Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 40 - 45, 02.07.2021

Abstract

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Akerson, V. L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo M., Khan, T.A., & Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning ofSTEM: Implications for Science Education and Science Education Research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-8.
  • Beheshti, E., Weintrop, D., Swanson, H., Orton, K., Horn, M., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Computational Thinking in Practice: How STEM Professionals Use CT in Their Work. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. Paper retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10026245
  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: Q11 NSTA Press.
  • Conderman, G., & Woods, S. (2008). Science Instruction: An Endangered Species. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(2), 76- 80.
  • Dillon, S. (March 26, 2006). Schools push back subjects to push reading and math. New York Times. http://nytimes.com/2006/03/26/education/26child.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
  • Duke, N. & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In Farstrup, A. E. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Johnson. C. C. (2012). Implementation of STEM Education Policy: Challenges, Progress, and Lessons Learned. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 45-55.
  • Keefe, B. (2010). The perception of STEM: Analysis, issues and future directions. Entertainment and Media Industries Council.
  • Kemple, J. J., Corrin,W., Nelson, E., Salinger, T., Herrmann, S., & Drummon, K. (2008). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Early Impacts and Implementation Findings (NCEE 2008-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
  • Gamse, B.C., Jacob, R.T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., and Unlu, F. (2008). Reading First Impact Study Final Report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20094038.pdf
  • Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell, & N.G. Lederman, (Eds), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McMurrer, J. (February 20, 2008). NCLB Year 5: Instructional Time in Elementary Schools: A Closer Look at Changes for Specific Subjects. Center on Education Policy. https://www.cepdc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=309
  • McNeill, N. J., Douglass, E. P., Koro-Ljunberg, M., Therriault, D., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students’ beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560-584.
  • NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Resource Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pratt, H. (2007). Science education’s overlooked ingredient: Why the path to global competitiveness begins in elementary school. NSTA Press. http://science.nsta.org/nstaexpress/nstaexpress_2007_10_29_pratt.htm Accessed November 14, 2013.
  • Swanson, H., Anton, G., Bain, C., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Computational thinking in science classroom. Paper presented in the International Conference on Computational Thinking Education. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/cte2017/doc/CTE2017%20Proceedings.pdf
  • Vasquez, J., A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM Lesson Essentials: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127- 147.
  • Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5-22.
  • Wilensky, U., Brady, C. E., & Horn, M. S. (2014). Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 57(8), 24-28.
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

ERRATUM: "Integrating Engineering, Science, Reading, and Robotics across Grades 3-8 in a STEM Education Era"

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 40 - 45, 02.07.2021

Abstract

In the article, Deniz, H , Kaya, E , Yesilyurt, E , Newley, A , Lin, E . (2021). Integrating Engineering, Science, Reading, and Robotics across Grades 3-8 in a STEM Education Era . Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age , 6 (1) , 40-45 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/joltida/issue/59433/854125,

1. The publication year was corrected as "2021".
2. One of the authors name was corrected as "Anna Newley".

The publisher regrets the errors.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Akerson, V. L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo M., Khan, T.A., & Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning ofSTEM: Implications for Science Education and Science Education Research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-8.
  • Beheshti, E., Weintrop, D., Swanson, H., Orton, K., Horn, M., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Computational Thinking in Practice: How STEM Professionals Use CT in Their Work. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. Paper retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10026245
  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: Q11 NSTA Press.
  • Conderman, G., & Woods, S. (2008). Science Instruction: An Endangered Species. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(2), 76- 80.
  • Dillon, S. (March 26, 2006). Schools push back subjects to push reading and math. New York Times. http://nytimes.com/2006/03/26/education/26child.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
  • Duke, N. & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In Farstrup, A. E. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Johnson. C. C. (2012). Implementation of STEM Education Policy: Challenges, Progress, and Lessons Learned. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 45-55.
  • Keefe, B. (2010). The perception of STEM: Analysis, issues and future directions. Entertainment and Media Industries Council.
  • Kemple, J. J., Corrin,W., Nelson, E., Salinger, T., Herrmann, S., & Drummon, K. (2008). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Early Impacts and Implementation Findings (NCEE 2008-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
  • Gamse, B.C., Jacob, R.T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., and Unlu, F. (2008). Reading First Impact Study Final Report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20094038.pdf
  • Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell, & N.G. Lederman, (Eds), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McMurrer, J. (February 20, 2008). NCLB Year 5: Instructional Time in Elementary Schools: A Closer Look at Changes for Specific Subjects. Center on Education Policy. https://www.cepdc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=309
  • McNeill, N. J., Douglass, E. P., Koro-Ljunberg, M., Therriault, D., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students’ beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560-584.
  • NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Resource Council (1996). National Science Education Standards, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pratt, H. (2007). Science education’s overlooked ingredient: Why the path to global competitiveness begins in elementary school. NSTA Press. http://science.nsta.org/nstaexpress/nstaexpress_2007_10_29_pratt.htm Accessed November 14, 2013.
  • Swanson, H., Anton, G., Bain, C., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Computational thinking in science classroom. Paper presented in the International Conference on Computational Thinking Education. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/cte2017/doc/CTE2017%20Proceedings.pdf
  • Vasquez, J., A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM Lesson Essentials: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127- 147.
  • Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5-22.
  • Wilensky, U., Brady, C. E., & Horn, M. S. (2014). Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 57(8), 24-28.
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Computer Software
Journal Section Erratum
Authors

Hasan Deniz 0000-0001-9646-6865

Erdogan Kaya This is me 0000-0003-1259-2595

Ezgi Yesılyurt This is me 0000-0002-1612-9904

Anna Newley This is me 0000-0002-6031-1906

Emily Lın This is me

Publication Date July 2, 2021
Submission Date August 13, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Deniz, H., Kaya, E., Yesılyurt, E., Newley, A., et al. (2021). ERRATUM: "Integrating Engineering, Science, Reading, and Robotics across Grades 3-8 in a STEM Education Era". Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 6(2), 40-45.

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age 2023. © 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 19195

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age. All rights reserved, 2023. ISSN:2458-8350