Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 862 - 869, 01.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.439033

Abstract

Bu çalışmada keçiboynuzu unu ve galeta unundan farklı oranlarda hazırlanan karışımların %5 seviyesinde tavuk köftelere ilavelerinin bazı özellikler üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Kızartılmamış örneklerde renk değerleri belirlenirken, 175 oC’de 5 d kızartılan köftelerde verim, çap azalması, renk değerleri, nem tutma oranları, yağ emme oranları ve duyusal özellikler saptanmıştır. Çalışma sonunda keçiboynuzu ununun kızartılmamış örneklerde kırmızılık (a) değerini artırdığı gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca kızartılan örneklerde verim ve nem tutma oranlarını artırmış, duyusal değerlerde ise düşük oranlarda kullanımlarında alternatif bir malzeme olabileceğini göstermiştir. Bütün sonuçlara bağlı olarak, tavuk köftelere 1:2 ve 2:1 oranlarında keçiboynuzu unu:galeta unu karışımlarının tavsiye edilebileceği anlaşılmıştır.

Thanks

Bu çalışmanın yürütülmesi için maddi destek sağlayan Adıyaman Banvit Şirketi’ne teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Anonim, 2002. Offical Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  • Bilek AE, Turhan S, 2009. Enhancement of the Nutritional Status of Beef Patties by Adding Flaxeed Flour. Meat Sciences, 82(4): 472-477.
  • Cava R, Ladero-Cantero L, Ramirez VR, 2012. Assessment of Different Dietary Fibers (tomato fiber, beet root fiber, and inulin) for the Manufacture of Chopped Cooked Chicken Products, Journal of Food Sciences, 77(4): 346-352.
  • Demirci ZO, Yılmaz I, Demirci AŞ, 2014. Effects of Xanthan, Guar, Carrageenan, and Locust Bean Gum Addition on Physical, Chemical, and Sensory Properties of Meatballs, Journal of Food Sciences and Technology, 51(1): 936-942.
  • Dogan S, Sahin S, Sumnu G, 2005. Effects of Soy and Rice Flour Addition on Batter Rheology and Quality of Deep-fat Fried Chicken Nuggets. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(1): 127-132.
  • Egbert RW, Huffman DL, Chen C, Dylewski P. 1991. Development of Low-fat Ground Beef. Food Technology, 45(6): 64-73.
  • Giese J, 1992. Developing Low-fat Meat Products. Food Technology, 46(4): 100-108.
  • Gökalp HY, Kaya M, Tülek Y, Zorba O, 1999. Et ve Ürünlerinde Kalite Kontrolü ve Laboratuvar Uygulama Klavuzu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Yay No: 318, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Ikhlas B, Huda N, Noryati I, 2011. Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Meatballs Prepared from Mechanically Deboned Quail Meat Using Various Types of Flour. International journal of Poultry Science, 10(1): 30-37.
  • Karkacıer M, Artık N, 1995. Keçiboynuzunun (Ceratonia siliqua) Fiziksel Özellikleri, Kimyasal Bileşimi ve Ekstraksiyon Koşulları. Gıda, 20(3): 131-136.
  • Kılınççeker O, 2015. Some Quality Caharacteristics of Fish Meatballs Manufactured with Different Vegetable-based Flours. Gıda, 4(2): 61-67.
  • Kılınççeker O, 2017. Tara, Tragakant ve Agar Agar Gamlarının Tavuk Köftelerde Kullanımı. Gıda, 42(3): 219-228.
  • Kılınççeker O, Hepsağ F, Kurt S, 2015. The Effects of Lentil and Chickpea Flours as the Breading Materials on Some Properties of Chicken Meatballs During Frozen Storage. Journal of Food Sciences and Technology, 52(1): 580-585.
  • Kılınççeker O, Yılmaz MT, 2016. Farklı bitkisel liflerin çiğ ve kızartılmış tavuk köftelerdeki bazı kalite özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Türkiye 12. Gıda Kongresi, 5-7 Ekim 2016, Edirne.
  • Kurt Ş, Kılınççeker O, 2012. The Effects of Cereal and Legume Flours on the Quality Characteristics of Beef Patties. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(5): 725-730.
  • Pazır F, Alper Y, 2016. Keçiboynuzu Meyvesi (Ceratonia siliqua L.) ve Sağlık. Akademik Gıda, 14(3): 302-306.
  • Pinero MP, Parra K, Huerta-Leidenz N, Moreno LA, Ferrer M, Araujo S, Barboza Y 2008. Effect of Oat’s Soluble (β-glucan) as a Fat Replacer on Physical, Chemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Low-fat Beef Patties. Meat Science, 80(3): 675–680.
  • Santhi D, Kalaikannan A, 2014. The Effect of Addition of Oat Flour in Low-fat Chicken Nuggets. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 4(1): 1-4.
  • Serdaroğlu M, Değirmencioğlu Ö, 2004. Effects of Fat Level (5%, 10%, 20%) and Corn Flour (0%, 2%, 4%) on Some Properties of Turkish Type Meatballs (koefte). Meat Sciences, 68(2): 291-296.
  • Soltanizadeh N, Ghiasi-Esfahani H, 2015. Qualitative Improvement of Low Meat Beef Burger Using Aloe vera. Meat Science, 99(1): 75-80.
  • Soyer A, Kolsarıcı N, Candoğan K, 1999. Tavuk Etlerinin Baz Kalite Özellikleri ve Besin Ögelerine Geleneksel ve Mikrodalga ile Pişirme Yöntemlerinin Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(2): 289-296.
  • Talukder S, Sharma DP, 2010. Development of Dietary Fiber Rich Chicken Meat patties Using Wheat and Oat Bran, Journal of Food Science and Technology - Mysore, 47(2): 224-229.

Usage Possibilities of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Flour in Producing of Chicken Meatballs

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 862 - 869, 01.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.439033

Abstract

In this study, mixtures at different ratios of carob flour and breadcrumbs were added in chicken meatballs at level of 5% and their effects on some properties were investigated. Color values of raw samples were determined whereas yield, diameter reduction, color values, moisture retention ratios, fat absorption ratios and sensory properties of fried meatballs at 175 oC for 5 min were established. In the end of the study, it was observed that carob flour increased the a value of raw samples. However, it increased the yield and moisture retention ratios whereas showed that it may be an alternative material in low ratios for sensory properties. Based on the results, it was understood that carob flour: breadcrums mixtures can be recommended at 1:2 and 2:1 ratios in chicken meatballs.

References

  • Anonim, 2002. Offical Methods of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  • Bilek AE, Turhan S, 2009. Enhancement of the Nutritional Status of Beef Patties by Adding Flaxeed Flour. Meat Sciences, 82(4): 472-477.
  • Cava R, Ladero-Cantero L, Ramirez VR, 2012. Assessment of Different Dietary Fibers (tomato fiber, beet root fiber, and inulin) for the Manufacture of Chopped Cooked Chicken Products, Journal of Food Sciences, 77(4): 346-352.
  • Demirci ZO, Yılmaz I, Demirci AŞ, 2014. Effects of Xanthan, Guar, Carrageenan, and Locust Bean Gum Addition on Physical, Chemical, and Sensory Properties of Meatballs, Journal of Food Sciences and Technology, 51(1): 936-942.
  • Dogan S, Sahin S, Sumnu G, 2005. Effects of Soy and Rice Flour Addition on Batter Rheology and Quality of Deep-fat Fried Chicken Nuggets. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(1): 127-132.
  • Egbert RW, Huffman DL, Chen C, Dylewski P. 1991. Development of Low-fat Ground Beef. Food Technology, 45(6): 64-73.
  • Giese J, 1992. Developing Low-fat Meat Products. Food Technology, 46(4): 100-108.
  • Gökalp HY, Kaya M, Tülek Y, Zorba O, 1999. Et ve Ürünlerinde Kalite Kontrolü ve Laboratuvar Uygulama Klavuzu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Yay No: 318, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Ikhlas B, Huda N, Noryati I, 2011. Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Meatballs Prepared from Mechanically Deboned Quail Meat Using Various Types of Flour. International journal of Poultry Science, 10(1): 30-37.
  • Karkacıer M, Artık N, 1995. Keçiboynuzunun (Ceratonia siliqua) Fiziksel Özellikleri, Kimyasal Bileşimi ve Ekstraksiyon Koşulları. Gıda, 20(3): 131-136.
  • Kılınççeker O, 2015. Some Quality Caharacteristics of Fish Meatballs Manufactured with Different Vegetable-based Flours. Gıda, 4(2): 61-67.
  • Kılınççeker O, 2017. Tara, Tragakant ve Agar Agar Gamlarının Tavuk Köftelerde Kullanımı. Gıda, 42(3): 219-228.
  • Kılınççeker O, Hepsağ F, Kurt S, 2015. The Effects of Lentil and Chickpea Flours as the Breading Materials on Some Properties of Chicken Meatballs During Frozen Storage. Journal of Food Sciences and Technology, 52(1): 580-585.
  • Kılınççeker O, Yılmaz MT, 2016. Farklı bitkisel liflerin çiğ ve kızartılmış tavuk köftelerdeki bazı kalite özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Türkiye 12. Gıda Kongresi, 5-7 Ekim 2016, Edirne.
  • Kurt Ş, Kılınççeker O, 2012. The Effects of Cereal and Legume Flours on the Quality Characteristics of Beef Patties. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(5): 725-730.
  • Pazır F, Alper Y, 2016. Keçiboynuzu Meyvesi (Ceratonia siliqua L.) ve Sağlık. Akademik Gıda, 14(3): 302-306.
  • Pinero MP, Parra K, Huerta-Leidenz N, Moreno LA, Ferrer M, Araujo S, Barboza Y 2008. Effect of Oat’s Soluble (β-glucan) as a Fat Replacer on Physical, Chemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Low-fat Beef Patties. Meat Science, 80(3): 675–680.
  • Santhi D, Kalaikannan A, 2014. The Effect of Addition of Oat Flour in Low-fat Chicken Nuggets. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 4(1): 1-4.
  • Serdaroğlu M, Değirmencioğlu Ö, 2004. Effects of Fat Level (5%, 10%, 20%) and Corn Flour (0%, 2%, 4%) on Some Properties of Turkish Type Meatballs (koefte). Meat Sciences, 68(2): 291-296.
  • Soltanizadeh N, Ghiasi-Esfahani H, 2015. Qualitative Improvement of Low Meat Beef Burger Using Aloe vera. Meat Science, 99(1): 75-80.
  • Soyer A, Kolsarıcı N, Candoğan K, 1999. Tavuk Etlerinin Baz Kalite Özellikleri ve Besin Ögelerine Geleneksel ve Mikrodalga ile Pişirme Yöntemlerinin Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23(2): 289-296.
  • Talukder S, Sharma DP, 2010. Development of Dietary Fiber Rich Chicken Meat patties Using Wheat and Oat Bran, Journal of Food Science and Technology - Mysore, 47(2): 224-229.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Food Engineering
Journal Section Gıda Mühendisliği / Food Engineering
Authors

Osman Kılıncçeker 0000-0002-5222-1775

Ali Mücahit Karahan 0000-0001-8779-4349

Publication Date June 1, 2019
Submission Date June 29, 2018
Acceptance Date December 15, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kılıncçeker, O., & Karahan, A. M. (2019). Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(2), 862-869. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.439033
AMA Kılıncçeker O, Karahan AM. Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. June 2019;9(2):862-869. doi:10.21597/jist.439033
Chicago Kılıncçeker, Osman, and Ali Mücahit Karahan. “Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia Siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 9, no. 2 (June 2019): 862-69. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.439033.
EndNote Kılıncçeker O, Karahan AM (June 1, 2019) Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 9 2 862–869.
IEEE O. Kılıncçeker and A. M. Karahan, “Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 862–869, 2019, doi: 10.21597/jist.439033.
ISNAD Kılıncçeker, Osman - Karahan, Ali Mücahit. “Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia Siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 9/2 (June 2019), 862-869. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.439033.
JAMA Kılıncçeker O, Karahan AM. Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2019;9:862–869.
MLA Kılıncçeker, Osman and Ali Mücahit Karahan. “Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia Siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, pp. 862-9, doi:10.21597/jist.439033.
Vancouver Kılıncçeker O, Karahan AM. Keçiboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Ununun Tavuk Köfte Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2019;9(2):862-9.