Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Görsel İletişim Aracı Olarak İnfografiklerin Öğrenme Süreçlerinde Kullanımı: Dijital Yerliler İçin Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve

Year 2021, , 432 - 461, 15.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.776543

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, dijital yerlilerin öğrenme süreçlerinde infografiklerin nasıl kullanılabileceğine ilişkin önerilerin sunulduğu kuramsal bir çerçevenin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, dijital yerlilerin öğrenme süreçlerinde infografiklerin nasıl kullanılabileceği sorusu, araştırmanın ana sorusu olarak belirlenmiştir. Nitel bir bakış açısıyla desenlenen bu araştırmada, araştırma modeli olarak döküman incelemesi yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, ulusal ve uluslararası alanyazın taraması yapılarak ulaşılan tema ve ana temalardan dijital yerlilerin öğrenme süreçlerinde infografiklerin kullanımına ilişkin kuramsal bir çerçeve geliştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında sunulan kuramsal çerçevenin dayanağını Tapscott (2009) tarafından tanımlanan dijital yerlilerin özellikleri ile Smiciklas (2012) tarafından infografik kavramının üstün yönlerini ifade etmede kullanılan ilkeler oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, araştırma kapsamında geliştirilen kuramsal çerçevenin, dijital yerliler ve infografik konularında araştırma yapmak isteyen kurum/kuruluşlara, araştırmacılara ve öğrenenlere yol gösterici nitelikte olduğu söylenebilir. Buna ek olarak, gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalar için benzer konunun farklı teknolojilerle ve farklı gruplarla geniş kapsamda çalışılması, araştırma kapsamında sunulan kuramsal çerçevenin geliştirilerek uygulamaya dayalı bir araştırmaya dönüştürülmesi araştırmanın önerileri arasında yer almaktadır.

References

  • Alrwele, N. S. (2017). Effects of infographics on student achievement and students' perceptions of the impacts of infographics. Journal of Education and Human Development , 6 (3), 104-117.
  • Bennett, S., Maton, K. A., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology , 39 (5), 775-786.
  • Buckingham, D. (2011). Foreword. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Hershey: PA: Sage Publications.
  • Çaka, C. (2018). Farklı infografik tasarımlarının öğrenme çıktılarına, bilişsel yüke ve motivasyona etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Dingli, A., & Seychell, D. (2015). The new digital natives cutting the chord. Berlin: Springer.
  • Dyjur, P., & Li, L. (2015). Learning 21st century skills by engaging in an infographics assignment. B. Preciado, Takeuchi, & Lock içinde, IDEAS: Designing Responsive Pedagogy (s. 62-71). Werklund School of the Education, University of Calgary.
  • Halloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring childrens’s identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. annals of the Association of American Geographers , 92 (2), 302-319.
  • Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal , 36 (3), 503-520.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: the next generations. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Jones, C. (2011). Students the net generation, and digital natives: accounting for educational change. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 30-48). New York: Routledge.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Bruyckere, P. D. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education , 67 (2017), 135-142.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Merrie ̈nboer, J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist , 67 (2017), 169-183.
  • Krum, R. (2014). Cool infographics: effective communication with data visualization and design. Indiana: Wiley.
  • Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2014). Infographics part 1: Invitations to Inquiry. Teacher Librarian , 15 (2), 54-58.
  • Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2012). Modelling digital natives’ international collaboration: Finnish-Korean experiences of environmental education. Educational Technology & Society , 15 (2), 244-256.
  • Levy, R. (2011). Young children, digital technology, and interaction with text. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 151-166). New York: Routledge.
  • Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education , 56 (2011), 429-440.
  • Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives didgital literacy? Computers & Education , 59 (2012), 1065-1078.
  • Nuhoğlu-Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2018). Ortaokul düzeyinde öğrenme stratejisi olarak infografik oluşturma sürecinin eğitsel tasarım araştırması yöntemiyle modellenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim , 43 (196), 97-123.
  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: understanding the first generation of the digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
  • Pazilah, F. N., & Hashim, H. (2018). Using infographics as a technology-based tool to develop 21st century skills in an ESL context. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies , 1 (1), 35-38.
  • Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon , 9 (5), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon , 9 (6), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M. (2011). Gidital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 15-29). New York: Routledge.
  • Smiciklas, M. (2012). The powerof ınfographics: using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Indiana: Que.
  • Smith, E. E. (2012). The digital native debate in higher education: a comparative analysis of literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology , 38 (3), 1-18.
  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Thomas, M. (2011). Technology, education, and the discourse of the digital native: between evangelists and dissenters. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
  • Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education , 65 (2013), 12-33.
  • Williams, D. L., Crittenden, V. L., Keo, T., & McCarty, P. (2012). The use of social media: an exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs , 12 (2), 127-136.
  • Yıldırım, Y. S., & Perdahçı, Z. N. (2019). Eğitimde interaktif infografik kullanımının öğrenci başarı, tutum ve motivasyonuna etkisi. The turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC , 9 (3), 449-463.
  • Yuvaraj, M. (2017). Infographics: tools for designing, visualizing data and storytelling in libraries. Library Hi Tech News , 5, 6-9.
Year 2021, , 432 - 461, 15.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.776543

Abstract

References

  • Alrwele, N. S. (2017). Effects of infographics on student achievement and students' perceptions of the impacts of infographics. Journal of Education and Human Development , 6 (3), 104-117.
  • Bennett, S., Maton, K. A., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology , 39 (5), 775-786.
  • Buckingham, D. (2011). Foreword. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Hershey: PA: Sage Publications.
  • Çaka, C. (2018). Farklı infografik tasarımlarının öğrenme çıktılarına, bilişsel yüke ve motivasyona etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Dingli, A., & Seychell, D. (2015). The new digital natives cutting the chord. Berlin: Springer.
  • Dyjur, P., & Li, L. (2015). Learning 21st century skills by engaging in an infographics assignment. B. Preciado, Takeuchi, & Lock içinde, IDEAS: Designing Responsive Pedagogy (s. 62-71). Werklund School of the Education, University of Calgary.
  • Halloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring childrens’s identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. annals of the Association of American Geographers , 92 (2), 302-319.
  • Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal , 36 (3), 503-520.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: the next generations. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Jones, C. (2011). Students the net generation, and digital natives: accounting for educational change. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 30-48). New York: Routledge.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Bruyckere, P. D. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education , 67 (2017), 135-142.
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Merrie ̈nboer, J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist , 67 (2017), 169-183.
  • Krum, R. (2014). Cool infographics: effective communication with data visualization and design. Indiana: Wiley.
  • Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2014). Infographics part 1: Invitations to Inquiry. Teacher Librarian , 15 (2), 54-58.
  • Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2012). Modelling digital natives’ international collaboration: Finnish-Korean experiences of environmental education. Educational Technology & Society , 15 (2), 244-256.
  • Levy, R. (2011). Young children, digital technology, and interaction with text. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 151-166). New York: Routledge.
  • Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education , 56 (2011), 429-440.
  • Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives didgital literacy? Computers & Education , 59 (2012), 1065-1078.
  • Nuhoğlu-Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2018). Ortaokul düzeyinde öğrenme stratejisi olarak infografik oluşturma sürecinin eğitsel tasarım araştırması yöntemiyle modellenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim , 43 (196), 97-123.
  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: understanding the first generation of the digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
  • Pazilah, F. N., & Hashim, H. (2018). Using infographics as a technology-based tool to develop 21st century skills in an ESL context. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies , 1 (1), 35-38.
  • Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon , 9 (5), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon , 9 (6), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M. (2011). Gidital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 15-29). New York: Routledge.
  • Smiciklas, M. (2012). The powerof ınfographics: using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Indiana: Que.
  • Smith, E. E. (2012). The digital native debate in higher education: a comparative analysis of literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology , 38 (3), 1-18.
  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Thomas, M. (2011). Technology, education, and the discourse of the digital native: between evangelists and dissenters. M. Thomas içinde, Deconstructing digital natives: young people, technology and the new literacies (s. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
  • Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education , 65 (2013), 12-33.
  • Williams, D. L., Crittenden, V. L., Keo, T., & McCarty, P. (2012). The use of social media: an exploratory study of usage among digital natives. Journal of Public Affairs , 12 (2), 127-136.
  • Yıldırım, Y. S., & Perdahçı, Z. N. (2019). Eğitimde interaktif infografik kullanımının öğrenci başarı, tutum ve motivasyonuna etkisi. The turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC , 9 (3), 449-463.
  • Yuvaraj, M. (2017). Infographics: tools for designing, visualizing data and storytelling in libraries. Library Hi Tech News , 5, 6-9.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Compilation Articles
Authors

Tülay Görü Doğan 0000-0002-9442-8926

T. Volkan Yüzer 0000-0002-8316-6115

Publication Date January 15, 2021
Submission Date August 2, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Görü Doğan, T., & Yüzer, T. V. (2021). Görsel İletişim Aracı Olarak İnfografiklerin Öğrenme Süreçlerinde Kullanımı: Dijital Yerliler İçin Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve. Selçuk İletişim, 14(1), 432-461. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.776543