Artificial Intelligence Bias and the Amplification of Inequalities in the Labor Market

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now present in nearly every aspect of our daily lives. Furthermore, while this AI augmentation is generally beneficial, or at worst, nonproblematic, some instances warrant attention. In this study, we argue that AI bias resulting from training data sets in the labor market can significantly amplify minor inequalities, which later in life manifest as permanently lost opportunities and social status and wealth segregation. The Matthew effect is responsible for this phenomenon, except that the focus is not on the rich getting richer, but on the poor becoming even poorer. We demonstrate how frequently changing expectations for skills, competencies, and knowledge lead to AI failing to make impartial hiring decisions. Specifically, the bias in the training data sets used by AI affects the results, causing the disadvantaged to be overlooked while the privileged are frequently chosen. This simple AI bias contributes to growing social inequalities by reinforcing the Matthew effect, and it does so at much faster rates than previously. We assess these threats by studying data from various labor fields, including justice, security, healthcare, human resource management, and education.

Keywords

• artificial intelligence
• bias
• Matthew effect
• social inequality
• misinformation

References

1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. google scholar
2. Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K.N., & Hamouda, A.M. (2023). Re-thinking data strategy and integration for artificial intelligence: Concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7082. google scholar
3. Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K.N., & Hamouda, A.M. (2023). Re-thinking data strategy and integration for artificial intelligence: Concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7082. google scholar
4. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. google scholar
5. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. google scholar
6. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50. google scholar
7. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31-50. google scholar
8. Aquino, Y. S. J. (2023). Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data-driven diagnostic tools. Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(7), 439-442. google scholar

9. Aquino, Y. S. J. (2023). Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data-driven diagnostic tools. Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(7), 439-442. google scholar
10. Babic, B., Gerke, S., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2021). Beware explanations from AI in health care. Science, 373(6552), 284-286. google scholar
11. Babic, B., Gerke, S., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2021). Beware explanations from AI in health care. Science, 373(6552), 284-286. google scholar
12. Bagaric, M. (2016). Three things that a baseline study shows don’t cause indigenous over-imprisonment: Three things that might but shouldn’t and three reforms that will reduce indigenous over-imprisonment. Harvard J Racial & Ethnic Just, 103. google scholar
13. Bagaric, M. (2016). Three things that a baseline study shows don’t cause indigenous over-imprisonment: Three things that might but shouldn’t and three reforms that will reduce indigenous over-imprisonment. Harvard J Racial & Ethnic Just, 103. google scholar
14. Bagaric, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2019). Erasing the bias against using artificial intelligence to predict future criminality: Algorithms are color blind and never dash. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 88(4), 1037-1081. google scholar
15. Bagaric, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2019). Erasing the bias against using artificial intelligence to predict future criminality: Algorithms are color blind and never dash. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 88(4), 1037-1081. google scholar
16. Bagaric, M., Svilar, J., Bull, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2022). The solution to the pervasive bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system: Transparent and fair artificial intelligence. American Criminal Law Review, 59(95), 95-148. google scholar
17. Bagaric, M., Svilar, J., Bull, M., Hunter, D., & Stobbs, N. (2022). The solution to the pervasive bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system: Transparent and fair artificial intelligence. American Criminal Law Review, 59(95), 95-148. google scholar
18. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052-1092. google scholar
19. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052-1092. google scholar
20. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A.D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671-732. google scholar
21. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A.D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671-732. google scholar
22. Bates, D.W., Saria, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Shah, A., & Escobar, G. (2014). Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Affairs, 33(7), 1123-1131. google scholar
23. Bates, D.W., Saria, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Shah, A., & Escobar, G. (2014). Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Affairs, 33(7), 1123-1131. google scholar
24. Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., & Song, Y. (2023). Are algorithms biased in education? Exploring racial bias in predicting community college student success. Ed Working Paper No. 23-717. Annenberg Institute: Brown University. google scholar
25. Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., & Song, Y. (2023). Are algorithms biased in education? Exploring racial bias in predicting community college student success. Ed Working Paper No. 23-717. Annenberg Institute: Brown University. google scholar
26. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publishing. google scholar
27. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publishing. google scholar
28. Bozkurt, V., & Gursoy, D. (2023). The artificial intelligence paradox: Opportunity or threat for humanity?, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2297114 google scholar
29. Bozkurt, V., & Gursoy, D. (2023). The artificial intelligence paradox: Opportunity or threat for humanity?, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2297114 google scholar
30. Castelluccia, C., & Le Metayer, D. (2019). Understanding algorithmic decision-making: opportunities and challenges. European Parliament. google scholar
31. Castelluccia, C., & Le Metayer, D. (2019). Understanding algorithmic decision-making: opportunities and challenges. European Parliament. google scholar
32. Celi L. A., Cellini, J., Charpignon, M. L., Dee, E. C., Dernoncourt, F., Eber, R. et al (2022). Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities: A global review. PLOS Digit Health, 31; 1(3), e0000022. google scholar
33. Celi L. A., Cellini, J., Charpignon, M. L., Dee, E. C., Dernoncourt, F., Eber, R. et al (2022). Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities: A global review. PLOS Digit Health, 31; 1(3), e0000022. google scholar
34. Charpignon, M. L., Byers, J., Cabral, S., Celi, L. A., Fernandes, F., Gallifant, J. et al. (2023). Critical bias in critical care devices. Critical Care Clinics, 39(4), 795-813. google scholar
35. Charpignon, M. L., Byers, J., Cabral, S., Celi, L. A., Fernandes, F., Gallifant, J. et al. (2023). Critical bias in critical care devices. Critical Care Clinics, 39(4), 795-813. google scholar
36. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. The Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. google scholar
37. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. The Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. google scholar
38. Coleman, J. S., Campbell , E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. US Office of Education. google scholar
39. Coleman, J. S., Campbell , E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. US Office of Education. google scholar
40. Colon-Rodriguez, C. J. (2023, 12 July). Shedding light on healthcare algorithmic and artificial intelligence bias. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. Retrieved from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/news/shedding-light-healthcare-algorithmic-and-artificial-intelligence-bias google scholar
41. Colon-Rodriguez, C. J. (2023, 12 July). Shedding light on healthcare algorithmic and artificial intelligence bias. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. Retrieved from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/news/shedding-light-healthcare-algorithmic-and-artificial-intelligence-bias google scholar
42. Dressel, J., & Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4, eaao5580. google scholar
43. Dressel, J., & Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4, eaao5580. google scholar
44. Edwards, B., & Cheok, A. D. (2018). Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(4), 345-360. google scholar
45. Edwards, B., & Cheok, A. D. (2018). Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(4), 345-360. google scholar
46. Erdi, P. (2020). Ranking: The unwritten rules of the social game we all play. Oxford University Press. google scholar
47. Erdi, P. (2020). Ranking: The unwritten rules of the social game we all play. Oxford University Press. google scholar
48. European Commission (2022). Mitigating diversity biases ofAI in the labor market. Horizon Europe Project Report. google scholar
49. European Commission (2022). Mitigating diversity biases ofAI in the labor market. Horizon Europe Project Report. google scholar
50. European Network Against Racism (2020). Artificial intelligence in HR: How to address racial biases and algorithmic discrimination in HR?. ENAR Publishing. google scholar
51. European Network Against Racism (2020). Artificial intelligence in HR: How to address racial biases and algorithmic discrimination in HR?. ENAR Publishing. google scholar
52. European Parliament (2020). Skills and jobs for future labour markets: European policies and Skills Agendas 2010-2020. EMPL in Focus. google scholar
53. European Parliament (2020). Skills and jobs for future labour markets: European policies and Skills Agendas 2010-2020. EMPL in Focus. google scholar
54. Franca, T. J. F., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence applied to potential assessment and talent identification in an organizational context. Heliyon, 9(4), e14694. google scholar
55. Franca, T. J. F., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence applied to potential assessment and talent identification in an organizational context. Heliyon, 9(4), e14694. google scholar
56. Hale, K. E. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to circumvent the teacher shortage in special education: A phenomenological investigation. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University, USA. google scholar
57. Hale, K. E. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to circumvent the teacher shortage in special education: A phenomenological investigation. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University, USA. google scholar
58. Harari, Y. N. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550(19), 324-327. google scholar
59. Harari, Y. N. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550(19), 324-327. google scholar
60. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621-653). Globethics Publications. google scholar
61. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621-653). Globethics Publications. google scholar
62. IFOW (2020). Artificial intelligence in hiring: Assessing impacts on equality. Institute for the Future of Work. Retrieved from https://assets-global.website-files.com/64d5f73a7fc5e8a240310c4d/64d5f73b7fc5e8a240310ea0_5f71d338891671faa84de443_IFOW%2B-%2BAssessing%2Bimpacts%2Bon%2Bequality.pdf google scholar
63. IFOW (2020). Artificial intelligence in hiring: Assessing impacts on equality. Institute for the Future of Work. Retrieved from https://assets-global.website-files.com/64d5f73a7fc5e8a240310c4d/64d5f73b7fc5e8a240310ea0_5f71d338891671faa84de443_IFOW%2B-%2BAssessing%2Bimpacts%2Bon%2Bequality.pdf google scholar
64. ILO (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A challenge for the human-centred agenda?. ILO Working Paper 95. google scholar
65. ILO (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A challenge for the human-centred agenda?. ILO Working Paper 95. google scholar
66. Kamulegeya, L. H., Okello, M., Bwanika, J. M., et al. (2019). Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: A case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. African Health Sciences, 23(2), 753-763. google scholar
67. Kamulegeya, L. H., Okello, M., Bwanika, J. M., et al. (2019). Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: A case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. African Health Sciences, 23(2), 753-763. google scholar
68. King, M. (2022). Harmful biases in artificial intelligence. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(11), E48. google scholar
69. King, M. (2022). Harmful biases in artificial intelligence. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(11), E48. google scholar
70. Kizilcec, R.F., & Lee, H. (2022). Algorithmic fairness in education. In Holmes W., Porayska-Pomsta, K. (Eds), The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 174-202). Taylor & Francis. google scholar
71. Kizilcec, R.F., & Lee, H. (2022). Algorithmic fairness in education. In Holmes W., Porayska-Pomsta, K. (Eds), The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 174-202). Taylor & Francis. google scholar
72. Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Bus Res, 13, 795-848. google scholar
73. Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Bus Res, 13, 795-848. google scholar
74. Larrazabal, A. J., Nieto, N., Peterson, V., Milone, D. H., & Ferrante, E. (2020). Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117(23), 12592-12594. google scholar
75. Larrazabal, A. J., Nieto, N., Peterson, V., Milone, D. H., & Ferrante, E. (2020). Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117(23), 12592-12594. google scholar
76. Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019). Early co-authorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers, Nature Communications, 10, 51-70. google scholar
77. Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., & Livan, G. (2019). Early co-authorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers, Nature Communications, 10, 51-70. google scholar
78. Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), 14-19. google scholar
79. Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), 14-19. google scholar
80. Mahmud, H. A. K. M., Islam, N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. google scholar
81. Mahmud, H. A. K. M., Islam, N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. google scholar
82. Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. google scholar
83. Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. google scholar
84. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35. google scholar
85. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35. google scholar
86. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 53-63. google scholar
87. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 53-63. google scholar
88. Mittermaier, M., Raza, M. M., Kvedar, J. C. (2023). Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: Challenges and mitigation strategies. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6, 113. google scholar
89. Mittermaier, M., Raza, M. M., Kvedar, J. C. (2023). Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: Challenges and mitigation strategies. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6, 113. google scholar
90. Napierala, J., Kvetan, V. (2023). Changing job skills in a changing world. In: Bertoni, E., Fontana, M., Gabrielli, L., Signorelli, S., Vespe, M. (eds) Handbook of computational social science for policy (pp. 243-259). Springer, Cham. google scholar
91. Napierala, J., Kvetan, V. (2023). Changing job skills in a changing world. In: Bertoni, E., Fontana, M., Gabrielli, L., Signorelli, S., Vespe, M. (eds) Handbook of computational social science for policy (pp. 243-259). Springer, Cham. google scholar
92. Nazer, L. H., Zatarah, R., Waldrip, S., Ke, J. X. C., Moukheiber, M., Khanna, A. K., et al. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLOS Digital Health, 2(6), e0000278. google scholar
93. Nazer, L. H., Zatarah, R., Waldrip, S., Ke, J. X. C., Moukheiber, M., Khanna, A. K., et al. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLOS Digital Health, 2(6), e0000278. google scholar
94. Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., et al. (2020). Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems-an introductory survey. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov, 10(3), e1356. google scholar
95. Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., et al. (2020). Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems-an introductory survey. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov, 10(3), e1356. google scholar
96. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366, 447-453. google scholar
97. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366, 447-453. google scholar
98. Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R., Gowda, S., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). Population validity for educational data mining models: A case study in affect detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 487-501. google scholar
99. Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R., Gowda, S., Heffernan, N., & Heffernan, C. (2014). Population validity for educational data mining models: A case study in affect detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 487-501. google scholar
100. OECD (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing. google scholar
101. OECD (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing. google scholar
102. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Books. google scholar
103. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Books. google scholar
104. Oracle (2019). AI in human resources: The time is now. Retrieved from https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/applications/hcm/oracle-ai-in-hr-wp.pdf google scholar
105. Oracle (2019). AI in human resources: The time is now. Retrieved from https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/applications/hcm/oracle-ai-in-hr-wp.pdf google scholar
106. Özer, M., & Perc, M. (2022). Improving equality in the education system of Türkiye. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 2022, 42(2), 325-334. google scholar
107. Özer, M., & Perc, M. (2022). Improving equality in the education system of Türkiye. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 2022, 42(2), 325-334. google scholar
108. Özer, M. (2023). The Matthew effect Turkish education system. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(4), 704-712. google scholar
109. Özer, M. (2023). The Matthew effect Turkish education system. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(4), 704-712. google scholar
110. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. google scholar
111. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. google scholar
112. Perc, M., Özer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications, 5, 61. google scholar
113. Perc, M., Özer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications, 5, 61. google scholar
114. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28, 31-38. google scholar
115. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28, 31-38. google scholar
116. Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (Eds.). (2023). Digital transformation of educational institutions accelerated by covid-19: A digital dynamic capabilities approach. Emerald Publishing. google scholar
117. Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (Eds.). (2023). Digital transformation of educational institutions accelerated by covid-19: A digital dynamic capabilities approach. Emerald Publishing. google scholar
118. Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press. New York. google scholar
119. Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press. New York. google scholar
120. Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1-22. google scholar
121. Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1-22. google scholar
122. Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nature Med, 27, 2176-2182. google scholar
123. Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2021). Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nature Med, 27, 2176-2182. google scholar
124. Smith, H. (2020). Algorithmic bias: should students pay the price? AI & Society, 35, 1077-1078. google scholar
125. Smith, H. (2020). Algorithmic bias: should students pay the price? AI & Society, 35, 1077-1078. google scholar
126. Silberg, J., & Manyika, J. (2019). Notes from the AI frontier: Tackling bias in AI (and in humans). McKinsey Global Institute. google scholar
127. Silberg, J., & Manyika, J. (2019). Notes from the AI frontier: Tackling bias in AI (and in humans). McKinsey Global Institute. google scholar
128. Srinivas, N. (2023, February 24). The ethical debate of AI in criminal justice: Balancing efficiency and human rights. Manage Engine Insights. google scholar
129. Srinivas, N. (2023, February 24). The ethical debate of AI in criminal justice: Balancing efficiency and human rights. Manage Engine Insights. google scholar
130. Retrieved from https://insights.manageengine.com/artificial-intelligence/the-ethical-debate-of-ai-in-criminal-justice-balancing-efficiency-and-human-rights// google scholar
131. Retrieved from https://insights.manageengine.com/artificial-intelligence/the-ethical-debate-of-ai-in-criminal-justice-balancing-efficiency-and-human-rights// google scholar
132. Stefan, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence and its impact on young people. Seminar Report from the Council of Europe. google scholar
133. Stefan, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence and its impact on young people. Seminar Report from the Council of Europe. google scholar
134. Storm, K. I. L., Reiss, L. K., Guenther, E. A., Clar-Novak, M., & Muhr, S.L. (2023). Unconscious bias in the HRM literature: Towards a critical-reflexive approach. Human Resource Management Review, 33(3), 100969. google scholar
135. Storm, K. I. L., Reiss, L. K., Guenther, E. A., Clar-Novak, M., & Muhr, S.L. (2023). Unconscious bias in the HRM literature: Towards a critical-reflexive approach. Human Resource Management Review, 33(3), 100969. google scholar
136. Suleyman, M. (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. Crown: New York. google scholar
137. Suleyman, M. (2023). The coming wave: Technology, power, and the twenty-first century’s greatest dilemma. Crown: New York. google scholar
138. Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gür, B. S., Perc, M., & Özer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economics culture and Society, 61, 41-64. google scholar
139. Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gür, B. S., Perc, M., & Özer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economics culture and Society, 61, 41-64. google scholar
140. Tuffaha, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence bias on human resource management functions: Systematic literature review and future research directions. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 11(4), 35-58. google scholar
141. Tuffaha, M. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence bias on human resource management functions: Systematic literature review and future research directions. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 11(4), 35-58. google scholar
142. Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023). Power and politics in framing bias in artificial intelligence policy. Review of Policy Research, 40, 665-687. google scholar
143. Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023). Power and politics in framing bias in artificial intelligence policy. Review of Policy Research, 40, 665-687. google scholar
144. UNESCO (2023). The teachers we need for the education we want: The global imperative to reverse the teacher shortage. UNESCO & Education 2030 Factsheet. google scholar
145. UNESCO (2023). The teachers we need for the education we want: The global imperative to reverse the teacher shortage. UNESCO & Education 2030 Factsheet. google scholar
146. Varsha, P. S. (2023). How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems-A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3, 100165. google scholar
147. Varsha, P. S. (2023). How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems-A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3, 100165. google scholar
148. Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023). Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports, 13, 15737. google scholar
149. Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023). Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports, 13, 15737. google scholar
150. Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. M. (2023). Ethics and governance of trustwothy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 7. google scholar
151. Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. M. (2023). Ethics and governance of trustwothy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 7. google scholar
152. Zuckerman, H. A. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press. google scholar
153. Zuckerman, H. A. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press. google scholar
154. Zuckerman, H. (1989). Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In Mongardini, C., Tabboni, S. (Eds), Robert K. Merton and contemporary sociology (pp. 153-176). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. google scholar
155. Zuckerman, H. (1989). Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In Mongardini, C., Tabboni, S. (Eds), Robert K. Merton and contemporary sociology (pp. 153-176). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. google scholar