Integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice: dynamics and economics
Abstract
Weeds are often the most severe problem in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) (DSR), causes reductions in yield and profitability. The traditional method of controlling rice weeds or manual weeding has several demerits as the practice is uneconomical and difficult. The effects of 10 different weed management practices were evaluated to identify the most effective and economical methods of managing weeds in DSR during in Nepal during the rainy season of 2010. Pendimethalin was applied pre-emergence where 2,4-D, bispyribac sodium, and oxadiargyl were applied post-emergence alone or combined with hand weeding. Sesbania (Sesbania aculeata Wild. Pers.) was co-cultured with rice and killed by 2,4-D. Weed emergence, density, and biomass per unit area of 3 weed types: broadleaf, sedges, and grasses were assessed during 20, 40, 60 days after seeding (DAS), and at harvest. Treatments were compared either to weedy check or weed-free control to determine weed control indices. A total of 42 weed species belonging to 27 genera and 11 families emerged across the growing season of rice. Most of the weeds were annual where broadleaf and sedges were dominant during the first two months, and grasses were dominant under flooding. Weeds reduced the rice yield by more than 80% in weedy-check with respect to weed-free control. A sequential application of pendimethalin as pre-emergence and bispyribac-sodium postemergence herbicides followed by a hand weeding at 45 DAS provided up to 85% weed control over weedy check than other weed control measures. However, that method found uneconomical when compared to the same without hand weeding because of the high cost of manual labor. Pendimethalin was effective in controlling early flush of weeds and bispyribac efficiently controlled weeds even after flooding turned out to be a less expensive method controlling in DSR. An integrated approach of weed management including both pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides can provide season-long weed control greater economic return.
Keywords
Direct-seeded rice,Weeds,Herbicides,Hand weeding,Benefit to cost ratio
References
- Balasubramanian, V., and Hill, J. (2000). Direct seeding of rice in Asia: emerging issues and strategic research needs for the 21st century. In: S. P. Pandey et al. (editors), direct seeding: research strategies and opportunities. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. p. 15–39.
- Bouman, B.A.M., and Tuong, T.P. (2001). Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agri. and Water Manag. 49:11–30.
- Brown, R.H. (1984). Physiological basis of crop growth and development. In: M.B. Teasar, editor, Growth of the green plant. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 153–173.
- Caton, B.P., Mortimor, M., Hill, J.E., and Johnson, D.E. (2010). A practical field guide to weeds of rice in Asia. 2nd edition. International Rice Research Institute, Las Banos, Philippines. Pp. 118.
- Chauhan, B.S. (2012a). Weed management in direct-seeded rice systems. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines. 20p.
- Chauhan, B.S. (2012b). Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Tech. 26:1–13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00105.1
- Dario, G.J.A., and Gallo, P.B. (1999). Weed control efficiency of the herbicide oxadiargyl in irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.). Scientia Agricola 56:33–38.
- Dhakal, M., Sah, S.K., McDonald, A., Regmi, A.P. (2015). Constraints and perception of weed management in direct seeded rice in terai of Nepal. J Agric. Environ. 16:103-111. doi:10.3126/aej.v16i0.19843
- Dickmann, R., Melgarelo, J., Loubiere, P., and Montagnon, M. (1997). Oxadiargyl: a novel herbicide for rice and sugarcane. In: Proceedings 1997, British Crop Protection Conference-Weeds, Brighton, UK, p. 51–57.
- Ganie, Z.A., Singh, S., and Singh, S. (2013). Effect of seed rate and weed control methods on yield of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Ind. J. Agron., 58:125-126.
