Pragmatics of overlapping talk in therapy sessions

Year 2020, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 1251 - 1263, 01.10.2020

Nawal Fadhil Abbas

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803705

Abstract

Cooperation in conversation is usually managed by the turn- taking mechanism where the interlocutors’ turns are done according to certain rules the most important of which is that ‘one and only one speaker speaks at a time’. Since talk can be used as a cure for people who have troubles in their life, psychotherapy uses the field of conversation analysis as a procedure to deal with such troubles. Conversation analysis with all its essential facts helps therapists find out the reasons behind their patient's difficulties and predict the solutions for them. One of such essentials is that of the turn taking system and more specifically the ‘overlapping talk’. The aim of the present research paper is to show what types of overlap mostly overwhelm the therapy session and how the overlap is managed and resolved. To do so, two scripts taken from two psychological therapy sessions are selected and examined using Sacks et al’s model (1974) and Jefferson’s model (1983). The study has come to the conclusion that the overlapping talk usually occurs because of the misjudgment of the transition relevance places (TRPs) due to its type whether transitional or progressional. It has also been noticed that the terminal overlap is used more frequently than the other types. Continuers such as ‘yeah’, ‘ok’, ‘alright’, ‘aha’, ‘umm’ are used by the therapist to encourage the patients to continue in their turns.

Keywords

overlapping talk, recycling, resolving, therapy session, turn-taking system

References

• Abbas, N., Raja Suleiman, R., and Abdul-Manan, S. (2010). A conversation analysis of some excerpts from Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables. International Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 31, 52-61.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Ghilzai, S. (2015). Conversational Analysis of Turn taking Behavior and Gender: Differences in Multimodal Conversation. European Academic Research, 3 (9), 10100-10116.
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Hussein, K., Khalil, J. and Abbas, N. (2018). Metadiscourse Markers in Master Thesis Abstracts of American and Iraqi English Theses. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 347-3
• Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (2002). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Jefferson G. (1983). Notes on Some Orderliness of Overlap Onset. In her Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation.
• Tilburg papers in language and literature. University of Tilburg, Tilburg Netherlands.
• Kato, F. (2000). Discourse Approach to Turn-Taking from the Perspective of Tone Choice Between Speakers. United Kingdom: University of Birmingham.
• Liddicoa, A. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
• Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Perakyla, A. (2012). Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Perakyla, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S. and Leudar. (2008). Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Regina Wu, R. (2004). Stance in Talk: A conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. San Diego: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Sacks, H. (1992, 1995). Lectures on conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, G., and Jefferson. (1974). A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation, Language, 50(4), 596-735.
• Schegloff, E. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation language in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schegloff, E. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1-63.
• Stolt, M. (2008). The many faces of overlap: Non-competitive overlap in conversations between Finnish and British speakers of English. University of Jyvaskyla.
• Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.
• Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.