BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 16 - 23, 01.01.2020

Abstract

References

  • Almeida, D. E. (2002). To chat or not to chat in the EFL classroom, that is the question. In Language–Communication–Culture International Conference, University of Évora, Portugal, (Vol. 29).
  • Aydin, S. (2013). Second life as a foreign language learning environment: A review of research. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 53-63.
  • Biagi, S. (1996) Media Reader, Wadsworth, New York.
  • Chen, G.D., Chang, C.K. & Wang, C.Y. (2008) Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware technique: Computer and Education, 50(1), 77-90.
  • Cui, G.&Wang, S. (2008) Adopting cell phones in EFL teaching and learning: Journal of Educational Technology and Exchange, 1(1), 6.
  • Davis, N. E. (2000) Teacher education in the information age: Working with ICT’s influence. Invited speech and paper to the IFUT conference towards: 2010 Teacher Education in Ireland over the Next Decade, Dublin.
  • Dror, I. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad and the ugly. Pragmatics Cognition, 2(2), 215-223.
  • Fahd, A., Tugrul, U., & Robert, H. (2015). Exploring the adoption and use of the smart phone technology in emerging regions: A literature review and hypotheses development. Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). 2015 Portland International Conference.
  • Gonzalez, D. (2003). Teaching and learning through chat: A taxonomy of educational chat for EFL/ESL. Teaching English with Technology, 3(4), 57-69.
  • Graddol, D. (1997). English as a global language: Cambridge, Cambridge Press.
  • Graddol, D. (2006). English next (Vol. 62). London: British council.
  • Guzel, S. & Aydin, S. (2016). The effect of second life on speaking achievement. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(4), 236-245.
  • Kazemi, A., & Narafshan, M. H. (2014). Technology and English language teaching (ELT). Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6), 60-67.
  • Lepp, A. Barkley, J.E. & Karpinski, A.C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety and satisfaction with life in college students. Computer in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350.
  • Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–341.
  • Marshall, G. (2005). The purpose, design and administration of a questionnaire for data collection, 11(2), 131–136.
  • Mary, A., Malina, H., Norreklit, Selto, F. (2011) Lessons learned: Advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 59–71.
  • Nawaila, M. B., & Bicen, H. (2018). WhatsApp as a tool for distance learning. Ponte Journal, 74(1).
  • Nawaila, M. B., Kanbul, S., & Uzunboylu, H. (2018). Toward Making Social Media Effective in our Classrooms: A 9-Point Method. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(4).
  • Nomass, B. B. (2013). The impact of using technologies in teaching English as a second language. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 111-116.
  • Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980-2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 559-580.
  • Statista. (2013). Number of mobile phone users worldwide from 2013 to 2019.
  • Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving students' pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303-316.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00459.x.
  • Sharma, P. (2009). Controversies in using technology in language teaching. Retrieved from
  • http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/controversies-using-technology-language-teaching.
  • Sozbilir, M. & Kutu, H. (2008). Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays in Education, Special Issue, 1-22.
  • Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(6). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-Internet.html.
  • Solanki D. Shyamlee. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture.
  • Stanley, G. (2013). Integrating technology into secondary English language teaching. Innovations in Learning Technologies for English Language Teaching. London: British Council, 45-66.
  • Tomei, L. A. (2002). The technology facade: Overcoming Barriers to Effective Instructional Technology. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tobi, S. N. M., Ma'on, S. N., & Ghazali, N. (2013). The use of online social networking and quality of life. In Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering, and Environment (TIME-E), 2013 International Conference (pp. 131-135). IEEE.
  • knowledge, and teaching. In Constructivism in Science Education (pp. 11-30). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). Review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 13, 235–286.
  • Ybarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ybarra-Technology.

Technology and English Language Teaching and Learning: A Content Analysis

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 16 - 23, 01.01.2020

Abstract

Researchers over the past years have proven the positive effects of using information and communication technology in learning. This research work considers the digital nature of modern students associated with educational technologies and their importance in learning English through the medium best known to modern students. A review of related literature with a sole purpose of measuring the recent research trends on the contributions of innovative technology towards English language learning and teaching. To measure the trends on technology contributions in English teaching, quantitative content analysis method was employed for the purpose of this research where fifty academic articles published between the years 2000 – 2018 were considered for being relevant and available with full text open access and written in English language. Twenty-six of which from EBSCO and twenty four from Science Direct Database, under the title of social sciences: Teaching of English by innovative technology, obtained from the Near East University library, online resources, serve as the source of data collection. SPSS software will be the data analysis tool.

References

  • Almeida, D. E. (2002). To chat or not to chat in the EFL classroom, that is the question. In Language–Communication–Culture International Conference, University of Évora, Portugal, (Vol. 29).
  • Aydin, S. (2013). Second life as a foreign language learning environment: A review of research. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 53-63.
  • Biagi, S. (1996) Media Reader, Wadsworth, New York.
  • Chen, G.D., Chang, C.K. & Wang, C.Y. (2008) Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware technique: Computer and Education, 50(1), 77-90.
  • Cui, G.&Wang, S. (2008) Adopting cell phones in EFL teaching and learning: Journal of Educational Technology and Exchange, 1(1), 6.
  • Davis, N. E. (2000) Teacher education in the information age: Working with ICT’s influence. Invited speech and paper to the IFUT conference towards: 2010 Teacher Education in Ireland over the Next Decade, Dublin.
  • Dror, I. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad and the ugly. Pragmatics Cognition, 2(2), 215-223.
  • Fahd, A., Tugrul, U., & Robert, H. (2015). Exploring the adoption and use of the smart phone technology in emerging regions: A literature review and hypotheses development. Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). 2015 Portland International Conference.
  • Gonzalez, D. (2003). Teaching and learning through chat: A taxonomy of educational chat for EFL/ESL. Teaching English with Technology, 3(4), 57-69.
  • Graddol, D. (1997). English as a global language: Cambridge, Cambridge Press.
  • Graddol, D. (2006). English next (Vol. 62). London: British council.
  • Guzel, S. & Aydin, S. (2016). The effect of second life on speaking achievement. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(4), 236-245.
  • Kazemi, A., & Narafshan, M. H. (2014). Technology and English language teaching (ELT). Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6), 60-67.
  • Lepp, A. Barkley, J.E. & Karpinski, A.C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety and satisfaction with life in college students. Computer in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350.
  • Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–341.
  • Marshall, G. (2005). The purpose, design and administration of a questionnaire for data collection, 11(2), 131–136.
  • Mary, A., Malina, H., Norreklit, Selto, F. (2011) Lessons learned: Advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 59–71.
  • Nawaila, M. B., & Bicen, H. (2018). WhatsApp as a tool for distance learning. Ponte Journal, 74(1).
  • Nawaila, M. B., Kanbul, S., & Uzunboylu, H. (2018). Toward Making Social Media Effective in our Classrooms: A 9-Point Method. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(4).
  • Nomass, B. B. (2013). The impact of using technologies in teaching English as a second language. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 111-116.
  • Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980-2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 559-580.
  • Statista. (2013). Number of mobile phone users worldwide from 2013 to 2019.
  • Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving students' pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303-316.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00459.x.
  • Sharma, P. (2009). Controversies in using technology in language teaching. Retrieved from
  • http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/controversies-using-technology-language-teaching.
  • Sozbilir, M. & Kutu, H. (2008). Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays in Education, Special Issue, 1-22.
  • Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(6). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-Internet.html.
  • Solanki D. Shyamlee. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture.
  • Stanley, G. (2013). Integrating technology into secondary English language teaching. Innovations in Learning Technologies for English Language Teaching. London: British Council, 45-66.
  • Tomei, L. A. (2002). The technology facade: Overcoming Barriers to Effective Instructional Technology. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tobi, S. N. M., Ma'on, S. N., & Ghazali, N. (2013). The use of online social networking and quality of life. In Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering, and Environment (TIME-E), 2013 International Conference (pp. 131-135). IEEE.
  • knowledge, and teaching. In Constructivism in Science Education (pp. 11-30). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). Review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 13, 235–286.
  • Ybarra, R., & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL/EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ybarra-Technology.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Muhammad Bello Nawaila This is me

Sezer Kanbul This is me

Radwan Alhamroni This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Nawaila, M. B., Kanbul, S., & Alhamroni, R. (2020). Technology and English Language Teaching and Learning: A Content Analysis. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 5(1), 16-23.

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 2023. © 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 19195

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age. All rights reserved, 2023. ISSN:2458-8350