Multimodality in Distance Education during Covid-19: Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 43 - 54, 10.07.2024

Halil İbrahim Şahin , Mehmet Altay

https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1334294

Abstract

With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world were forced to take emergency measures in every aspect of life including education. Instead of the prevalent face-to-face mode of teaching, institutions turned to online teaching one by one. This brought many issues along with it. Because of distance education, it became quite challenging for teachers to maintain the multimodal nature of communication. This research aims to examine in-service teachers’ perceptions and actual practices regarding multimodal instruction in online lessons during the COVID-19 pandemic from a descriptive point of view. The research followed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Firstly, to examine the beliefs and preferences of teachers, a 24-item questionnaire (henceforth Multimodal Teaching Questionnaire) that was adapted from a previously developed questionnaire by Bulut et al. (2015) was used. Secondly, 72 hours of distance lessons from 36 teachers were observed via Zoom online conferencing tool. The results showed a discrepancy between the teachers’ statements and their actual practices regarding multimodality. While most of them reported extensive use of multimodality in their instruction, observations showed that in the majority of their lessons, only one or two modes were used.

Keywords

multimodality, distance education, Covid-19, teacher training, social semiotics

References

• Ajayi, L. (2010). Preservice teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and perception of their preparation to teach multiliteracies/multimodality. The Teacher Educator, 46(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.488279
• Akayoglu, S., Satar, M., Dikilitas, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85-97.
• Ally, F., Pillay, J. D., & Govender, N. (2022). Teaching and learning considerations during the COVID‑19 pandemic: Supporting multimodal student learning preferences. African Journal of Health Professions Education 14(1), 13-16.
• Andrews, J., Holmes P., Fay, R., & Dawson, S. (2020). Researching multilingually in applied linguistics. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
• Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). Science teachers' views on distance education in the COVID-19 pandemic process. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129.
• Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. London: Oakville, Equinox.
• Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bateman, J., Wildfeuer, J., & Hiippala (2017). Multimodality. De Gruyter Mouton.
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: Internal Society for Technology in Education.
• Board of Education and Discipline (2018). English language teaching curriculum. Retrieved September 5th 2022 from: https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812411191321-%C4%B0NG%C4%B0L%C4%B0ZCE%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20Klas%C3%B6r%C3%BC.pdf
• Bonk, C.J. & Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass/Pfeiffer.
• Bulut, B., Ulu, H., & Kan, A. (2015). Multimodal literacy scale: A study of validity and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 45-60.
• Cárcamo, M. M. A., Cartes, R. A. C., Velásquez, N. E. E., & Larenas, C. H. D. (2016). The impact of multimodal instruction on the acquisition of vocabulary. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 55(1), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.1590/010318134842170942
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
• Dörnyei, Z. & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
• Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2022) The multimodal facilitation effect in human communication. Psychon Bull Rev. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02178-x
• Ekşi, G., & Yılmaz Yakışık, B. (2015). An investigation of prospective English language teachers’multimodal literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 464-471.
• Friedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Gilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The effect of multimodal learning models on language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1321-1327. Doi:10.4304/tpls.1.10.1321-1327
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. V. Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-182). London: Sage Publications.
• Gök, A. & Yıldırım, Z. (2015). Views and demands of teachers about in-service training within the scope of Fatih Project. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), 1453-1468.
• University of London. (2023, July 12). History of the University of London. https://www.london.ac.uk/about-us/history-university-london
• Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication. Trends in cognitive sciences, 23(8), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
• Jewitt, C. (Ed.) (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
• Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford University Press.
• Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
• Kress, G. (2014). Design. In A. Archer & D. Newfield (Eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy: Recognition, resources and access (pp. 131-152). Routledge
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.
• Lemke, J. (2009). Multimodal genres and transmedia traversals: Social semiotics and the political economy of the sign. Semiotica, 2009(173), 283-297. Doi: 10.1515/semi.2009.012
• Masalimova, A. R., Khvatova, M.A., Chikileva, L.S., Zvyagintseva, E. P., Stepanova, V. V. & Melnik, M. V. (2022). Distance Learning in Higher Education During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7(822958). Doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
• Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice-Hall.
• O'Halloran, K. L. (1999). Interdependence, interaction and metaphor in multisemiotic texts. Social Semiotics, 9(3), 317-354. Doi: 10.1080/10350339909360442
• O’Toole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
• O’Toole, M. (2010). The language of displayed art. Routledge.
• Papageorgiou, V., & Lameras, P. (2017). Multimodal teaching and learning with the use of technology: Meanings, practices and discourses. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 133-141.
• Perniss, P. (2018). Why we should study multimodal language. Front. Psychol, 9(1109), 1-5. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109
• Ryu, J., & Boggs, G. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about teaching multimodal composition: The case study of Korean English teachers at secondary schools. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 52-60.
• Sankey, M. D. (2006). A neomillennial learning approach: Helping non-traditional learners studying at a distance. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2(4), 82-99.
• Sari, I. P., Sormin, R. K., Purba, A., Setiawati. & Siregar, E. S. (2023). The implementation of multimodal approach to teaching English online in the COVID–19. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 7-19. DOI: 10.52622/joal.v3i1.140.
• Schuir, J., Anton, E., Eleks, M. & Teuteberg, F. (2022). Tell me and I forget, involve me and I learn: Design and evaluation of a multimodal conversational agent for supporting distance learning. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2022/digital_education/digital_education/2
• Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1983). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Tan, X., & Matsuda, P. K. (2020). Teacher beliefs and pedagogical practices of integrating multimodality into first-year composition. Computers and Composition, 58(2020), 102614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102614
• Thompson, M. (2008). Multimodal teaching and learning: Creating spaces for content teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 144–153. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20111751
• Tüzel, S. (2013). Integrating multimodal literacy instruction into Turkish language teacher education: An action research study. Anthropologist, 16(3), 619-630.
• Ulu, H., Avşar-Tuncay, A. & Baş, Ö. (2017). The relationship between multimodal literacy of pre-service teachers and their perception of self-efficacy in critical reading. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 85–91.
• Ulu, H., & Avşar-Tuncay, A. (2017). Investigation of multimodal literacy levels of pre-service teachers. Turkish Studies, 12(25), 763–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12303
• Vasudevan, L., DeJaynes, T., & Schmier, S. (2010). Multimodal pedagogies: Playing, teaching, and learning with adolescents’ digital literacies. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents’ online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, and online culture (pp. 5-26). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
• Yi, Y., & Choi, J. (2015). Teachers' views of multimodal practices in K-12 classrooms: Voices from teachers in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 838-847. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43893789