Research Article

R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners

Volume: 5 Number: 4 December 31, 2021
EN

R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners

Abstract

R1234yf is a synthetic HFO refrigerant co-developed as a replacement refrigerant for R134a in automotive air conditioning applications. Thus, in this study, alternatives to the R134a refrigerant that were removed from the newly produced devices were examined. The performance of the cooling processes of R1234yf and R744 refrigerant gases was compared with that of R134a. A simulation model was first developed. This simulation model was validated with experimental results. Analysis was conducted for both cooling and heating modes. In the case of cooling, evaporation temperature was 5 °C–7.5 °C, condenser, or gas cooler outlet temperature was 35 °C–50 °C and the cooling load was 10 kW. In heating mode, evaporation temperature was −4 °C–12 °C, condenser, or gas cooler outlet temperature was 45 °C–50 °C and the heating load was 13.5 kW. The results were analyzed in terms of the coefficient of performance (COP), compressor power consumption, and compressor discharge temperature. In terms of COP and compressor power consumption, R134a gave the best results in all cases. R1234yf gave the closest results to R134a. In terms of compressor discharge temperature, which affects the lifetime and lubrication quality of the compressor, R1234yf gave the lowest temperatures in all cases.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] European Commission. Directive 2006/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 relating to emissions from air-conditioning systems in motor vehicles and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC. 2006. p. 12–8
  2. [2] Calm, JM, Hourahan, GC. Physical, Safety, and Environmental Data for Current and Alternative Refrigerants. Refrigeration for Sustainable Development. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Refrigeration, 2011.08.21-26, International Institute of Refrigeration, Czech Republic.
  3. [3] Chen, J, Zhao, Y, Qi, Z. New developments in mobile air conditioning systems in China. Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China 2011; 5(1): 53–8. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-010-0137-3
  4. [4] Zhao, Y, Qi, Z, Chen, J, Xu, B, He, B. Experimental analysis of the low-GWP refrigerant R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a typical mobile air conditioning system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 2012; 226(11): 2713–25. DOI: 10.1177/0954406211435583
  5. [5] Navarro-Esbrí, J, Mendoza-Miranda, JM, Mota-Babiloni, A, Barragán-Cervera, A, Belman-Flores, JM. Experimental analysis of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a vapor compression system. International Journal of Refrigeration 2013; 36(3): 870–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2012.12.014
  6. [6] Cho, H, Lee, H, Park, C. Performance characteristics of an automobile air conditioning system with internal heat exchanger using refrigerant R1234yf. Applied Thermal Engineering 2013; 61(2): 563–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.08.030
  7. [7] Aral, MC, Suhermanto, M, Hosoz, M. Performance evaluation of an automotive air conditioning and heat pump system using R1234yf and R134a. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 2021; 27(1): 44–60. DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2020.1776067
  8. [8] Lee, Y, Jung, D. A brief performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a in a bench tester for automobile applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 2012; 35(1): 240–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.004

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Mechanical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

June 8, 2021

Acceptance Date

October 25, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 4

APA
Onan, C., & Erdem, S. (2021). R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners. Journal of Energy Systems, 5(4), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.949753
AMA
1.Onan C, Erdem S. R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners. Journal of Energy Systems. 2021;5(4):284-295. doi:10.30521/jes.949753
Chicago
Onan, Cenk, and Serkan Erdem. 2021. “R1234yf and R744 As Alternatives to R134a at Mobile Air Conditioners”. Journal of Energy Systems 5 (4): 284-95. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.949753.
EndNote
Onan C, Erdem S (December 1, 2021) R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners. Journal of Energy Systems 5 4 284–295.
IEEE
[1]C. Onan and S. Erdem, “R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners”, Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 284–295, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.30521/jes.949753.
ISNAD
Onan, Cenk - Erdem, Serkan. “R1234yf and R744 As Alternatives to R134a at Mobile Air Conditioners”. Journal of Energy Systems 5/4 (December 1, 2021): 284-295. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.949753.
JAMA
1.Onan C, Erdem S. R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners. Journal of Energy Systems. 2021;5:284–295.
MLA
Onan, Cenk, and Serkan Erdem. “R1234yf and R744 As Alternatives to R134a at Mobile Air Conditioners”. Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 284-95, doi:10.30521/jes.949753.
Vancouver
1.Cenk Onan, Serkan Erdem. R1234yf and R744 as alternatives to R134a at mobile air conditioners. Journal of Energy Systems. 2021 Dec. 1;5(4):284-95. doi:10.30521/jes.949753

Cited By

Journal of Energy Systems is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0