The Effect Of Collaborative Problem Solving Strategies And Cognitive Style On Students' Problem Solving Abilities

Year 2020, , 1618 - 1630, 15.12.2020

Agus Setiawan , İ Degeng , Cholis Sa'dıjah , Henry Praherdhiono

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.812781

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to identify the effect of collaborative problem solving (CPS) on students' problem-solving abilities with different cognitive styles, including field-dependent (FI) and field-independent (FD). This is a quasi-experimental research with a 2x2 factorial design. The study used 109 students of public junior high school 3 Mesuji, Indonesia, as samples. The data of problem-solving abilities were obtained from essay tests, and cognitive style data were obtained from the Group Embeded Figure Test (GEFT). The data is analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of this study show the following, 1) there is a significant difference in problem-solving abilities between students treated with collaborative problem solving strategies and problem-based learning, 2) there are significant differences on problem-solving abilities between students who have field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles, 3) there is a significant interaction between different instructional strategies (collaborative problem solving and problem-based learning) and cognitive styles (field-dependent and field-independent) on problem-solving abilities.

Keywords

problem-solving abilities, collaborative problem solving, cognitive style

References

• Agboghoroma, T. E. (2009). Interaction Effects of Instructional Mode and School Setting on Students’ Knowledge of Integrated Science. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 2(2), 67–75. Retrieved from http://www.ijsre.com
• Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21 st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155.
• Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure Of Intuitionanalysis For Organizational Research. Journal of Managmt Studies, 33(1), 119–135.
• Anderson, J. (2009). Mathematics Curriculum Development and the Role of Problem Solving. In Australian Curriculum Studies Association Conference. Retrieved from https://www.acsa.edu.au/
• Armstrong, S. J., Cools, E., & Sadler-smith, E. (2011). Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x
• Bendall, R. C. A., Galpin, A., Marrow, L. P., & Cassidy, S. (2016). Cognitive style : time to experiment Cognitive Style: Time to Experiment. Frontiers In Psychology, 7, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01786
• Bloom, B. S. (1982). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Budiyono. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press.
• Davis, G. A. (2006). Learning style and personality type preferences of community development extension educators. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(1), 90–99.
• Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran, klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung: Kalam Hidup Aras Media.
• Dembo, N. H. (1981). Teaching of Learning: Applying educational psychology inthe classroom. California: Gooh Year Pub. Company. Inc.
• Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children ’ s problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X23411
• Garton, B., Dyer, J. E., & King, B. O. (2000). The Use Of Learning Styles And Admission Criteria In Predicting Academic Performance And Retention Of College Freshmen. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2000.02046
• Harding, S. E., Griffin, P. E., Awwal, N., & Scoular, C. (2017). Measuring Collaborative Problem Solving Using Mathematics-Based Tasks. AERA Open, 3(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417728046
• Harris, D. (2008). A comparative study of the effect of collaborative problem solving in a massively multiplayer online game (MMOG) on individual achievement. Te University of San Francisco. Retrieved from htps://repository.usfca.edu/diss/260
• Jitendra, A. K., Petersen-brown, S., Lein, A. E., Zaslofsky, A. F., Kunkel, A. K., Jung, P., & Egan, A. M. (2015). Teaching Mathematical Word Problem Solving : The Quality of Evidence for Strategy Instruction Priming the Problem Structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
• Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. dan. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 [Regulation. Retrieved from http://www.datadikdasmen.com/2019/01/unduh-pdf-permendikbud-nomor-37-tahun.html
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundation of Behavioral Research 4th. USA: Holt, Reinnar & Winston,Inc.
• Kheirzadeh, S., & Kassaian, Z. (2011). Field-dependence / independence as a Factor Affecting Performance on Listening Comprehension Sub-skills : the Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.188-195
• Khodadady, E., Gholami, S., & Bagheri, M. S. (2013). Relationship between VAK Learning Styles and Problem Solving Styles regarding Gender and Students Fields of Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 700–706. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4.700-706
• Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549–579. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/15326900701399897
• Krulik, S., Rudnick, J., & Milou, E. (2003). Mathematic Teaching in Middle School a Practical Guide. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Lin, L., Mills, L. A., & Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Collaborative Problem Solving in Shared Space. In 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA) (pp. 233–239).
• Lu, H., & Lin, P. (2017). A Study of the Impact of Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies on Students ’ Performance of Simulation -Based Learning — A Case of Network Basic Concepts Course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(5), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.5.895
• Luckin, R., Baines, E., Cukurova, M., Holmes, W., Mann, M., Berg, E., … Santos, H. (2017). Making the case for collaborative problem-solving. London: NESTA.
• Mabilangan, R. A., Auxencia, A., & Belecina, R. R. (2011). Problem Solving Strategies of High School Students on Non-Routine Problems : A Case Study. Computer Science, 23–46.
• Mancy, R., & Reid, N. (2004). Aspects of cognitive style and programming. In 16th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group. Retrieved from www.ppig.org/
• Mathematics, N. C. of T. of. (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Motallebzadeh, K., & Kafi, Z. (2014). Place-Based Education: Does it Improve 21st Century Skills?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.89
• Nahdi, D. S. (2017). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Collaborative Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(1), 20–29.
• OECD. (2016). Pisa 2015 Results Excellence And Equity In Education (Vol. I). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, (July), 131–188. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en
• OECD. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/
• P21. (2015). P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
• Pusat Penialaian Pendidikan. (2019). Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. Retrieved from https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id
• Pramusinta, Y., Setyosari, P., & Widiati, U. (2019). Exploring Metacognitive and Critical Thinking Skills of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers through Discovery Learning Method by Integrating Various Cognitive Styles. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(4), 999–1017. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.614028
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm Of Instructional Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
• Saleh, K., Yuwono, I., Rahman, A., & Sa’dijah, C. (2016). Errors analysis solving problems analogies by Newman procedure using analogical reasoning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 17–26. Retrieved from http://aajhss.org/index.php/ijhss
• Santosa, E. B., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The Effects of Mobile Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Improve Problem Solving and Achievements. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 325–342. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.656642
• Sirin, R. N., & Güzel, A. (2006). The Relationship Between Learning Styles And Problem Solving Skills Among College Students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(1), 255–264.
• Stephen, U. S. (2016). Interaction Effects Of Cognitive Style And Instructional Stategy On Student’s Knowledge Of Physics In Akwa Ibom State Secondary Schools. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 5(2), 8–13.
• Suarsana, I. M., Lestari, I. A. P. D., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019). The Effect of Online Problem Posing on Students Problem-Solving Abilitiy in Mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 809–820.
• Sudarman, Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Dwiyogo, W. D. (2016). The Effect of Learning Strategy and Cognitive Style toward Mathematical Problem Solving Learning Outcomes. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-060304137143
• Sumaji, Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, & Sisworo. (2019). Students’ problem in communicating mathematical problem solving of Geometry. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (pp. 2–11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012128
• Susilowati, D., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyosari, P., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Effect of collaborative problem solving assisted by advance organisers and cognitive style on learning outcomes in computer programming. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 17(1), 35–41.
• Tindowen, D. J. C., Bassig, J. M., & Cagurangan, J. A. (2017). Twenty-First-Century Skills of Alternative Learning System Learners. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017726116
• Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting Education Research. Fifth Edition. New York: Harcout Brace College.
• Vendiagrys, L., Junaedi, I., & Masrukan. (2015). Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Setipe TIMSS Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(1), 34–41. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
• Wiltshire, T. J., Rosch, K., Fiorella, L., & Fiore, S. M. (2014). Training for Collaborative Problem Solving: Improving Team Process and Performance through Metacognitive Prompting. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 58, pp. 1154–1158). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581241
• Witkin, H. A. (1978). Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation. Worcester: MA: Clark Univer- sity Press.
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.
• Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Yin, K. Y. (2015). Collaborative Problem Solving Promotes Students ’ Interest. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 16(1), 158–168.
• Yudiernawati, A., Setyosari, P., Degeng, I. N. ., & Rudianto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Prestasi Belajar Aplikasi Proses Keperawatan pada. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(1), 31–40.
• Zevenbergen, R., Dole, S., & Wright, R. J. (2004). Teaching Mathematics in Primary Schools. Sidney: Allen and Unwin.