Analysis of Reports on the Occupational Health and Safety in The Agricultural Industry: A bibliometrix-Aided Approach

Abstract

Agricultural activities are fundamental to societies, including the planting, growing, harvesting and processing of agricultural crops. However, there are a large number of occupational risks that can arise during the course of agricultural activities. These risks could result in serious injury or even death. This requires introducing and providing the relevant bodies and workers with knowledge, perception and awareness of the risk. The present study assessed the available reports on occupational health and safety using a bibliometric analysis and dimension reduction approach. Briefly, the reports were extracted from SCOPUS database. We identified 943 relevant and available peer-reviewed publications from the Scopus database. These were published between 1956 and 2022. The retrieved documents were analysed with the R-studio based software Bibliometrix. For the analysis, co-occurrences of networks, thematic maps and trending topics were analyzed. The results of the present study show that the time span of the documents ranges from 1956 to 2022 and these documents, including journals, books, book chapters and conference papers, were disseminated in 313 different sources. The estimated annual growth rate of these documents is 6.35%. Even the first paper dates back to the 1950s, the average age of the documents are 10.7. Considering the spatial distribution of the documents, USA topped at the list and was followed by Australia, Brazil, Italy, Canada, UK, and China. It is interesting to note that 'confined spaces' were found to be the trending topic according to the trend topic analysis of the keywords. Also, after the basic keywords (occupational health and safety and agriculture) of the study, ergonomics was the core keyword of the relevant analysis. Critically, the level of co-operation between countries was very low, with a rate of 0.025-0.207 for co-operation between countries (MCPs). For Turkey, the MCP was found to be 0.000. According to the thematic map, the motor theme is composed of two major clusters. One relates to food safety, risk analysis, knowledge and awareness and hygiene. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to identify the key issues in occupational health and safety in the agricultural industry. Therefore, the study has potential to contribute to the field.

Keywords

• Bibliometrics
• Occupational Risk
• Thematic map
• Co-occurrence networks

References

1. Asher, M. (2009). Extending social security coverage in Asia-Pacific: A review of good practices and lessons learnt. International social security association working paper No, 6.
2. Bahşi, N., & Kendi, O. (2019). Farmers’ approaches on occupational health and safety: the case of city of Osmaniye and Konya, Turkey. Ciência Rural, 49.
3. Bakırcı, N. (2011). Tarımda Çalışanların Sağlığı ve Güvenliği. TTB Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi, 11(39), 7-13.
4. Cavalli, L. S., Marques, F. B., & Watterson, A. (2020). A critical overview of work‐related injury and illness in aquaculture workers from Brazil. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(2), 1157-1164.
5. Choudhri, A. F., Siddiqui, A., Khan, N. R., & Cohen, H. L. (2015). Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics, 35(3), 736-746.
6. Davis, K. G., & Kotowski, S. E. (2007). Understanding the ergonomic risk for musculoskeletal disorders in the United States agricultural sector. American journal of industrial medicine, 50(7), 501-511.
7. Devos, P., & Menard, J. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of research relating to hypertension reported over the period 1997–2016. Journal of hypertension, 37(11), 2116.
8. Di Cosmo, A., Pinelli, C., Scandurra, A., Aria, M., & D’Aniello, B. (2021). Research trends in octopus biological studies. Animals, 11(6), 1808.

9. Durczak, K., & Jurek, P. (2017). Safety and ergonomics as important criteria of quality of agricultural machinery. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 62(2), 27-31.
10. Forget, G. (1993). Balancing the need for pesticides with the risk to human health. In Impact of pesticide use on health in developing countries: proceedings of a symposium held in Ottawa, Canada, 17-20 Sept. 1990. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA.
11. Güğercin, Ö., & Baytorun, A. N. (2018). Tarımda İş Kazaları ve Gerekli Önlemler. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 33(2), 157-168.
12. Gümüş, S., Okan, S. Ü., & Hatay, T. Y. (2020). Analysis of work accidents in wood harvesting: a case study of the East Black Sea region. Forestist, 70(1), 1-7.
13. ILO (International Labour Organization) (2021): [https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer31/; Access date: July 14, 2023)
14. İnanç, S., & Ağyürek, C. (2019). Effects of occupational health and safety law on forestry employees.
15. Kanvermez, Ç., & Sümer, S. K. (2021). Türkiye’de Tarım Sektöründe Çalışanların İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliğinin Kanun ve İş Hukuku Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 76(2), 575-596.
16. Karanatsiou, D., Li, Y., Arvanitou, E. M., Misirlis, N., & Wong, W. E. (2019). A bibliometric assessment of software engineering scholars and institutions (2010–2017). Journal of Systems and Software, 147, 246-261.
17. Kulak, M., & Kılıç, N. (2020, May). A bibliometric analysis: How important is salicylic in response to the salinity from NaCl?. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (p. 1302).
18. Kulak, M., Ozkan, A., & Bindak, R. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the essential oil-bearing plants exposed to the water stress: How long way we have come and how much further?. Scientia horticulturae, 246, 418-436.
19. Lin, M., Chen, Y., & Chen, R. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on Pythagorean fuzzy sets during 2013–2020. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 14(2), 104-121.
20. Luo, J., Han, H., Jia, F., & Dong, H. (2020). Agricultural Co-operatives in the western world: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122945.
21. Ma, D., Yang, B., Guan, B., Song, L., Liu, Q., Fan, Y., ... & Xu, H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of pyroptosis from 2001 to 2021. Frontiers in immunology, 12, 731933.
22. Malanski, P. D., Schiavi, S., & Dedieu, B. (2019). Characteristics of “work in agriculture” scientific communities. A bibliometric review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39, 1-16.
23. Markscheffel, B., & Schröter, F. (2021). Comparison of two science mapping tools based on software technical evaluation and bibliometric case studies. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 15(2), 365-396.
24. McLaughlin, J., Hennebry, J., & Haines, T. (2014). Paper versus practice: occupational health and safety protections and realities for temporary foreign agricultural workers in Ontario. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (16-2).
25. Okyay, R. A., Tanır, F., & Ağaoğlu, P. M. (2018). Occupational health and safety characteristics of agricultural workers in Adana, Turkey: a cross-sectional study. PeerJ, 6, e4952.
26. Ou, Z., Qiu, L., Rong, H., Li, B., Ren, S., Kuang, S., ... & Li, J. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapy in cancers from 2001 to 2021. Frontiers in Immunology, 1333.
27. Ovchinnikova, E., Shkrabak, R., & Shkrabak, V. (2016). Current status and prospective aspects of labor safety in agriculture. Verun Deutsheringenieure Universitet Hohenheim lnstitute fur Agrartechnik.-Heft4. 01-02 Marz, 171.
28. Özbakır, O. & Bakkıran, H. (2023). Iğdır ilinde pandemi döneminde çalışan kadınların çalışma hayatında karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Doğal ve Beşeri Bilimler Açısından IĞDIR-II,173-196.
29. Özkan, A., Dilay, Y., & Mehmetbey, K. (2019). Tarım Kesiminde Meydana Gelen Bazı Kazaların İş Güvenliği Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. CİLT 3, 40.
30. Pawlak, K., Smutka, L., & Kotyza, P. (2021). Agricultural potential of the EU countries: how far are they from the USA?. Agriculture, 11(4), 282.
31. Pyykkönen, M., & Aherin, B. (2012). 53 Occupational Health and Safety in Agriculture.
32. Rejeb, A., Abdollahi, A., Rejeb, K., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107017.
33. Report of foreign economic relations board of Turkey, Deik, (2014).
34. Riccò, M., Vezzosi, L., & Gualerzi, G. (2018). Health and safety of pesticide applicators in a high income agricultural setting: a knowledge, attitude, practice, and toxicity study from North-Eastern Italy. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 59(3), E200.
35. Riedel, S. M., & Field, W. E. (2013). Summation of the frequency, severity, and primary causative factors associated with injuries and fatalities involving confined spaces in agriculture. Journal of agricultural safety and health, 19(2), 83-100.
36. Şen, G., & Güngör, E. (2019). Local Perceptions of Forest Certification in State-Based Forest Enterprises. Small-scale Forestry, 18(1), 1-19.
37. Vetrivel, V., & Manigandan, R. (2013). An empirical study of agricultural labour in India. Journal of exclusive management science, 2(12), 1-6.
38. Yalçın, G. E., Yazıcı, E., Kara, F. Ö., İpekçioğlu, Ş., & Yalçın, M. (2016) Tarımda iş kazaları ve hastalıkları.
39. Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., Duan, Z. Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2016, 67(4), 967–972.