Doğal Afetler Konusunun Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamında Öğretimi: AFAD Gezisi

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 91 - 113, 21.12.2020

Turgay Nalkıran , Orhan Karamustafaoğlu

Abstract

Education is undoubtedly one of the most important factors primarily affected by the developments in the world and also trigger them. Therefore, education covering every time and field of human life, must keep up with the developments in the world. Now that education is a job that cannot be trapped between four walls and can be done outside the school and in any field. In this day and time, when student-centered teaching strategies are tried to be implemented, a sense of modern teaching in which students actively participate the whole process, learn by doing and experiencing, associate the topics with their daily lives and establish connections with their social lives is dominant. Accordingly, abiding by the scientific foundations, rapidly transforming and developing education systems aim to raise individuals who can make observation and research, solve problems through scientific methods, meet their own needs and have the ability to live independently. In line with this goal, the importance and influence of out-of-school learning environments as well as the schools’ is increasing day by day.
In this study, it was aimed to determine how the teaching of natural disasters subject within the scope of primary school 2nd grade, carried out during the Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (DEMP) trip as an out of school learning environment, would contribute to the students. In this research done via phenomenology method under qualitative approach, the sample was created by 17 students in the 2-A class continuing their education at Bilnet Schools Samsun Campus in Samsun province, İlkadım district through easy access sampling method. The data obtained via the semi-structured interview forms applied before and after the trip and the meaning analysis table used during the trip, were analyzed by descriptive analysis method. In accordance with the trip plan, many teaching activities such as presentation, expression, examples for professional experiences and practices from daily life in accordance with the curriculum were organized respectively in the conference hall, the earthquake simulation truck, the earthquake debris zone, the dog training center, the echelon building and warehouses, the construction equipment park.
According to the data obtained from interviews and meaning analysis table, it was understood that the students were aware of natural disasters such as earthquake, fire, flood etc.; only half of them had heard about DEMP and partially known about its functions before; the presentations made in the conference hall, the teaching carried out in the earthquake simulation truck, the earthquake debris zone, the dog training center, the echelon building and warehouses, the construction equipment park were interesting, entertaining, informative and could provide permanent learning. Based on the data, almost all students found the teaching in DEMP as an out-of-school learning environment very enjoyable and elucidative. In addition, it was concluded that this kind of out-of-school environments would also contribute to the teaching of different subjects and so better learning could be provided by experiencing. In this context, it was observed that the students were highly satisfied with the lesson and thus the activities related to it had a positive effect on them. Within the scope of the research results, in order to provide learning by doing and experiencing, some necessary suggestions were made for the researchers wanting to study in this field, such as trips to various out-of-school environments should be organized for different lessons or subjects, considering the factors as transportation and accommodation new researches should be designed for longer-term and different learning environments (not daily and non-city trips), and for different subjects longitudinal studies in which the trips to different out-of-school learning environments can be compared, should be done.

Keywords

Out-of-school learning environment, natural disasters, DEMP

References

• Bakioğlu, B., Karamustafaoğlu, O., Karamustafaoğlu, S. & Yapıcı, Ş. (2018). The effects of out-of-school learning settings science activities on 5th graders’ academic achievement, European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 451-464.
• Balkan Kıyıcı, F., & Atabek Yiğit, E. (2010). Science education beyond the classroom: A field trip to wind power plant. International Online Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.
• Berberoğlu, O. E., & Uygun S. (2013). Sınıf Dışı Eğitimin Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Gelişiminin İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 32-42.
• Bowker, R. & Tearle, P. (2007). Gardening as a learning environment: A study of children’s perceptions and understanding of school gardens as part of an international project. Learning Environments Research, 10(2), 83-100.
• Bozdoğan, A. E. (2012). Eğitim amaçlı gezilerin planlanmasına ilişkin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının uygulamaları: Altı farklı alan gezisinin değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(2), 1050-1072.
• Bozdoğan, A. E. (2007). Bilim ve teknoloji müzelerinin fen öğretimindeki yeri ve önemi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Bozdoğan, A. E. & Yalçın, N. (2006). Bilim merkezlerinin ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fene karşı ilgi düzeylerinin değişmesine ve akademik başarısına etkisi: Enerji parkı. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 2(7), 95-114.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E. Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Demir, M. K. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının gözlem gezisi yöntemine bakış açılarının incelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(3), 83-98.
• Demirbaş, M. (2005). Fen Bilgisi Öğretiminde Sosyal Öğrenme Teorisinin Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Dillon J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D. & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107- 111.
• Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography-STCSE students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel
• Erdemir, N. (2009) Determining students' attitude towards physics through problem-solving strategy. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 1-19.
• Ertaş, H., Şen, A. İ. & Parmasızoğlu, A. (2011). Okul dışı bilimsel etkinliklerin 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin enerji konusunu günlük hayatla ilişkilendirme düzeyine etkisi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 5(2), 178-198.
• Erten, Z. & Taşçı, G. (2016). Fen bilgisi dersine yönelik okul dışı öğrenme ortamları etkinliklerinin geliştirilmesi ve öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 638-657.
• Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 171-190.
• Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (2001). Development of an informal learning opportunities assay. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 569–583.
• Kete, R. & Horasan, Y. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının uygulamalı (doğa merkezli) Biyoloji derslerinde verimlilikleri. VI. Ulusal Lisansüstü Eğitim Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı II, Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
• Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 86(6), 936–955.
• Kozak, M. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma: tasarım, yazım ve yayım teknikleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Lacin Şimşek, C. (2011). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamları ve fen eğitimi. Fen öğretiminde okul dışı öğrenme ortamları. (Ed. Laçin Şimşek, 2011). Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 88-90.
• Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
• MEB -Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı- (2018). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı, Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Okur-Berberoğlu, E., & Uygun, S. (2013). Sınıf dışı eğitimin dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki gelişiminin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 32-42.
• Özgen, N. (2011). Fiziki Coğrafya dersi öğretim metoduna farklı bir yaklaşım: Gezi-gözlem destekli öğretim. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 23, 373-388.
• Özmen, H. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (Ed.) (2019). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri, Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Öztürk, Ş. (2009). Okulda eğitimle bütünleştirilmiş mekân dışı eğitim. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 181, 131- 145.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park London New Delhi: Sage Publications
• Sarıtaş, E. & Çelik, K. (2013). İlkokul öğrencilerinin sınıf kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10 (1), 1185-1201.
• Sontay, G. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2018). The effect of out-of-school science learning environment on the understanding the nature of science of the 7th grade students in secondary school, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 23-31.
• Sontay, G., Tutar, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamları ile fen öğretimi" hakkında öğrenci görüşleri: Planetaryum gezisi. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 1-24.
• Tal, R., Bamberger, Y. & Morag, O. (2005). Guided school visits to natural history museums in Israel: Teachers’ roles. Science Education, 89(6), 920-935.
• Tatar, N. & Bağrıyanık, K.E. (2012). Fen ve Teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin okul dışı eğitime yönelik görüşleri. İlköğretim Online, 11(4), 883-896.
• Titchen, A. & Hobson, D. (2005). Phenomenology. B. Somekh, C. Lewin (Edit.). Research methods in the social sciences. England: Sage Publications
• Tortop H. S. & Özek, N. (2013). Proje tabanlı öğrenmede anlamlı alan gezisi: Güneş enerjisi ve kullanım alanları konusu. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 300-307.
• Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitim bilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel bir araştırma tekniği: Görüşme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(24), 543-559.
• Wolcott, H. (1990). On seeking–andrejecting–validity in qualitative research. In E. Eisner and & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate (pp. 52–121). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Yavuz, M. & Kıyıcı, F. B. (2012). İnformal öğrenme ortamlarının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fene karşı kaygı düzeylerinin değişmesine ve akademik başarılarına etkisi: Hayvanat bahçesi örneği. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Özet Kitabı. Niğde Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Niğde, 106.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları