Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study

Year 2021, , 701 - 708, 15.12.2021

Mevlüt Aydın Mehmet Uğur Yıldırım Aynur Fayrap , Hakan Özdal

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Volume based pricing in irrigation is an important application method in solving excessive and illegal water use problems. It is essential to use a properly selected water meter to accurately measure the amount of water. In this study, the irrigation system performance of Kayack Water User Association (WUA) was comparatively analyzed for the years 2012 to 2017. The prepaid water meter has been used for water measurement in Kayacık irrigation scheme since 2015. While it could be irrigated on 11.754 ha in 2012, the irrigated area reached 19.528 ha in 2017. It was determined that there was a significant water saving and economic recovery after the installation of prepaid water meters in the irrigation scheme. The quantity of water, which was 7,414 m3ha-1 in 2012, decreased to 3,617 m3ha-1 in 2017. The cost recovery ratios were 76% and 107% in 2013 and 2017, respectively. Consequently, prepaid water meter usage provides so many advantages in service delivery, economics and productivity. In addition, the quantity of water discharged into the drainage canal has significantly decreased. It is recommended that prepaid water meter usage should be prevalence in irrigation operation.

Keywords

Measuring irrigation water, Prepaid water meter, Service delivery performance, Financial performance, Production performance

References

• Anonymous, (2001). Water Measurement Manuel. Chapter 4. Selection of Water Measuring Devices. Revised Printed, pp 4-13. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/wmm/index.htm .Washington.
• Anonymous, (2013). Evaluation Report of Irrigation Facilities Operated and Transferred by DSI for 2012. Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 462-478. Ankara. (In Turkish)
• Anonymous, (2018). Evaluation Report of Irrigation Facilities Operated and Transferred by DSI for 2017. Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 449-465. Ankara. (In Turkish).
• Baum, C.B., Dukes, M.D., Haman, DZ. (2012). “Selection and Use of Water Meters for Irrigation Water Measurement”. Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension, February.
• Beyribey, M. (1997). Devlet Sulama Şebekelerinde Sistem Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakultesi Yayınları, Ankara (In Turkish).
• Bos, G.B., Kselik R.A.L., Allen, G., Molden, D.J. (2009). Water Requirements for Irrigation and the Environment.118-119. Publisher: Springer Netherlands ISBN: 978-1-4020-8947-3,978- 1-4020-8948-0.
• Burt, C.M. (2007). Volumetric Irrigation Water Pricing Considerations. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 21-2.133-144 DOI: 10.1007/s10795-007-9025- 3.
• Chartzoulakis, K. and Bertaki, M. (2015). Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 4, 88 – 98. www.sciencedirect.com.
• Çakmak, E. H., (2010). Agricultural Water Pricing in Turkey. OECD. 1-24.
• Çakmak B., Kibaroglu, A., Kendirli, B., Gokalp, Z. (2010). Assessment of the irrigation performance of transferred schemes in Turkey: a case study analysis. Irrigation and Drainage 59-2, 138–149. Doi: 10.1002/ird.452.
• De Fraiture, C., Fayrap, A., Unver, O., Ragab, R. (2014). Integrated Water Management Approaches for Sustainable Food Production. Irrigation and Drainage, 63-2, Special Issue:First World Irrigation Forum: 143-272. DOI:10.1002/ird.1847.
• Golin, C., Cox, M., Brown, M., Thomas, V. (2015). The water efficiency gap. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 1-4, 315-324. ISSN: 2363-5037.
• Koç, C. (2013). A study on some parameters that can affect project irrigation efficiency in irrigation networks. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 62(5), 586-591. DOI: 10.1002/ird.1754.
• Levidov, L., Zaccaria, D., Maia, R. Vivas, E., Todorovic M. and Scardigno A. (2014). Improving water-efficient irrigation: Prospects and difficulties of innovative practices. Agricultural Water Management, 146, 84–94. Doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.012.
• Malano, H. and Burton, M. (2001). Guidelines For Benchmarkıng Performance In The Irrıgatıon And Drainage Sector. IPTRID Secretariat Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
• Molle, F. (2009). Water scarcity, prices and quotas: A review of evidence on irrigation volumetric pricing. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 23(1), 43-58. DOI: 10.1007/s10795-009-9065-y.
• Moll, F. and Berkof, J. (2018). Water Pricing in Irrigation: Mapping the Dabate in the Light of Experience. In: Moll, F. and Berkof, J., Irrigation Water Pricing The Gap Between Theory and Practice. Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture series 4. London, ISBN 978-1-84593-292-3 (alk. paper) pp 21-94.
• Sedara, O. and Sedara, A. (2020). Effect of varying water applications on growth, yield and water use efficiency of okra under drip irrigation in Akure, Ondo state, Nigeria International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences 4 (4), 513-519. DOI: 10.31015/jaefs.2020.4.16.
• Ünver, O. and Gupta, R. K. (2003), Water Pricing: Issues and Options in Turkey. Water Resources Development, 19(2), 311–330.