Washback effect of Turkish foreign language proficiency exam YDS: A scale development study

Year 2019, , 1252 - 1268, 31.12.2019

Murat Polat

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.668404

Abstract

Investigating the possible washback effect of Foreign Language Proficiency Exam called YDS could provide valuable data regarding how test-takers feel about taking this exam. This study aims to design a scale and collect data regarding the possible washback effect of YDS. In the initial phase, with the help of 6 academicians from ELT and testing disciplines, a preliminary draft of an attitude scale was developed. Secondly, the scale was piloted in order to carry out exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Thirdly, the newly developed scale’s psychometric qualities (validity and reliability) were measured. After it was confirmed that the scale which had 4 factors and 13 items was a valid and reliable tool, the data including the views of Turkish academicians were gathered focusing on the washback effect of the YDS via this scale in the final phase. The overall data of this study were collected from 84 state universities with the contribution of 2683 academicians from different disciplines. The findings revealed that YDS has negative backwash effect on Turkish academicians in terms of certain sub-categories including test strategy, motivation, perception and test taker’s psychology.

Keywords

Washback effect; foreign language testing; high stake tests; YDS; proficiency tests; test impact; exploratory factor analysis; confirmatory factor analysis

References

• Airasian, P. (1994). Classroom Assessment (pp. 18-21). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
• Akın, G. (2016). Evaluation of national foreign language test in Turkey. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 11-21. Retrieved in March, 2019 from: http://www.multidisciplinaryjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FULLPAPER
• Alderson, J.C. (1986). Innovations in language testing. In M. Portal (Ed.), Innovations in language testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER Conference (pp. 93-105), Windsor.
• Alderson, J.C., & Wall, D. (1986). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129.
• Brown, J. D. (1998). Testing in Language Programs. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem.
• Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback in Language Testing. Retrieved in May, 2019 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277405452_Washback_in_language_testing_Research_contexts_and_methods
• Ching, P. Y. (2009). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science Foreign Languages, 25, 257-263.
• Cinkara, E., Tosun, Ö. (2017). Face validity study of a small-scale test in a tertiary level intensive EFL program. B.U. Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(2), 395- 410.
• Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2013). Psikolojik test ve değerlendirme, testler ve ölçmeye giriş (E. Tavşancıl, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel.
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. USA: CBS Collage Publishers Company.
• De Vellis, R. F. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme, kuram ve uygulamalar (T. Totan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel.
• Doğan, İ., & Doğan, N. (2014). Adım adım çözümlü parametrik olmayan istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara: Detay.
• Fish, J. (1988). Responses to mandated standardized testing. Educational Researcher, 18, 27-32.
• Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Retrieved in April, 2019 from: http://hosted.jalt.org/test/PDF/Dunkley2.pdf
• Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analysing and Understanding Data. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; Prentice Hall.
• Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2016). The impact of the university entrance exam on EFL education in Turkey: Pre-service English language teachers’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 232, 136-144.
• Heaton, J.B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests. Longman Handbook for Language Teachers. Longman.
• Kitao, S. K., & Kitao, K. (1996). Testing communicative competence. The Internet TESL Journal, 2(5), 1-6.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Külekçi, E. (2016). A concise analysis of the Foreign Language Examination (YDS) in Turkey and its possible washback effects. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 3(4), 303-315. Retrieved in March, 2019 from: http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/141/143
• Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-16.
• McEwen, N. (1995). Introducing accountability in education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 1-17.
• Noble, A.J., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Measurement-driven reform: research on policy, practice, repercussion. Tempe: Arizona University.
• Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: 2013.
• Özmen, K.S. (2011). Washback Effects of Inter University Foreign Language Examination on Foreign Language Competences of Candidate Academics. Novitas Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 5(2), 215-228.
• Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as levers for change. Practice and evaluation. London: Springer. (pp. 98-107).
• Polat, M. (2018). Akademisyenlerin Yabancı Dil Bilgisi Seviye Tespit Sınavı’nın (YDS) Geçerliğiyle İlgili Tutumlarının Belirlenmesi. Retrieved in March, 2019 from: https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/693327
• Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel.
• Shohammy, E. (2006). Language Policy. Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. New York: Routledge.
• Siegel, S. (1977). Davranış bilimleri için parametrik olmayan istatistikler (Y. Topsever, Trans.). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20, 8-11.
• Vieira, A. L. (2011). Preparation of the analysis. Interactive LISREL in practice. London: Springer.
• Wall, D. (1996). Introducing new tests into traditional systems: Insights from general education and from innovation theory. Language testing, 13, 334-354.
• Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28, 499-509.
• Yavuzer, H., & Göver, D. H. (2012). Akademik personelin yabancı dil durumu ve yabancı dil sınavlarına bakısı: Nevsehir örneği. NEÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(2), 136-158.
• Yesilyurt, S. (2016). An attempt for the exploration of academicians’ experiences of the standard foreign language tests held in Turkey through metaphors. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 263-274.