kalite değerlendirme. Makarnalık Buğday ve Mamülleri Konferansı, 7-18 Mayıs 2010, Şanlıurfa, s:91-109 (in Turkish).
• Aykut, F., Yüce, S., Demir, İ., Akçalı Can, R. R., Furan, M. A. (2005). Ekmeklik Buğday Çeşit ve Hatlarının Bornova Koşullarında Performansları. Türkiye VI. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 5-9 Eylül, Antalya, s:89-93 (in Turkish).
• Bayhan, M. (2022). Evaluation of quality characteristics of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes by GGE biplot analysis method. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 573-582. https://ispecjournal.com/index.php/ispecjas/article/view/348/352
• Branković, G., Dodig, D., Pajić, V., Kandić, V., Knežević, D., Djurić, N., Živanović, T. (2018). Genetic parameters of Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum for technological quality properties in Serbia. Zemdirbyste, 105(1), 39-48. http://www.zemdirbyste-agriculture.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/105_1_str6.pdf
• Doğan, Y., Cetiz, M.B. (2015). Determination of yield and quality traits in registered durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) cultivars of Turkey in Mardin-Kızıltepe conditions. YYU Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(3), 304-311. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyutbd/issue/22012/236417
• Doruk Kahraman, N., Gökmen, S. (2022). Determination of some phonological, morphological characteristics and yield, yield components of durum wheats in Konya conditions. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 11(1), 40-48. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2282721 Elgün, A., Ertugay, Z., Certel, M., Kotancılar, H.G. (2002). Tahıl ve ürünlerinde analitik kalite kontrolü ve laboratuvar uygulama kılavuzu (Düzeltilmiş 3. Baskı). Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, No: 867, Ziraat Fak. Yay. No, 335, Ders Kitapları Serisi No: 82, p.245. Erzurum-Türkiye (in Turkish).
• El-Khayat, G.H., Samaan, J., Manthy, F.A., Fuller, M.P., Brennan, C.S. (2006). Durum wheat quality I: some physical and chemical characteristics of Syrian durum wheat genotypes. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 41(Supplement 2): 22-29. https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01245.x
• Enes, A., Eren Ünsal, N., Ünsal, A.S. (2021). Determination of important parameters affecting the yield and quality of durum wheat varieties in dry conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 246-256. https://ispecjournal.com/index.php/ispecjas/article/view/165/205
• Ertekin, M.C. (2011). The determination of yield and yield components of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) with different sowing densities in bed sowing methods. Dicle University Institute of Science, Department of Field Crops Master’s Thesis, Diyarbakır. p, 1-40.
• FAO, (2019). Food And Agricultural Commodities Production. World wheat production and harvesting area in 2018, https://www.fao.org/food-agriculture-statistics/en/
• Güngör, A., Akgöl, B. (2015). Evaluation of yield and quality traits of durum wheat genotypes by biplot analysis method under Kirklareli ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agrıcultural and Natural Sciences, 2(3), 256-267. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/issue-file/3076
• Heun, M., Schafer-Pregl, R., Klawan, D., Castagna, R., Accerbi, M., Borghi, B., Salamini, F. (1997). Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science, 278, 1312-1314. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.278.5341.1312
• ICC. (2008). International Association For Cereal Science And Technology (ICC), Vienna, Standarts No: 116/1.
• Kalaycı, M. (2005). Örneklerle JUMP kullanımı ve tarımsal araştırma için varyans analiz modelleri. Anadolu Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, yayın no: 21, Eskisehir (in Turkish).
• Karababa, E., Ercan, R. (1995). Bread baking potential and quality of durum wheat. Gıda, 20(3), 153-159.
• Karaman, M. (2017). Determination of physiological and morphological parameters associated with grain yield and quality traits in durum wheat. Dicle University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, PhD Thesis, Diyarbakır. p, 1-149.
• Manthey, F. (2001). Durum Wheat Color. www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/plantsci/breeding/durum
• Naneli, İ., Sakin, M.A., Kıral, A.S. (2015). Determination of yield and quality of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties at Tokat-Kazova Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 32(1), 91-103. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/177249/
• Özen, S., Akman, Z. (2015). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some bread wheat cultivars in Yozgat ecologial conditions. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture, 10(1), 35-43. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/308634
• Pehlivan, A., İkincikarakaya, S. (2017). Quality breeding studies in durum wheat. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 26(1), 127-151. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/322307
• Porceddu, E. Pacucci, G. Perrino, P. Gatta, C.D. Maellaro, I. (1973). Protein content and seed characteristics in populations of triticum durum grown at three different locations. Proc. of the Symp. on Genetics and Breeding Durum Wheat, Univ, di Bari, p, 217-222, 14-18 Maggio.
• Sakin, M.A., Yıldırım, A., Gökmen, S. (2004). Determining the yield, yield components and quality properties of some durum wheat genotypes in Tokat-Kazova conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4), 481-489. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1876850
• Stenvert, N.L., Kingswood, K. (1977). The influence of the physical structure of the protein matrix on wheat hardness. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 28, 11-19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsfa.2740280103
• Şahinter, S. (2015). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) cultıvars and lines under Tokat-Zile conditions. Gazi Osmanpaşa University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Field Crops Master’s Thesis, Tokat.
• Tanrıkulu, Ö.F. (2018). An assessment on yield, quality and profitablity of some bread and durum wheat varieties, grown in Diyarbakır. Harran University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Field Crops Master’s Thesis, Şanlıurfa. p, 1-139.
• Turnbull, K.M., Rahman, S. (2002). Endosperm texture in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 36(3), 327-337. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733521002904686
• Williams, P., Haremein, F.J., Nakkoul, H., Rihawi, S. (1988). Crop quality evaluation methods and guidelines. ICARDA Aleppo, Syria.
• Yıldırım, A., Atasoy, A.F. (2020). Quality characteristics of some durum wheat varieties grown in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey (GAP). Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Sci.., 24(4), 420-431. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1107127
• Yıldırım, A., Sakin, M. A., Gökmen, S. (2005). Evaluation of some common bread wheat cultivars advanced and breeding lines for yield and yield components. GOU. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 22(1), 63-72.
• Yürür, N., Turan, Z.M., Çakmakçı, S. (1987). Bazı ekmeklik ve makarnalık buğday çeşitlerinin bursa koşullarında verim ve adaptasyon yeteneği üzerine araştırmalar. Türkiye Tahıl Sempozyumu, 6-9 Ekim 1987, 59-69. Bursa (in Turkish).