Güneydoğu Anadolu’da Bazı Tritikale Genotiplerinin Verim ve Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu araştırma bazı tritikale genotiplerinin farklı lokasyonlarda verim ve verim unsurlarını belirlemek için yürütülmüştür. Tarla Denemeleri, 2012-13 üretim sezonunda Diyarbakır ve Mardin ve ekolojik koşullarında tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre dört tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Materyal olarak 3 ticari tritikale çeşidi (Ege Yıldızı, Fahad-5 and Karma 2000) ve iki ileri tritikale hattı (Hat DZT-01 ve Hat DZT-06) kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada SPAD, protein içeriği, hektolitre ağırlığı, bin tane ağırlığı, nişasta içeriği, yaş glüten, zeleny sedimantasyon ve tane verimi özellikleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, SPAD 51.8-57.3, tane verimi 5043.9-6469.3 kg ha^-1, bin tane ağırlığı 35.31-45.81 g, hektolitre ağırlığı 71.38-78.72 kg hL^-1, protein içeriği %13.1-13.7, nişasta içeriği %64.27-65.94, glüten içeriği %28.71-30.6 ve zeleny sedimantasyon 40.42-45.67mL değerleri arasında değişim göstermiştir. Her iki lokasyonda da protein içeriği ile yaş glüten ve zeleny sedimantasyon özellikleri arasında olumlu ve önemli ilişki belirlenmiştir. İleri tritikale hatları tane verimi ve kalite özellikleri yönünden ticari çeşitlere göre her iki lokasyonda da üstün bulunmuşlardır. Bu nedenle Hat DZT-01 ve Hat DZT-06 yeni çeşit adayı ve Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesinde ekimi tavsiye edilebilir genotipler olarak belirlenmişlerdir.

Keywords

• Tritikale,protein içeriği,tane verimi,SPAD

Assessment of Yield and Quality of Some Triticale Genotypes in South-Eastern Anatolia

Abstract

This research was conducted to assess of yield and its component in different locations some triticale genotypes. The field experiment was arranged to the randomized complete block design with four replications during the 2012-13 growing seasons under Diyarbakir and Mardin ecological conditions. Three triticale cultivars (Ege Yildizi, Fahad-5 and Karma 2000) and two advanced lines (Line DZT-01 and Line DZT-06) were used as material. SPAD, protein content, test weight, thousand kernel weight, starch content, wet gluten, zeleny sedimentation and grain yield were evaluated. According to the findings of research, genotypic differences were found significant for SPAD, grain yield, thousand kernel weight and test weight. The values ranged in genotypes were between 51.8-57.3 in SPAD, 5043.9-6469.3 kg ha^-1 in grain yield, 35.31-45.81 g in thousand kernel weight, 71.38-78.72 kg hL^-1 intest weight, 13.1-13.7% in protein content, 64.27-65.94% in starch content, 28.71-30.61% in wet gluten and 40.42-45.67 mL in zeleny sedimentation. Significant positive correlation between protein content with gluten content and zeleny sedimentation in both locations was found. With regard to grain yield and some quality traits of Line DZT-01 and quality traits of Line DZT-06 were highest than commercial cultivars in both locations. Line DZT-01 and Line DZT-06 were found as promising line. These lines can be new cultivar candidates and could be recommended to sown in South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.

Keywords

• Triticale,grain yield,protein content,SPAD

References

1. Atli A, 1999. Wheat and quality of its product. Symposium on the Problems and Solutions of Grain Crop in Central Anatolia, Konya, June 8-11, 1999, pp:498-506.
2. Barutcular C, Yildirim M, Koc M, Dizlek H, Akinci C, EL Sabagh A, Saneoka H, Ueda A, Islam MS, Toptas I,Albayrak O, Tanrikulu A, 2016. Quality traits performance of bread wheat genotypes under drought and heat stress conditions. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 25(10):1-7.
3. FAO, 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC, (Accessed: 16 June 2016).
4. Furan MA, Demir I, Yuce S, Can RA, Aykut F, 2005. Research on Aegean Region Triticale Variety Development Studies and Relationships among Yield and Quality Components in the Developed Variety and Lines. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 18(2):251-256.
5. Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M, 2002. SPAD Readings and Associated Leaf Traits in Durum Wheat, Barley and Triticale Cultivars. Euphytica, 125(2):197-205.
6. Kizilgeci F, Yildirim M, 2017a. Determination of Yield and Quality Components of Some Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) Genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(1):43-49.
7. Kizilgeci F, Akinci C, Albayrak O, Yildirim M, 2017b. Relationships of Grain Yield and Some Quality Parameters with Physiological Parameters in Some Triticale Advanced Lines. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute Science and Technology, 7(1): 337-345.
8. Kendal E, Sayar MS, 2016. The Stability of Some Spring Triticale Genotypes Using Biplot Analysis. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 26(3):754-765

9. Klassen AJ, Hill RD, Larter EN, 1971. Alpha-amylase Activity and Carbohydrate Content as Related to Kernel Development in Triticale 1. Crop science, 11(2):265-267.
10. Kučerová J, 2007. The Effect of Year, Site and Variety on The Quality Characteristics and Bioethanol Yield of Winter Triticale. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 113(2):142-146.
11. Meyer R, Lorenzo del Rio AJ, 2004. Triticale As Animal Feed, Triticale Improvement and Production, 49-57.
12. Mut Z, Albayrak S, Tongel O, 2006. Determination of Grain Yield and Some Traits of Triticale (Xtriticosecale Wittmack) Lines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1): 56-64.
13. Oral E, Ulker M, 2016. Path Analysis and Relations Between Features in Triticale (X Triticosecale Witmack) Varieties. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute Science and Technology, 6(3): 153-160.