Effects of Blended Learning Environment on Professional Competence and Motivation Levels of Coach Candidates

Abstract

Impeding factors which restrain educational activities such as physical impracticability exist in coach training courses, which are mainly caused by organizations, ineffective and insufficient duration of courses to resolve these problems, it is possible to use blended learning methods in coach training courses. Thus, we developed a traditional face-to-face environment for a special education course and an online environment for a fundamental education course using blending approach. The study aimed to investigate the effects of blended learning model proposed for coaching education courses on the motivation levels and professional competence of coach candidates. Participants were the trainees who wanted to participate in the first stage of the coach training course at volleyball branch. The coach candidates in the blended learning environment showed significantly higher motivation levels compared to the others in the control group. In addition, a significant difference between the control and the experiment groups of coach candidates in regard to their professional competence was detected. This study is compelling in terms of strengthening the significance of the blended learning environment, even in coach training.

Keywords

• blended learning,professional competence,motivation,coach training

References

1. Acelajado J. M. (2011). Blended learning: a strategy for improving the mathematics achievement of students in a bridging program. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 5(3), 342-351.
2. Alkan, C. (1997). Educational Technology. (5th Edition). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
3. Bowman, T. G. & Dodge. T. M. (2011). Factors of persistence among graduates of athletic training education programs. Journal of Athletic Training, 46(6), 665-671.
4. Collis, B. (2003). Course redesign for blended learning: modern optics for technical professionals. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1/2), 22-38.
5. Dağ, F. (2011). Recommendations regarding blended (mixed) learning environment and design. Ahi Evran University Education Faculty Journal, 12(2), 73-97.
6. Demirelli, B. (2009). The investigation of the efficiency of the first stage deputy coach training courses conducted by Ministry of Youth and Sports General Directorate of Sports Training Department. Master’s Thesis. Dumlupınar University. Kütahya.
7. Devecioğlu, S., Çoban, B., & Karakaya, Y., E. (2011). The view of Sports Training Sector in Turkey. The Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 627-654.
8. Efe, A. R., (2010). Comparison of physical education and sports teaching and coaching education curriculum in Austria and Turkey. Masters Thesis. Sakarya University, Sakarya.

9. Fook, F. S., Kong, N. W., Lan, O. S., Atan, H., & Idrus, R. (2005). Research in e-learning in a hybrid environment - A case for blended instruction. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 124-136.
10. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles and guidelines. Wiley Publisher Jossey-Bass.
11. Güçlü, M. (2001). The development of physical education and sport in Turkey, Europe, the United States, and China, National Education Journal, Number: 150. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/150/guclu.htm Retrieved 02.10.2015
12. Johnson, J. (2002). Reflections on teaching a large enrollment course using a hybrid format. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/jjohnson.htm Retrieved 10.05.2013
13. Karadeniz Ş., & Uluyol Ç. (2009). An example of a blended learning environment: student achievement and opinions. Yüzüncü Yıl University Education Faculty Journal, 1, 60-84.
14. Lee, T. H., Shen, P. D., & Tsai, C. W. (2010). Enhance low-achieving students’ learning involvement in Taiwan's higher education: an approach via e-learning with problem-based learning and self-regulated learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 553-565.
15. Morgan, K. R. (2002). Blended learning: a strategic action plan for a new campus. Seminole: University of Central Florida.
16. Özerbaş, A. (2003). The effect of computer-aided allied teaching on student achievement, the motivation and transfer skills. Doctoral Dissertation. Ankara University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.
17. Özer, K. (1990). Sports education. Sports Council Declaration, Publications of the Ministry of Youth and Sports General Directorate, Ankara.
18. Pankin, J., Roberts, J., & Savio, M. (2012). Blended learning at MIT. http://web.mit.edu/training/trainers/resources/blended_learning_at_mit.pdf Retrieved 04.03.2015
19. Rahmani, F., M., & Deugherty, C., L. (2007). Supporting the hybrid learning model: a new proposition. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(1). http://www.spectrumpacific.org/assets/resources/pageResources/Supporting_the_Hybrid_Learning_Model.pdf Retrieved 03.14.2015
20. Sarıtepeci, M. (2012). Impact of blended learning environments on students' attendance, academic achievement, attitudes towards the course and motivation in 7th grade social studies course . Masters Thesis. Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.
21. Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra Software. Lexington. http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wbts/wbt2014/blend-ce.pdf Retrieved 04.02.2015
22. Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2013). Blended learning or e-learning? International magazine on advances in computer science and telecommunications (IMACST), 3 (1), 103-110. http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4085 Retrieved 04.10.2015
23. Tiryaki, G., (1994). In preparation for the Olympics, scientific and talent selection. Istanbul Technical University, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Turkey and the Olympic Theme Symposium, İstanbul.
24. Tozoğlu, E. (2003). Leadership qualities of the coaches involved in different sports and relationships between these features and some variables. Master's Thesis. Ataturk University, Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.
25. Osguthorpe, R., T., & Graham C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
26. Wilson, D., & Smilanich, E. (2005). The other blended learning: a classroom-centered approach. Pfeiffer. San Francisco.
27. Yıldız, B. (2011). Effect of blended learning course on 7th grade social studies academic achievement. Masters’ Thesis. Celal Bayar University, Institute of Social Sciences, Manisa.