GÜVENLİ YAPAY ZEKÂ SİSTEMLERİ İÇİN İNSAN DENETİMLİ BİR MODEL GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Abstract

Yapay Zekâ, gerek günümüz, gerekse geleceğin en etkin araştırma alanlarından birisi olarak bilinmektedir.  Ancak Yapay Zekâ’nın hızlı yükselişi ve otonom bir şekilde bütün gerçek dünya problemlerini çözebilir potansiyele sahip olması, çeşitli endişeleri de beraberinde getirmiştir. Bazı bilim insanları, zeki sistemlerin ilerleyen süreçte insanlığı tehdit edebilecek düzeye gelebileceğini ve bu nedenle çeşitli önlemlerin alınması gerektiğini düşünmektedir. Bu nedenle Makine Etiği ya da Yapay Zekâ Güvenliği gibi birçok alt-araştırma alanı da zaman içerisinde ortaya çıkmıştır. Açıklamalar bağlamında bu çalışmanın amacı da, insan denetimini de içeren, zeki etmen ve Makine Öğrenmesi odaklı önlemleri bünyesinde barındıran, güvenli bir zeki sistem modeli önermektir. Çalışmada Yapay Zekâ Güvenliği odaklı temel konularla birlikte önerilen modelin detaylarına ilişkin açıklamalar sunulmuş ve potansiyeli hakkında değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. Modelin geleceğin güvenli Yapay Zekâ sistemlerine ilham kaynağı olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Yapay Zeka,Yapay Zeka Güvenliği,Etmen Tabanlı Sistemler,Makine Öğrenmesi,Yapay Zeka'nın Geleceği

DEVELOPING A HUMAN CONTROLLED MODEL FOR SAFE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is known as one of the most effective research field of nowadays and the future. But rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence and its potential to solve all real world problems autonomously, it has caused also several anxieties. Some scientists think that intelligent systems can reach to a level, which is dangerous for the humankind so because of that some precautions should be taken. So, many sub-research fields like Machine Ethics or Artificial Intelligence Safety have appeared in time. In the context of the explanations so far, objective of this study is to suggest a secure intelligent model including human control and also precautions based on intelligent agent and Machine Learning. In the study, essential subjects regarding Artificial Intelligence Safety and details of the suggested model have been provided and also some evaluations about its potential have been done. It is though that this model can be an inspiration for safe Artificial Intelligence systems of the future.

Keywords

• Artificial Intelligence,Artificial Intelligence Safety,Agent Based Systems,Machine Learning,Future of Artificial Intelligence

References

1. Abbeel, P., Ng, A.Y., 2011. Inverse Reinforcement Learning. In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (pp. 554-558). Springer US.
2. Alpaydın, E., 2014. Introduction to Machine Learning. MIT Press.
3. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., Mané, D., 2016. Concrete Problems in AI Safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
4. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L., 2007. Machine Ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Magazine, 28(4), 15.
5. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L. (Eds.)., 2011. Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
6. Armstrong, M.S., Orseau, L., 2016. Safely Interruptible Agents. Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
7. Arnold, T., Kasenberg, D., Scheutz, M., 2017. Value Alignment or Misalignment–What will Keep Systems Accountable. In 3rd International Workshop on AI, Ethics, and Society.
8. Ashrafian, H., 2015. Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: Innovating beyond rights. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 317-326.

9. Asimov, I., 2004. I, Robot (Vol. 1). ‘Güncel Bir Basım’. Spectra.
10. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Rahwan, I., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F. 2018. Moral Machine. MIT Media Lab. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 7 Şubat 2018): https://www.media.mit.edu/research/groups/10005/moral-machine
11. Barnett, D., 2017. The robots are coming – but will they really take all our jobs?. Independent – Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/robots-are-coming-but-will-they-take-our-jobs-uk-artificial-intelligence-doctor-who-a8080501.html
12. Bostrom, N., 2002. Existential Risks. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 9(1), 1-31.
13. Bostrom, N., 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. OUP, Oxford.
14. Brady, R., 2017. The Doctor in the Machine: How AI Is Saving Lives in Healthcare. SingularityHub. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): https://singularityhub.com/2017/11/30/the-doctor-in-the-machine-how-ai-is-saving-lives-in-healthcare/#sm.000077d60e4hhdn5t0g1x8tdyp8t4
15. Cellan-Jones, R., 2014. Hawking: Yapay zeka insanlığın sonunu getirebilir (Türkçe). BBC Türkçe – Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 3 Şubat 2018): http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2014/12/141202_hawking_yapay_zeka
16. Cellan-Jones, R., 2017. The robot lawyers are here - and they’re winning. BBC News Technology – Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41829534
17. Clarke, R., 1993. Asimov's Laws of Robotics: Implications for Information Technology-Part I. Computer, 26(12), 53-61.
18. Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Borg, J. S., Deng, Y., Kramer, M., 2017. Moral Decision Making Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence. In AAAI (pp. 4831-4835).
19. Copeland, J., 1993. Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction, Blackwell: Oxford.
20. Dashevsky, E., 2017. Do Robots and AI Deserve Rights?. Enterpreneur – News and Trends – AI. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 31 Ocak 2018): https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/289344
21. Davis, D., 2018. How AI and copyright would work. TechCrunch. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 31 Ocak 2018): https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/09/how-ai-and-copyright-would-work/
22. Dewey, D., 2014. Reinforcement Learning and the Reward Engineering Principle. In 2014 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
23. Dorigo, M., de Oca, M.A.M., Engelbrecht, A., 2008. Particle Swarm Optimization. Scholarpedia, 3(11), 1486.
24. Dormehl, L., 2017. I, Alexa: Should we give artificial intelligence human rights?. DigitalTrends – Computing. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 31 Ocak 2018): https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/ai-personhood-ethics-questions/
25. Evans, O., Goodman, N.D., 2015. Learning the Preferences of Bounded Agents. In NIPS Workshop on Bounded Optimality.
26. Evans, O., Stuhlmüller, A., Goodman, N.D., 2016. Learning the Preferences of Ignorant, Inconsistent Agents. In AAAI (pp. 323-329).
27. Ferber, J., 1999. Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
28. Galeon, D., Houser, K., 2017. Google’s Artificial Intelligence Built an AI That Outperforms Any Made by Humans, Futurism. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 4 Şubat 2018): https://futurism.com/google-artificial-intelligence-built-ai/
29. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., 2016. Deep Learning (Vol. 1). MIT Press.
30. Goodfellow, I., Papernot, N., Huang, S., Duan, Y., Abbeel, P., Clark, J., 2017. Attacking Machine Learning with Adversarial Examples, Open AI – Blog Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim 5 Şubat 2018): https://blog.openai.com/adversarial-example-research/
31. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., 2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.
32. Hady, M.F.A., Schwenker, F., 2013. Semi-supervised Learning. In Handbook on Neural Information Processing (pp. 215-239). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
33. Heath, N., 2015. Why AI could destroy more jobs than it creates, and how to save them. TechRepublic.com. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): https://www.techrepublic.com/article/ai-is-destroying-more-jobs-than-it-creates-what-it-means-and-how-we-can-stop-it/
34. Holland, O. (Ed.)., 2003. Machine Consciousness. Imprint Academic.
35. John Walker, S., 2014. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think, International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 181-183.
36. Karaboğa, D., 2014. Yapay Zeka Optimizasyon Algoritmaları. Nobel Yayıncılık.
37. Kober, J., Peters, J., 2012. Reinforcement Learning in Robotics: A Survey. In Reinforcement Learning (pp. 579-610). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
38. Kose, U., Pavaloiu, A., 2017. Dealing with Machine Ethics in Daily Life: A View with Examples. The 5th International Virtual Conference on Advanced Scientific Results. Slovakia, pp. 200-205. 10.18638/scieconf.2017.5.1.454.
39. Kotsiantis, S.B., 2007. Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques. Informatica, 31, 249-268.
40. Kulaklı, G., 2017. Yüzyılın Kavgası: Mark Zuckerberg İle Elon Musk Birbirine Girdi!. WebTekno. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 3 Şubat 2018): http://www.webtekno.com/yuzyilin-kavgasi-mark-zuckerberg-ile-elon-musk-birbirine-girdi-h31650.html
41. Kurzweil, R., 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin.
42. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., 2015. Deep Learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436.
43. Maes, P. (Ed.)., 1990. Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice From Biology to Engineering and Back. MIT Press.
44. Massachusetts Teknoloji Enstitüsü, 2018. Moral Machine. Moral Machine Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 7 Şubat 2018): http://moralmachine.mit.edu/
45. Metz, C., 2017. Building A.I. That Can Build A.I., The New York Times. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 4 Şubat 2018): https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/05/technology/machine-learning-artificial-intelligence-ai.html
46. Minsky, M., 2007. The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. Simon and Schuster.
47. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., Riedmiller, M., 2013. Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602.
48. Moor, J., 2009. Four Kinds of Ethical Robots. Philosophy Now, 72, 12-14.
49. Muehlhauser, L., Helm, L., 2012. The Singularity and Machine Ethics. In Singularity Hypotheses (pp. 101-126). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
50. Murphy, R., Woods, D.D., 2009. Beyond Asimov: The Three Laws of Responsible Robotics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(4).
51. Nabiyev, V.V., 2005. Yapay Zeka: Problemler-Yöntemler-Algoritmalar. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
52. Ng, A.Y., Russell, S.J., 2000. Algorithms for Inverse Reinforcement Learning. In ICML (pp. 663-670).
53. Norman, A., 2018. Your Future Doctor May Not be Human. This Is the Rise of AI in Medicine.. Futurism – SciFi Visions. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): https://futurism.com/ai-medicine-doctor/
54. Orseau, L., Armstrong, S., 2016. Safely Interruptible Agents. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: 32nd Conference (UAI 2016), (Eds.) Alexander Ihler and Dominik Janzing, (pp. 557-566).
55. Pavaloiu, A., Kose, U., 2017. Ethical Artificial Intelligence-An Open Question. Journal of Multidisciplinary Developments, 2(2), 15-27.
56. Riedl, M.O., Harrison, B., 2016. Using Stories to Teach Human Values to Artificial Agents. In AAAI Workshop: AI, Ethics, and Society.
57. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., Canny, J.F., Malik, J.M., Edwards, D.D., 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Vol. 2, No. 9). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
58. Russell, S., Dewey, D., Tegmark, M., 2015. Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence. Ai Magazine, 36(4), 105-114.
59. Schneider, S., 2016. Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence. John Wiley & Sons.
60. Shead, S., 2016. Google has developed a 'big red button' that can be used to interrupt artificial intelligence and stop it from causing harm, Business Insider UK. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 5 Şubat 2018): http://uk.businessinsider.com/google-deepmind-develops-a-big-red-button-to-stop-dangerous-ais-causing-harm-2016-6
61. Silva, T.C., Zhao, L., 2016. Network-Based Unsupervised Learning. In Machine Learning in Complex Networks (pp. 143-180). Springer International Publishing.
62. Singh, S., 2018. Will Artificial Intelligence take over jobs?. The Economic Times (India Times) – Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/will-artificial-intelligence-take-over-jobs/articleshow/62610145.cms
63. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G., 1998. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (Vol. 1, No. 1). MIT Press.
64. The Associated Press, 2017. For Driverless Cars, a Moral Dilemma: Who Lives and Who Dies?, NBC News Web. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 7 Şubat 2018): http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/driverless-carsmoral-dilemma-who-lives-who-dies-n708276
65. The Week, 2018. Amazon Go: AI-powered supermarket opens. The Week – Artificial Intelligence. Çevrimiçi (Erişim, 1 Şubat 2018): http://www.theweek.co.uk/artificial-intelligence/91111/amazon-go-ai-powered-supermarket-opens
66. Vamplew, P., Dazeley, R., Foale, C., Firmin, S., Mummery, J., 2017. Human-Aligned Artificial Intelligence is a Multiobjective Problem. Ethics and Information Technology, 1-14.
67. Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.Q., Ding, W., 2014. Data Mining with Big Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26(1), 97-107.Yampolskiy, R.V., 2013. Artificial Intelligence Safety Engineering: Why Machine Ethics is a Wrong Approach. In Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence (pp. 389-396). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
68. Yampolskiy, R.V., 2015. Artificial Superintelligence: A Futuristic Approach. CRC Press.
69. Xia, F., Yang, L.T., Wang, L., Vinel, A., 2012. Internet of Things. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(9), 1101.