Publication ethics

· Publishers and editors take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research ethic misconduct has occurred.
· In no case a publisher or editors encourage ethics misconduct, or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.
· In the event that a journal’s publisher or editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct the publisher or editor deal with allegations appropriately.
· The journal have guidelines for retracting or correcting articles when needed.
· Publishers and editors can be publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.
· The author(s) warrant that the manuscript submitted is his/her/their own original research.
· All participated authors in this work take public responsibility and have approved that the manuscript has not been sent any other journal for publication.
· Review process cannot begin in case of failure or missing any of the requirements mentioned in this journal.
· The submitter must provide and maintain all requirements during the evaluation process.
· It should be made sure that other individuals shown as co-authors have contributed to the research. It is contrary to the scientific ethics to add some, who are not academic contributors to the article, as co-authors or to put in order co-authors with non-academic criteria such as title, age, and gender regardless of the order of contribution.
· It is assumed that authors who submit articles to the journal read and accept the publishing and writing principles of the journal and the writers are deemed to have committed themselves to these principles.
· Citations and bibliography should be complete and realistic.
· Author commits all conditions by sending the manuscript.
· All matter included in the manuscript does not violate any existing copyright rules and any intellectual property rights of any person or entity.
· The manuscript meets ethical standards applicable to the research discipline.
· All peer review publications will be refereed in double-blind review process by at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area. Book, Software and Website Reviews will not be reviewed, but the editors reserve the right to refuse or edit review.
· Authors and editors should take into account the criteria of Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive specified by the Higher Education Council, the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Plagiarism Policy
· During review process we use iThenticate plagiarism software. The authors should scan with iThenticate plagiarism or other plagiarism software of their manuscripts before submitting.
· About plagiarism, we act based on flow charts and workflows determined in COPE.

Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Yayın Eğiti

- Yayıncılar ve editörler, araştırma etiği suistimalinin meydana geldiği makalelerin yayınlanmasını tespit etmek ve önlemek için makul adımlar atar.
- Hiçbir durumda bir yayıncı veya editörler etik suistimalleri teşvik etmez veya bilerek bu tür suistimallerin gerçekleşmesine izin vermez.
- Bir derginin yayıncısı veya editörlerinin, herhangi bir araştırma görevi kötüye kullanma iddiasından haberdar edilmesi durumunda, yayıncı veya editör, iddiaları uygun şekilde ele alır.
- Dergi, gerektiğinde makaleleri geri çekmek veya düzeltmek için yönergelere sahiptir.
- Yayıncılar ve editörler gerektiğinde düzeltmeler, açıklamalar, geri çekmeler ve özürler yayınlayabilir