FİLMLERDE ÜLKE İMAJI: “HOLOGRAM FOR THE KING” FİLMİ ÜZERİNE BIR İNCELEME

Year 2019, , 216 - 231, 30.01.2019

Duygu Dersan Orhan , Elif Eşiyok

https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.458888

Abstract

Film ülkelere ilişkin imajları yaymak için kullanılan araçlardan birisidir. Bugüne kadar yapılan araştırmalar, Hollywood filmlerinde Arap imajının olumsuz tasvir edildiğine dair genel bir anlayışı ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak, “Kral için Hologram” filmi Suudi Arabistan’ının ve halkının hem olumsuz hem de olumlu yönlerine odaklanarak daha gerçekçi ve daha az önyargılı bir yaklaşım sergilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Suudi Arabistan ve halkının bir Hollywood filmi olan “Kral için Hologram” filmindeki temsilini incelemektir. Çalışmada içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları, filmdeki ülke imajına ilişkin görsellerin toplam süresinin 28.9 dakika olduğunu göstermiştir. Ülkenin politik ve sosyal niteliği ve ülkenin kapasitesi / yeterliğine ilişkin imajlar en yüksek yüzdeye sahip olarak bulunmuştur. Bu sonuç filmlerin ülke imajı için önemli bir iletişim aracı olduğunu göstermektedir

Keywords

Ülke imajı, Suudi Arabistan, film, temsil, iletişim

COUNTRY IMAGE IN MOVIES: A STUDY ON “HOLOGRAM FOR THE KING” MOVIE

Abstract

Movies are generally used as a tool for disseminating country’s image. In the relevant literature, there is a general understanding that the Arabs are dehumanized and depicted in negative ways in the Hollywood movies. However, “Hologram for the King” has a more realistic and less biased approach with its focus on both the negative and the positive aspects of Saudi Arabia and its people. The aim of this study, is to analyze the representation of Saudi Arabia and its people in the Hollywood movie “Hologram for the King”. Content analysis method is used for the analysis. The findings of the study indicated that, the total duration of the country image in the movie is 28.9 minutes. Political and social character of the country and capacities/competencies of the country were found to have the highest percentage. This result, reflects that movies are and important tool of communication for the country image.

Keywords

Country image, Saudi Arabia, movie, representation, communication

References

• Alison T (2004) The public relations handbook. NY: Routledge. Ayvazyan L (2010) The Country Image and International Relations: 21st Century Environment, 21th Century: Information and Analytical Journal, 1 (7), 36-51. Beeton S (2016) Film-induced tourism. UK: Channel view publications.Boulding K E (1956) The image: Knowledge in life and society. Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Boulding K E (1959) National Images and International Systems, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, (3), 120-131.Caruso J (2008) Film Review: Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People, International Journal of Multicultural Education, 10 (2), 1-7. El-Farra N (1996) Arabs and the media, Journal of Media Psychology 1 (2), 1-7.Ghareeb E (1983) Split Vision: The Portrayal of Arabs in the American Media, Washington DC: Arab-American Affairs Council. Herrmann R K F, Voss J, Schooler T Y E and Ciarrochi J (1997) Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata, International Studies Quarterly, (41), 403–433. Holsti, Ole R (1962) The Belief System and National Images: A case Study, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6 (3), 244-252. Holsti, Ole R (1968) Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy in J.C. Farre and A.P.Smith, (Eds.), Image and Reality in World Politics, New York, London: Colombia University Press.Jervis R (1970) The Logic of Images in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Khatib L (2006) Filming the modern Middle East: Politics in the cinemas of Hollywood and the Arab world, 57. New York: IB Tauris.Kozlovic A K (2007) Islams, Muslims and Arabs in the Popular Hollywood Cinema, Comparative Islamic Studies, 3(2), 213-246. Kunczik M (2016) Images of nations and international public relations. New York: Routledge.Kunczik M (1997) Images of Nations and International Public Relations, Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Laroche M, Papadopoulos N, Heslop L A H and Mourali M (2005) The influence of country image structure on consumer evaluations of foreign products. International Marketing Review, 22(1), 96-115.Li X and Naren C (2009) Reframing national image: A methodological framework, Conflict & Communication Online, 8 (2), 1-11. Hurwitz J and Mark P (1990) Public Images of the Soviet Union: The Impact on Foreign Policy Attitudes, The Journal of Politics, 52 (1).Rosati J A (1987) The Carter Administration's Quest for Global Community: Beliefs and Their Impact on Behavior, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Ryan M and Douglas K (1990) Camera politica: The politics and ideology of contemporary Hollywood film ,604, Indiana University Press.Shaheen J G (2001) Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People, Northampton, Mass.: Interlink Publishing Group. Shaheen J G (2003) Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Villifies a People, Annals, AAPSS. Shaheen J G (2008) Guilty: Hollywood's Verdict on Arabs after 9/11, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press. Sharabi H (1979) The Arab Image in Western Media, The 1979 International Press Seminar, London: Howard Jones Associate. Vidal G (1993) Screening History, London: Abacus. Wang J (2006) Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 91-96.Wright Q (1957) Design for a Research Project on International Conflict and the Factors Causing thier Aggravation or Amelioration, Western Political Quarterly, (10), 263-75.