Determination of hydraulic conductivity and soil-water characteristic curve in different soil textures by mathematical equations
Abstract
Measuring soil hydraulic properties is essential in soil science, but direct measurements are often laborious, time-consuming, and costly. Therefore, alternative methods based on mathematical models have gained increasing attention. This study aimed to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and soil water characteristic curves (SWCC) for soils with different textures using various predictive models. Soil samples were collected from the Arpacı, Çanakçı, and Baharlı soil series in Adana, Türkiye. Twelve undisturbed and one disturbed sample were obtained from the 0–20 cm depth. Soil physical and chemical properties, including bulk density, porosity, pH, electrical conductivity, CaCO₃ content, organic matter, hydraulic conductivity, and pF curves, were determined. Soil water retention was measured at 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 5, and 15 atm pressure levels. Model selection for SWCC and hydraulic conductivity estimations was performed using the pFK model database integrated into the SIMONA program. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). For the Arpacı series, the Terleev and Sariyev model provided the best fit for SWCC and K(P) estimations (RMSE = 0.007453), whereas the van Genuchten model performed best for K(W) (RMSE = 0.041119). In the Çanakçı series, the Curry and Chen model showed the highest accuracy for SWCC prediction (RMSE = 0.003780), while the Terleev and Sariyev model was most suitable for K(P) (RMSE = 0.146915) and the van Genuchten model for K(W) (RMSE = 0.293829). For the Baharlı series, the Brooks and Corey model provided the best SWCC estimation (RMSE = 0.013715), whereas the Michurin model was most accurate for K(P) (RMSE = 0.000014) and the Avern model for K(W) (RMSE = 0.482353). The results indicate that selecting texture-specific models can improve the estimation of soil hydraulic properties and contribute to more accurate irrigation scheduling and water management practices.
Keywords
Hydraulic conductivity, Mathematical model, PF curve, Saturated soils, Texture
References
- Alves, R. D., de FN Gitirana Jr, G., & Vanapalli, S. K. (2020). Advances in the modeling of the soil–water characteristic curve using pore-scale analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 127, 103766.
- Amente, G., Baker, J. M., & Reece, C. F. (2000). Estimation of soil solution electrical conductivity from bulk soil electrical conductivity in sandy soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(6), 1931-1939.
- Arya, L. M., & Paris, J. F. (1981). A physicoempirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle‐size distribution and bulk density data. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45(6), 1023-1030.
- Blake, G. ꎬ., & Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, 363-375.
- Braud, I., Desprats, J. F., Ayral, P. A., Bouvier, C., & Vandervaere, J. P. (2017). Mapping topsoil field-saturated hydraulic conductivity from point measurements using different methods. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 65(3), 264.
- Breinstein, G., Zaslavski, B., Sarıyev, A., & Terleev, V. (1988). Toprak neminin dinamik hesaplanması için model ve veri teminatı. Sbornik nauçnıx trudov SXI, Omsk, 1988, 101-107.
- Brooks, R. H. & Corey, A. T. (1964). Hydraulic properties of porous medium and their relation to drainage design. Hydrology Papers, Colorado State University, 7(1), 26-28.
- Chen, K., He, X., Liang, F., & Sheng, D. (2024). Influences of ink-bottle effect evolution on water retention hysteresis of unsaturated soils: An experimental investigation. Engineering Geology, 330, 107409.
- Chin, K. B., Leong, E. C., & Rahardjo, H. (2010). A simplified method to estimate the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47(12), 1382-1400.
- Chou, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Soil-water characteristic curve and permeability coefficient prediction model for unsaturated loess considering freeze-thaw and dry-wet. Soils and Rocks, 44, e2021058320.
