E-Learning Framework Design for Medical Education Based on Requirement Analysis

Abstract

This study proposes an e-learning framework for Turkish Family Medicine (FM) physicians by requirement analysis using e-learning survey and program educators’ interview. The main data collection was done with an online survey complemented by a structured interview. According to the outcomes of e-learning survey, the Khan framework was modified with Mobile/Wireless Technologies, Time, Content Control, Delivery Method dimensions. The program educators declared that their opinions for potential solutions as getting training for e-learning; increasing human resources capacity for support; implementing training in asynchronous format; accepting online learning  culture; eliminating hardware, software and connection problems; increasing financial support; getting managerial implementation support and improving personal rights. 

Keywords

• E-learning framework,e-learning dimension,medical education,educator interview

References

1. Akdağ, R.(2016). The Family Medicine Model of Turkey, Retrieved from http://ailehekimligi.gov.tr/component/content/article/101-english/532-the-family-medicine-model-of-turkey.htmlAkhondi, A., Yarmohammadian, M., H. & Haghani, F. (2015). Designing an e-learning curriculum for spelling on the basis of cognitive approach. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 5(1), 08-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v5i1.9 Baskan, G., A. & Atalar, E. (2014). Primary education teacher training policies of South Korea and Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 1(1), 39-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v0i0.121 Bielefeldt, T. (2006). Teaching, Learning, and One-to-One Computing. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference , USA, San Diego, July 6, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.fouriersys.com/nova_download_center/talbot_bielefeldt.pdf
2. Bradley, L. (2015). The Mobile Language Learner-Use of Technology in Language Learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(10), 1269-1282.
3. Chan, S.C.H. & Ngai, E.W.T. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted Web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 289-315.
4. Erol, C., C. (2015). New approaches in art education: Moodle learning and content management system based art education. Global Journal of Arts Education, 5(2), 67-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/gjae.v5i2.248
5. Idrus, R. M. (2008). Transforming Engineering Learning via Technogogy. Paper presented at the 5th WSEAS / IASME International Conference on ENGINEERING EDUCATION (EE'08).
6. Khader, Y. S., Batayaha, W. & Al-Omari, M. (2011).The effect of evidence-based medicine (EBM) training seminars on the knowledge and attitudes of medical students towards EBM, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 17(No. 4): 640-643.
7. Khan, H. B., (2011) A framework for Web-based learning, In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
8. Khan, B. H. (2009). E-Learning - The Global e-Learning Framework. In S. Mishra (Ed.), STRIDE Handbook 8 (Vol. 1, pp. 42-52). New Delhi–110 068 ,MaidanGarhi: The Indira Gandhi National Open University-

9. Kituyi, Gç, & Tusubira, I. (2013). A framework for the integration of e-learning in higher education institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2013, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 19-36
10. Kocakoyun, S. & Bicen, H. (2017). Development and evaluation of educational android application. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(2), 58-68. Retrieved from http://sproc.org/ojs/index.php/cjes/article/view/1938
11. Newton, D. and Ellis, A. 2006. “A model for e-learning integration”. Proceedings of E-Learn 2006: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate Government, Healthcare and Higher Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Honolulu,Hawaii.
12. Nichols, M. (2007). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.blackwellsynergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00761.x
13. Ozdamli, F. (2013). Effectiveness of cloud systems and social networks in improving self-directed learning abilities and developing positive seamless learning perceptions. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 602-618.
14. Rozano, M. & Romero, J. (2016). Skill acquisition in blended learning courses: influence on student performance. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 30-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i1.372
15. Salimi, E., Shojaei, A., & Raissi, S. (2015). Delibration on service quality evaluation of internet banking by using ES-Qual, a Case study in an Iranian Bank. Global Journal of Computer Sciences, 5(1), 51-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/gjcs.v5i1.33
16. Schichtel, M. (2010). Core-competence skills in e-mentoring for medical educators: a conceptual exploration, Medical Teacher Vol. 32: e248-e262.
17. Sharma, R.C. & Mishra, S. (2007). Cases in Global E-Learning Practices: Successes and Pitfalls. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Inc.
18. Tiyar, F., R. & Khoshsima, H. (2015). Understanding students’ satisfaction and continuance intention of elearning: Application of expectation–confirmation model. World Journal on Educational Technology, 7(3), 157-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i3.203
19. Tong, Y., & Bakan, M. (2016). A mobile visualization platform for exploring social media data. Global Journal of Information Technology, 6(1), 27-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/gjit.v6i1.386
20. Uzunboylu, H., & Tugun, V. (2016). Validity and Reliability of Tablet Supported Education Attitude and Usability Scale. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(1), 82-93.
21. Vrabie, C. (2016). E-Learning for all. A cross border project for strengthening the overall capacities of the CSOs. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences [Online], 8, 25-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v2i7.1176