Clickbait Culture in Internet Journalism: The Digital Way of “Selling News”

Abstract

This study explores the historical roots, transformation within media culture, and ethical issues of clickbait journalism, which has long been a significant concern in Türkiye as well. Since the traditional era of the press, sensational news presentation has been prominent; however, with the rise of the internet, it has evolved to include various new strategies, shifting the focus from news quality to click rates. Clickbait journalism frequently employs techniques such as exaggeration, ambiguity, emotional intensity, and visual manipulation in both headlines and content. This practice is used to capture readers’ attention and to generate revenue through online advertising. The article examines examples of clickbait journalism from around the world and Türkiye, emphasizing the ethical challenges and potential consequences of misleading content, particularly in sensitive areas such as health and politics. Furthermore, it discusses how algorithms and social media platforms reinforce this culture through the concepts of “filter bubble” and “echo chamber.” In the conclusion, the article presents a set of nine recommendations addressing clickbait journalism, with a focus on strengthening media literacy and preserving professional and ethical principles in journalism.

Keywords

• Clickbait
• Journalism
• Internet Journalism
• Algorithms

İnternet Gazeteciliğinde Clickbait (Tık Tuzağı) Kültürü: “Haberi Satma”nın Dijital Hâli

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de de uzunca bir süredir önemli bir sorunsal olan clickbait (tık tuzağı) haberciliğinin tarihsel kökenlerini, medya kültürü içindeki dönüşümünü ve etik sorunlarını ele almaktadır. Basının geleneksel döneminden itibaren sansasyonel içeriklerle öne çıkan haber sunumu, internetin yaygınlaşmasıyla daha farklı stratejileri içinde barındıran bir hal almış ve haberin niteliğinden çok tıklanma oranları öncelik kazanmıştır. Clickbait gazeteciliği, başlık ve içeriklerde abartı, belirsizlik, duygusal yoğunluk ve görsel manipülasyon gibi stratejilere sıkça başvurmaktadır. Bu pratik, hem okuyucunun dikkatini çekmek hem de internet reklamlarından gelir sağlamak amacıyla uygulanmaktadır. Makalede dünya ve Türkiye’den clickbait gazeteciliğe dair örnekler irdelenerek verilmiş, özellikle sağlık ve siyaset gibi hassas konulardaki yanıltıcı içeriklerin doğurabileceği etik sorunlar ve sonuçlar üzerinde durulmuştur. Ayrıca algoritmaların ve sosyal medya platformlarının bu kültürü nasıl beslediği, “filtre balonu” ve “yankı odası” kavramlarıyla açıklanmıştır. Makalenin sonuç kısmında da medya okuryazarlığının güçlendirilmesi ve etik gazetecilik meslek ve etik ilkelerinin korunması amacıyla clickbait gazeteciliğe ilişkin dokuz maddelik öneri oluşturulmuştur.

Keywords

• Clickbait
• Tık tuzağı
• Gazetecilik
• İnternet gazeteciliği
• Algoritmalar

References

1. Apresjan, V., & Orlov, A. (2022). Pragmatic mechanisms of manipulation in Russian online media: How clickbait works (or does not). Journal of Pragmatics, (195), 91–108.
2. Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2017). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175.
3. BBC. (2025, March 19). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/52847648
4. Bilić, P. (2018). A critique of the political economy of algorithms: A brief history of Google’s technological rationality. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(1), 315–331.
5. Bird, S. E. (2009). Tabloidization: What is it, and does it really matter? In B. Zelizer (Ed.), The changing faces of journalism: Tabloidization, technology and truthiness (pp. 50–60). Routledge.
6. Blessing, L. T., Chakrabarti, A., & Wallace, K. M. (1998). An overview of descriptive studies in relation to a general design research methodology. In Designers: The key to successful product development (pp. 42–56). Springer.
7. Boukes, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2014). Soft news with hard consequences? Introducing a nuanced measure of soft versus hard news exposure and its relationship with political cynicism. Communication Research, 42(5), 701–731.
8. Chagas, V. (2016). Political economy of popular journalism on comparative perspective: An analysis on tabloidization in Brazil, India and South Africa. Brazilian Journalism Research, 12(1), 58–77.

9. Cho, J., Ahmed, A., Hilbert, M., Liu, B., & Luu, J. (2020). Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 150–172.
10. CMSWIRE. (2025, March 15). Retrieved from https://www.cmswire.com/digital-marketing/state-of-seo-google-search-algorithm-updates/
11. CNBC. (2025a, March 18). Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/30/read-all-about-it-the-biggest-fake-news-stories-of-2016.html
12. CNBC. (2025b, March 18). Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/30/read-all-about-it-the-biggest-fake-news-stories-of-2016.html
13. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2018). The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.
14. Digital Collections. (2025a, March 2). Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/img16251?_ga=2.8470837.1203198758.1743272928-711587805.1742848069
15. Digital Collections. (2025b, March 3). Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/img16312
16. Esser, F. (1999). Tabloidization of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324.
17. Fakhruroji, M., Suryana, C., & Wahyudin, A. (2023). Clickbait journalism: Media logics in journalism practices on online media. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 229–244.
18. Gazete Duvar. (2025a, March 16). Retrieved from https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/gazete-duvara-veda-makale-1763424
19. Gazete Duvar. (2025b, March 16). Retrieved from https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/kamuoyuna-acik-mektup-googlein-yikici-ambargosunu-protesto-ediyoruz-haber-1763452
20. Guardian. (2025, March 18). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/17/covid-misinformation-conspiracy-theories-ccdh-report
21. Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Burst of the filter bubble? Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343.
22. Hanusch, F. (2013). Broadening the focus: The case for lifestyle journalism as a field of scholarly inquiry. In F. Hanusch (Ed.), Lifestyle journalism (pp. 1–10). Routledge.
23. Levy, R. (2021). Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Review, 111(3), 831–870.
24. Library of Congress. (2025, March 6). Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/img16312
25. McNair, B. (2003). News and journalism in the UK. Routledge.
26. McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). Routledge.
27. Milliyet. (2025, March 20). Retrieved from https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/firlayan-rogar-kapagi-kapiyi-kirdi-yolcunun-metrobusten-dustugu-anlar-arac-ici-kamerasinda-7250200
28. Nam, S. (2024). Who gets paid (for) what? The cultural political economy of news content in generative AI. Emerging Media, 2(3), 397–421.
29. Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340–360.
30. Napoli, P. M. (2019). Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University.
31. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
32. Posta. (2025, March 14). Retrieved from https://www.posta.com.tr/galeri/kasik-kasik-yiyince-bagirsaklari-motor-gibi-calistiriyor-tikali-bagirsaklari-yag-cozucu-gibi-acip-kabizligi-bitiriyor-siskinligin-ko-2841888/1
33. PressGazette. (2025, March 15). Retrieved from https://pressgazette.co.uk/media-audience-and-business-data/first-google-core-update-of-2024-brings-bad-news-for-most-news-publishers/
34. Rahman, H. U. (2023). Media ethics in the era of clickbait journalism: Ethical dilemmas and solutions in online media. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 11–20.
35. Rowe, D. (2010). Tabloidization: Form, style and socio-cultural change. In V. Rupar (Ed.), Journalism and meaning-making: Reading the newspaper (pp. 146–169). Hampton.
36. Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11(3), 263–282.
37. Search Engine Roundtable. (2025, March 15). Retrieved from https://www.seroundtable.com/google-august-2024-core-update-impact-poll-results-37989.html
38. Shiang, L., & Wilson, S. (2024). Unravelling clickbait news as viral journalism in Malaysia: Its phenomenon and impacts. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, (16), 33–47.
39. Sistrix. (2025, March 15). Retrieved from https://www.sistrix.com/blog/indexwatch-q2-2024
40. Teyit. (2025a, March 19). Retrieved from https://teyit.org/analiz/fotografin-seine-nehri-uzerinde-eylem-yapan-sari-yeleklileri-gosterdigi-iddiasi
41. Teyit. (2025b, March 20). Retrieved from https://teyit.org/analiz/rus-kozmonotlarin-ukraynaya-destek-icin-sari-giysiler-giydigi-iddiasi
42. The Sun. (2025, March 7). Retrieved from https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/9805298/princess-diana-remembered-in-sun-historic-front-pages-22-years-on-from-death/
43. Thorson, K., Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., & Pak, C. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200.
44. Qorib, F., Oktarina, R. A., Mardiana, S., & Wulandari, E. R. (2024). Clickbait in the era of information technology: Evaluating engagement strategies and ethical journalism in online media. In Seventh International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE) (pp. 204–209). IEEE.
45. Wolfowicz, M., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2023). Examining the interactive effects of the filter bubble and the echo chamber on radicalization. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 119–141.