Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 1032 - 1042, 24.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759361

Abstract

References

  • Agheyisi, R. and Fishman, J. A. (1970). Language Attitudes Studies: A Brief Survey of Methodological Approaches, Anthropological Linguistics, 12 (5), 137-157
  • Andrews, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). Ethnic Groups in The Republic of Turkey. Weisbaden: Verlag
  • Antonova_Ünlü, E. et al. (2015). Russian Immigrant Diaspora in Turkey: Language Use, Preference and Attitudes, Turkish Studies, 16:3, 391-410 DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2015.1067864
  • Antonova-Ünlü, E. et al. (2016). Türkiye’de Yaşayan İngiliz Kökenli Göçmenlerin Dil Kullanım, Tercih ve Tutumları, YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1), 56-76
  • Atsız Gökdağ, B. (2011). Doğu Karadeniz’de Konuşulan Diller ve Türkçe ile Etkileşimleri, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 31, 111-134
  • Bangeni, B. and Kapp, R. (2007). Shifting Language Attitudes in Linguistically Diverse Learning Environment in South Africa, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28:4, 253-269 DOI: 10.2167/jmmd495.0
  • Büyükkantarcıoğlu, S. N. (2006). Toplumsal Gerçeklik ve Dil. İstanbul: Multilingual
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. et al (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem
  • Cargile, A. C. and Giles, H. (1997). Understanding Language Attitudes: Exploring Listener Affect and Identity, Language and Communication, 17 (3), 195-217
  • Cengiz, A. K. (2006). Dil-Kültür İlişkisi Açısından Hatay’da İkidillilik. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Hatay
  • Choi, J. K. (2003). Language Attitudes and The Future of Bilingualism: The Case of Paraguay. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6:2, 81-94 DOI: 10.1080/13670050308667774
  • Çetinkaya, S. (2017). Çokdillilik ve Kimlik. The Journal of International Social Research, 10 (50), 371-377
  • Author. (2019). The Language Attitudes of Mersin Arabs in Turkey: Scrutinizing from Five Different Perspectives. In, Kara, Ö. T. and Ulum, Ö. G. (Eds.). Language and Literature II, pp 59-85. Ankara: Akademisyen
  • Edwards, J. (1999). Refining Our Understanding of Language Attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18 (1), 101-110
  • Gawronski, B. (2007). Attitudes Can Be Measured! But What Is an Attitude? Social Cognition, 25 (5), 573-581
  • Karahan, F. (2005). Bilingualism in Turkey. Cohen, J. et al (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp1152-1166. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
  • KONDA (2017). Biz Kimiz? Toplumsal Yapı Araştırması. Retrieved on November 8, 2019 from: http://www.Konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2006_09_KONDA_Toplumsal_Yapi.pdf
  • Kocaoğlu, G. (2019). Language Attitudes of Arabic-Turkish Bilingual Speakers in Hatay Towards Arabic and Turkish. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences: Mersin
  • Liebscher, G. and Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). Language Attitudes in Interaction, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13/2, 195-222
  • Sofu, H. (2009). Language Shift or Maintenance within Three Generations: Examples from Three Turkish-Arabic-Speaking Families, International Journal of Multilingualism, 6:3, 246-257 DOI: 10.1080/14790710902878684
  • Thisaphungo Mukhuba, T. (2005). Bilingualism, Language Attitudes, Language Policy and Language Planning: A Sociolinguistic Perspective, Journal of Language and Learning, 3 (2), 268-278
  • Weisman, E. M. (2001). Bicultural Identity and Language Attitudes: Perspectives of Four Latina Teachers, Urban Education, 36 (2), 203-225
  • Yalınkılıç, K. and Yağmur, K. (2014). Batı Trakya Türklerinin Anadillerine ve Kültürlerine Karşı Tutumları, Bilig, 70, 283-306
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin

Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities

Year 2020, , 1032 - 1042, 24.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759361

Abstract

This current research tries to compare and contrast the language attitudes of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin and Hatay cities located in the East Mediterranean Region of Anatolia. The quantitative results of the language attitude surveys conducted in the two cities by two different researchers (Çetintaş Yıldırım, 2019; Kocaoğlu, 2019) are compared, and qualitative conclusions which can be generalized to the population of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals are obtained. Two different but related themes (language choices and the sense of belonging to a social/cultural identity of the two participant groups) consist of the main focus. Four sets of questions for the identity theme and seven sets of questions for the language choice theme were determined from the surveys and the means of each group for every question were compared and interpreted. The comparison reveals that Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Hatay interiorize Arabic language more than Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin. The first group is more inclined to use Arabic in their professional career and transfer it to the new generations.

References

  • Agheyisi, R. and Fishman, J. A. (1970). Language Attitudes Studies: A Brief Survey of Methodological Approaches, Anthropological Linguistics, 12 (5), 137-157
  • Andrews, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). Ethnic Groups in The Republic of Turkey. Weisbaden: Verlag
  • Antonova_Ünlü, E. et al. (2015). Russian Immigrant Diaspora in Turkey: Language Use, Preference and Attitudes, Turkish Studies, 16:3, 391-410 DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2015.1067864
  • Antonova-Ünlü, E. et al. (2016). Türkiye’de Yaşayan İngiliz Kökenli Göçmenlerin Dil Kullanım, Tercih ve Tutumları, YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1), 56-76
  • Atsız Gökdağ, B. (2011). Doğu Karadeniz’de Konuşulan Diller ve Türkçe ile Etkileşimleri, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 31, 111-134
  • Bangeni, B. and Kapp, R. (2007). Shifting Language Attitudes in Linguistically Diverse Learning Environment in South Africa, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28:4, 253-269 DOI: 10.2167/jmmd495.0
  • Büyükkantarcıoğlu, S. N. (2006). Toplumsal Gerçeklik ve Dil. İstanbul: Multilingual
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. et al (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem
  • Cargile, A. C. and Giles, H. (1997). Understanding Language Attitudes: Exploring Listener Affect and Identity, Language and Communication, 17 (3), 195-217
  • Cengiz, A. K. (2006). Dil-Kültür İlişkisi Açısından Hatay’da İkidillilik. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Hatay
  • Choi, J. K. (2003). Language Attitudes and The Future of Bilingualism: The Case of Paraguay. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6:2, 81-94 DOI: 10.1080/13670050308667774
  • Çetinkaya, S. (2017). Çokdillilik ve Kimlik. The Journal of International Social Research, 10 (50), 371-377
  • Author. (2019). The Language Attitudes of Mersin Arabs in Turkey: Scrutinizing from Five Different Perspectives. In, Kara, Ö. T. and Ulum, Ö. G. (Eds.). Language and Literature II, pp 59-85. Ankara: Akademisyen
  • Edwards, J. (1999). Refining Our Understanding of Language Attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18 (1), 101-110
  • Gawronski, B. (2007). Attitudes Can Be Measured! But What Is an Attitude? Social Cognition, 25 (5), 573-581
  • Karahan, F. (2005). Bilingualism in Turkey. Cohen, J. et al (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp1152-1166. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla
  • KONDA (2017). Biz Kimiz? Toplumsal Yapı Araştırması. Retrieved on November 8, 2019 from: http://www.Konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2006_09_KONDA_Toplumsal_Yapi.pdf
  • Kocaoğlu, G. (2019). Language Attitudes of Arabic-Turkish Bilingual Speakers in Hatay Towards Arabic and Turkish. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences: Mersin
  • Liebscher, G. and Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). Language Attitudes in Interaction, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13/2, 195-222
  • Sofu, H. (2009). Language Shift or Maintenance within Three Generations: Examples from Three Turkish-Arabic-Speaking Families, International Journal of Multilingualism, 6:3, 246-257 DOI: 10.1080/14790710902878684
  • Thisaphungo Mukhuba, T. (2005). Bilingualism, Language Attitudes, Language Policy and Language Planning: A Sociolinguistic Perspective, Journal of Language and Learning, 3 (2), 268-278
  • Weisman, E. M. (2001). Bicultural Identity and Language Attitudes: Perspectives of Four Latina Teachers, Urban Education, 36 (2), 203-225
  • Yalınkılıç, K. and Yağmur, K. (2014). Batı Trakya Türklerinin Anadillerine ve Kültürlerine Karşı Tutumları, Bilig, 70, 283-306
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Filiz Çetintaş Yıldırım

Publication Date June 24, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Çetintaş Yıldırım, F. (2020). Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759361
AMA Çetintaş Yıldırım F. Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. June 2020;16(2):1032-1042. doi:10.17263/jlls.759361
Chicago Çetintaş Yıldırım, Filiz. “Language Choice and Identity: An Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16, no. 2 (June 2020): 1032-42. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759361.
EndNote Çetintaş Yıldırım F (June 1, 2020) Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16 2 1032–1042.
IEEE F. Çetintaş Yıldırım, “Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities”, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1032–1042, 2020, doi: 10.17263/jlls.759361.
ISNAD Çetintaş Yıldırım, Filiz. “Language Choice and Identity: An Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16/2 (June 2020), 1032-1042. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759361.
JAMA Çetintaş Yıldırım F. Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2020;16:1032–1042.
MLA Çetintaş Yıldırım, Filiz. “Language Choice and Identity: An Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1032-4, doi:10.17263/jlls.759361.
Vancouver Çetintaş Yıldırım F. Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2020;16(2):1032-4.