Ondokuz Mayıs University drinking water treatment plant carbon footprint: emission sources and strategies for sustainability
Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to calculate the carbon footprint of the drinking water treatment facility within Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs University and to determine the greenhouse gas emission sources within the facility. The total daily CO2 emission of the drinking water treatment plant is calculated as 85.05 kg CO2e/d. The analyses show that off-site CO2 emissions are higher than on-site CO2 emission values. It has been determined that the primary source of off-site emissions arises from the electrical energy consumption used in the units, constituting approximately 86.4% of the total CO2 emissions. The second important contribution parameter arises from the reaction of coagulants in mechanical mixing processes. This study emphasizes the importance of taking measures that support greener and sustainable production to reduce the current greenhouse gas emissions of the facility. In addition, calculating the carbon emissions of the drinking water treatment plant is important in informing the relevant institutions in the European Union’s efforts to achieve the goal of zeroing carbon emissions by 2050.
Keywords
Carbon footprint, Greenhouse gases, Drinking water treatment plant, Sustainable water management, Climate change
Supporting Institution
This research has been funded by Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey (Project No. PYO.MUH.1908.22.036)
Project Number
PYO.MUH.1908.1908.22.036
Ethical Statement
Ethics committee approval is not required.
Thanks
The author would like to thank the authorities of the rectorate of OMU for their support in data collection.
References
- Bani Shahabadi, M., Yerushalmi, L., & Haghighat, F. (2009). Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 43(10), 2679–2687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.040
- Bani Shahabadi, M., Yerushalmi, L., & Haghighat, F. (2010). Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application. Chemosphere, 78(9), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.044
- Beeftink, M., Hofs, B., Kramer, O., Odegard, I., & van der Wal, A. (2021). Carbon footprint of drinking water softening as determined by life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123925
- Bonton, A., Bouchard, C., Barbeau, B., & Jedrzejak, S. (2012). Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants. Desalination, 284, 42–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.035
- Clabeaux, R., Carbajales-Dale, M., Ladner, D., & Walker, T. (2020). Assessing the carbon footprint of a university campus using a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122600
- Coşkun, S., & Doğan, N. (2021). Tekstil Endüstrisinde Karbon Ayak İzinin Belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.670336
- Ecoinvent. (2019). Ecoinvent v3. Retrieved in January,1, 2024 from https://ecoinvent.org/
- Güller, S., & Balcı, A. (2018). Carbon Footprint Assessment of Mugla Waste Water Treatment Plant. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22, 547–555.
- Hofs, B., van den Broek, W., van Eckeveld, A., & van der Wal, A. (2022). Carbon footprint of drinking water over treatment plant life span (2025–2075) is probably dominated by construction phase. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 5(October 2021), 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100079
- INCOPA. (2014). Life Cycle Analysis of Leading Coagulants : Executive Summary Format of this document. Retrieved in January,1, 2024 from https://www.incopa.org/news/life-cycle-assessment-lca-report/
