An AI-Driven Cradle-to-Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Energy and Carbon Sustainability in Crop–Soil–Climate Systems

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1352 - 1360, 26.12.2025

Kutalmış Turhal , Ümit Çiğdem Turhal

https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.4.35

https://izlik.org/JA65BL42XZ

Abstract

This research introduces a framework for assessing sustainability in agricultural production, enhanced by AI, that merges environmental, agronomic, and management aspects into a cohesive decision-support system. Drawing on data from Karnataka, India, the study examined six critical parameters including crop type, soil pH, rainfall, temperature, soil classification, and nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (NPK) fertilizer inputs. A Composite Sustainability Indicators (CSI) was created to assess the multifaceted performance of various crops through five normalized sub-index computation: fertilizer efficiency, pH suitability, rainfall adequacy, temperature compatibility, and soil quality. Specific optimal thresholds were established for key crops like wheat, barley, and maize to align with their unique ecological needs. An efficient Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) component calculated energy equivalents (N = 60.6 MJ kg⁻¹, P₂O₅ = 11.1 MJ kg⁻¹, K₂O = 6.7 MJ kg⁻¹) and greenhouse gas emissions (N = 6.6, P₂O₅ = 1.0, K₂O = 0.6 kg CO₂e kg⁻¹) associated with fertilizer usage. An AI-driven regression model (R² = 0.93; MAE = 0.024) was employed to predict CSI under diverse environmental conditions, to facilitate scenario analyses for variations in soil pH (+0.5), rainfall (±100 mm), temperature (±2 °C), and fertilizer rates (±20%). The findings indicated that moderate reductions in fertilizer use improved sustainability scores, whereas climatic variability elicited varied responses based on the crop. Overall, this AI-LCA-enhanced framework offered a data-driven and flexible solution for precision agriculture, melding resource efficiency with environmental responsibility. It fosters sustainable production planning, adaptive management amidst climate variability, and informed policymaking aimed at building resilient agricultural systems.

Keywords

Precision agriculture , Artificial intelligence , Sustainability assessment , Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) , Composite Sustainability Index (CSI) , What-if simulation , Multi-criteria decision analys

References

• Prediction. Scientific Research Timelines Journal, 3(1), 15-18.
• Alaoui, A., Barão, L., Ferreira, C. S., & Hessel, R. (2022). An overview of sustainability assessment frameworks in agriculture. Land, 11(4), 537.
• Anastasiou, E., Fountas, S., Voulgaraki, M., Psiroukis, V., Koutsiaras, M., Kriezi, O., ... & Gómez-Barbero, M. (2023). Precision farming technologies for crop protection: A meta-analysis. Smart Agricultural Technology, 5, 100323.
• Azizpanah, A., Taki, M. 2025. Evaluating the sustainability of sugar beet production using life cycle assessment approach. Sugar Tech. 27:78-93.
• Bahmutsky, S., Grassauer, F., Arulnathan, V., & Pelletier, N. (2024). A review of life cycle impacts and costs of precision agriculture for cultivation of field crops. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 52, 347-362.
• Barrow, N. J., & Hartemink, A. E. (2023). The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants. Plant and Soil, 487(1), 21-37.
• Benlamlih, F. Z., Lamhamedi, M. S., Pepin, S., Benomar, L., & Messaddeq, Y. (2021). Evaluation of a new generation of coated fertilizers to reduce the leaching of mineral nutrients and greenhouse gas (N2O) emissions. Agronomy, 11(6), 1129.
• Dey, B., Ferdous, J., & Ahmed, R. (2024). Machine learning based recommendation of agricultural and horticultural crop farming in India under the regime of NPK, soil pH and three climatic variables. Heliyon, 10(3).
• Edwards, R., Padella, M., Giuntoli, J., Koeble, R., O’Connell, A., Bulgheroni, C., & Marelli, L. (2017). Definition of input data to assess GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation. Version 1c–July.
• FAO. 2023. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8166en
• Fan, D., He, W., Jiang, R., Song, D., Zou, G., Chen, Y., ... & Wang, X. (2022). Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers impact on nitrogen use efficiency and nitrous oxide emissions from an open-field vegetable system in North China. Plants, 12(1), 81.
• Hassan, M. U., Aamer, M., Mahmood, A., Awan, M. I., Barbanti, L., Seleiman, M. F., ... & Huang, G. (2022). Management strategies to mitigate N2O emissions in agriculture. Life, 12(3), 439.
• Jabed, M. A., & Murad, M. A. A. (2024). Crop yield prediction in agriculture: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning approaches, with insights for future research and sustainability. Heliyon, 10(24).
• Jin, Y., Wang, L., Song, Y., Zhu, J., Qin, M., Wu, L., ... & Hou, D. (2021). Integrated life cycle assessment for sustainable remediation of contaminated agricultural soil in China. Environmental science & technology, 55(17), 12032-12042.
• Jost, E., Schönhart, M., Mitter, H., Zoboli, O., & Schmid, E. (2025). Integrated modelling of fertilizer and climate change scenario impacts on agricultural production and nitrogen losses in Austria. Ecological Economics, 227, 108398.
• Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldu, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agri-culture: a survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 147: 70–90.
• Khanali, M., Akram, A., Behzadi, J., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K.W., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. 2021. Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm. Applied Energy 284:116342.
• Lampridi, M., Kateris, D., Sørensen, C. G., & Bochtis, D. (2020). Energy footprint of mechanized agricultural operations. Energies, 13(3), 769.
• Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochits, D. (2018). Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review. Sensors (Special Issue" Sensors in Agriculture 2018").
• Ma, Z., Yue, Y., Feng, M., Li, Y., Ma, X., Zhao, X., & Wang, S. (2019). Mitigation of ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching via loss control urea triggered H-bond forces. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 15140.
• Magrini, A., & Giambona, F. (2022). A composite indicator to assess sustainability of agriculture in European union countries. Social Indicators Research, 163(3), 1003-1036.
• Menegat, S., Ledo, A., & Tirado, R. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14490.
• Mukhtar, M., Ali, M. K. M., Ismail, M., Hamundu, F. M., Alimuddin, A., Akhtar, N., & Fudholi, A. (2020). Hybrid model in machine learning–robust regression applied for sustainability agriculture and food security. IJECE, 9(4), 101-113
• Na, R., Yoo, S. H., Lee, S. H., Choi, J. Y., Hur, S. O., Yoon, P. R., & Kim, K. S. (2024). The application of a smart nexus for agriculture in korea for assessing the holistic impacts of climate change. Sustainability, 16(3), 990.
• Naveen, K. R. (2020). Nvndvg/crop_mixed_type. nvndvg/crop_mixed_type. [Online]. Available: https:// github.com/nvndvg/crop_mixed_type
• Rosa, L., & Gabrielli, P. (2022). Energy and food security implications of transitioning synthetic nitrogen fertilizers to net-zero emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 18(1), 014008.
• Streimikis, J., & Baležentis, T. (2020). Agricultural sustainability assessment framework integrating sustainable development goals and interlinked priorities of environmental, climate and agriculture policies. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1702-1712.
• Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Nabiollahi, K., Rasoli, L., Kerry, R., & Scholten, T. (2020). Land suitability assessment and agricultural production sustainability using machine learning models. Agronomy, 10(4), 573.
• Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use: A review of emission factors and their variability. Journal of Environmental Management, 276, 111211.
• Wang, G., Wu, W., Fu, D., Xu, W., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y. 2021. Energy and exergy analyses of rice drying in a novel electric stationary bed grain-drying system with internal circulation of the drying medium. Foods 11:101.
• Xu, Y., Chou, J., Yang, F., Sun, M., Zhao, W., & Li, J. (2021). Assessing the sensitivity of main crop yields to climate change impacts in China. Atmosphere, 12(2), 172.
• Yahaya, S. M., Mahmud, A. A., Abdullahi, M., & Haruna, A. (2023). Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: A review. Pedosphere, 33(3), 385-406.