Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 71 - 80, 15.12.2015

Bengi Birgili

Abstract

Creative and critical thinking skills are the abilities, which can sometimes be
used interchangeably in definition. In fact, they have different constructs
because they differentiate in outcome of human behaviours. Also one of today’s
requirements is that individuals should approach everyday problems by using
both competences. So, one of the helpful tool for development of creativity and
critical thinking skills proposed is problem-based learning environments in
classrooms. In this study, problem based approach including philosophy;
general characteristics of it, role of teachers and students in problem-based
learning environment, and its uniqueness over other learning approaches is
explained by considering advantages and limitations. Then, problem-based
learning is discussed with regard to instructional design perspective in a
scientific manner. Finally, the study is aimed to explain when PBL grounded in
development of instructional strategy as a fruitful approach; instructional
strategies, methods and techniques are differentiated in creativity and critical
thinking skills. 

Keywords

problem-based learning, creative thinking, critical thinking, instructional design

Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments

Abstract

Creative and critical thinking skills are the abilities, which can sometimes be used interchangeably in definition. In fact, they have different constructs because they differentiate in outcome of human behaviours. Also one of today’s requirements is that individuals should approach everyday problems by using both competences. So, one of the helpful tool for development of creativity and critical thinking skills proposed is problem-based learning environments in classrooms. In this study, problem based approach including philosophy; general characteristics of it, role of teachers and students in problem-based learning environment, and its uniqueness over other learning approaches is explained by considering advantages and limitations. Then, problem-based learning is discussed with regard to instructional design perspective in a scientific manner. Finally, the study is aimed to explain when PBL grounded in development of instructional strategy as a fruitful approach; instructional strategies, methods and techniques are differentiated in creativity and critical thinking skills.

Keywords

problem-based learning, creative thinking, critical thinking, instructional design

References

• Albanese, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
• Arslan, M. (2007). Ögretim ilke ve yöntemleri. Anı Publishing, Ankara.
• Augustine, N. R. (2011). Educating the gifted. Psychological Science in The Public Interest,12(1), 1-2
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1998). Problem-based learning: An approach tomedical education. New York: Springer.
• Batdı, V. (2014). The effects of a problem-based learning approach on students’attitude levels: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(9), 272-276. Bruner, J.S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
• Choi, E., Lindquist, R., & Song, Y. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning vs.traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 52-56. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012
• Demirel, Ö. (2012). Egitimde Program Gelistirme: Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications.
• Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thoughts. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
• Gilhooly, K. J., Ball, L. J., & Macchi, L. (2015) Insight and creative thinking processes: Routine and special. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2014.966758
• Glass, T. (2004). What gift? The reality of the student who is gifted and talented in public school classrooms. Gifted Child Today, 2(4), 25-29.
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem based learning: What and how do students learn. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
• Howard, L. W., Tang, T., & Austin, M. J. (2015). Teaching critical thinking skills: Ability, motivation, intervention, and the Pygmalion effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 133-147.
• Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessingstudents’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in qualityassurance. Learning Environments Research, 12, 15–29.
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. New York: Pearson Education.
• Lawless, K. A. & Brown, S. W. (2015). Developing scientific literacy skills throughinterdisciplinary, technology based global simulations: GlobalEd 2. The CurriculumJournal, 26(2), 268-289.
• Liu, Z. K., He, J., & Li, B. (2015). Critical and creative thinking as learning processes attop-ranking Chinese middle schools: possibilities and required improvements. HighAbility Studies, 26(1), 139-152. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2015.1015501
• Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: AspenNewbill, P. & Baum, L. (2012). Design creativity, Learning and Leading withTechnology. ISTE- International Society for Technology in Education.
• Olszewski-Kubilius & Thomson, (2015).Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upple Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.
• Pijl-Zieber, E. M. (2006). History, philosophy and criticisms of problem based learning in adult education. University of Calgary. 1-13.
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310. Runco, M. A: (2014). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development and practice. (2nd ed.)USA: Elsevier Inc.
• Robson, S. (2013). The analysing children's creative thinking framework: Developmentof an observation-led approach to identifying and analysing young children'screative thinking. British Educational Research Journal. doi: 10.1002/berj.3033
• Samli, A. C. (2011). From imagination to innovation: New product development for quality of life.New York: Springer
• Seferoglu, S. S. & Akbıyık, C. (2006). Teaching critical thinking. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 193-200.
• Segal, J. W., Chipman, S.F., & Galser, R. (1985). Thinking and learning skills: relating instruction to research. New York: Routledge.Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Academic intelligence is not enough WICS: An expended model for effective practice in school and later in life. Retrieved from: https://www.clarku.edu/research/mosakowskiinstitute/conferences/mar12/papers /Sternberg.pdf
• Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-20.
• Thurman, A. B. (2009). Teaching of critical thinking skills in the English content area in South Dakota public high schools and college. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of South Dakota, USA.
• Tortop, H. S. (2013). A new model program for academically gifted students in Turkey: Overview of the education program for the gifted students’ bridge with university. Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 2(1), 21-31.
• Tortop, H.S., & Ozek, N. (2013). The meaningful field trip in project based learning; the solar energy and its usage areas topic. H. U. Journal of Education, 44, 300-307.
• Ulger, K. & Imer, Z. (2013). The effect of problem based learning approach on students’ creative thinking ability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(1), 382- 392.
• Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson–Glaser critical thinking appraisal manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Young, M. H. & Balli, S. J. (2014). Gifted and talented education: student and parent perspectives. Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 236-246. doi:10.1177/10762175145.