Yaş Mevye ve Sebze Tüketicilerinin Gıda Güvenliği Algıları

Year 2018, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 36 - 44, 15.05.2018

Özge Can Niyaz , Nevin Demirbaş

Abstract

Özet

                   
Bu çalışmanın amacı Çanakkale’deki yaş
meyve ve sebze tüketicilerinin, yaş meyve ve sebzelerdeki gıda güvenliği
algılarının ölçülmesidir. Oransal Örnekleme Formülü ile belirlenen 166 tüketici
ile yüz yüze anketler yapılmıştır. Tüketicilerin algılarının ölçülmesi için
5’li Likert Ölçekli yargılardan, algı boyutlarının ölçülmesi için ise Çok
Boyutlu Ölçekleme Analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre;
tüketiciler yaş meyve ve sebzelerin hormone, pestisit, gübre kalıntısı
içerdiğini ve Genetiği Değiştirilmiş Organizmalar kullanıldığını düşünmektedir.
Dahası, tüketicilerin yaş meyve ve sebzelerde gıda güvenliği ile ilgili ortak
ve farklı algıları da çalışmada ele alınmıştır. Gıda güvenliği ile ilgili
tespit edilen sorunlara devlet, üretici, tüketici ve araştırmacılar açısından
öneriler getirilmiştir.

Keywords

Tüketici algısı, gıda güvenliği, yaş meyve, yaş sebze

Food Safety Perceptions of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Consumers

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the perceptions regarding
food safety of the fresh fruits and vegetables consumers in Canakkale. Face to
face interviews were carried out with 166 consumers who were determined via proportional
sampling method. A Five-Point Likert Scale was used to define the perceptions consumer
and Multidimensional Scaling Analysis was used for determining the perception
dimensions. As a result of study; consumers are of the opinion that fresh
fruits and vegetables include hormones, pesticides, fertilizer remains and
Genetically Modified Organisms. Further, common and different perceptions of
consumers were determined about food safety for fresh fruits and vegetables in
the study. Suggestions related to problems on food safety have also been
evaluated in the study for government, farmers, consumers, researchers.

Keywords

Consumer perceptions, food safety, fresh fruits, fresh vegetables

References

• Allen, I. E. and C. A. Seaman. 2007. Likert Scales and Data Analysis. Quality Process 40(7):64-65.
• Badrie, N., A. Gobin, S. Dookeran, and R. Duncan, 2006. Consumer awareness and perception to food safety hazards in Trinidad, West Indies. Food Control 17(1):370-377.
• Baker, G. A. 1999. Consumer preferences for food safety attributes in fresh apples: market segments, consumer characteristics and marketing opportunities. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 24(1):80-97.
• Bal, H. S., Z. G. Göktolga, ve O. Karkacıer. 2006. Gıda güvenliği konusunda tüketici bilincinin incelenmesi: Tokat İli Örneği. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi 12(1): 9-18.
• Berdegue, J.A., F. Balsevich, L. Flores and T. Reradon. 2005. Central American supermarkets’ private standards of quality and safety in procurement of fresh fruits and vegetables. Food Policy 30(3): 254-269.
• Bond, J. K., D. Thilmany, and C. Bond. 2009. What influences consumer choice of fresh produce purchase location?. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41(1): 61-74.
• Borg, I. and P. J. F. Groenen. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
• Costell, E., A. Tarrega and S. Bayarri. 2010. Food acceptance: the role of consumer perception and attitudes. Chemosensory Perception 3(1):42-50. Cox, T. F. and M. A. A. Cox. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Ergönül, B. 2013. Consumer awarness and perception to food safety: a consumer analysis. Food Control 32(2):461-471.
• European Commision (EC). 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/ (accessed 16 March 2017).
• European Statistics (EUROSTAT). 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed 26 February 2015).
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO). 2003. Codex Alimentarius, Italy.
• FAO. 2004. The Role of Post Harvest Managment in Assuring the Quality and Safety of Horticultural Produce. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin, No:152, Rome/Italy.
• Fillion, L. and D. Kilcast, 2002. Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Quality and Preferences, 13(1):23-29.
• Greenpeace. 2015. Europe’s Pesticide Addiction: How Industrial Agriculture Damages Our Environment. Greenpeace Scientific Report.
• http://m.greenpeace.org/austria/Global/austria/dokumente/Reports/Landwirtschaft/Landwirtschaft_Europes_Pesticide_Addiction_201510.pdf (accessed 16 March 2017).
• Grunert, K. G. 2005. Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(3):369-391.
• Gündüz, S. 2011. Uzaklık fonksiyonlarının çok boyutlu ölçekleme algoritmalarındaki etkinliğinin incelenmesi ve uygulamalar. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü İstatistik Bölümü. Master Tezi, Adana/Türkiye.
• Hacettepe University (HU). 2015. Sebze ve meyve grubu; Türkiye’ye özgü besin ve beslenme rehberi. Ankara: Merdiven Tanıtım ve Reklam.
• Harker, F. R., A. F. Gunson, and S. R. Jaeger, 2003. The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 28(3):333-347.
• Harper, G. C. and A. Makatouni, 2002. Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal 104(3/4/5): 287-299.
• Hoefkens, C., W. Verbeke, J. Aertsens, K. Mondelaers and V. J. Camp. 2009. The nutritional and toxicological value of organic vegetables: consumer perception versus scientific evidence. British Food Journal 111(10):1062-1077.
• Imram, N. 1999. The role of visual cues in consumer perception and acceptance of a food product. Nutrition and Food Science 99(5): 224-230.
• Kalaycı, Ö. 2010. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın.
• Kays, S. J. 1999. Preharvest factors affecting appearance. Proharvest Biology and Technology 15 (3): 233-247.
• Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29(1):115–129.
• Liao, P. A., H. H. Chang, and C. Y. Chang. 2011. Why is the food traceability system unsuccessful in Taiwan? Empirical evidence from a national survey of fruit and vegetable farmers. Food Policy 36:686-693.
• Lobb, A. E., M. Mazzocchi and W. B. Traill. 2007. Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Quality and Preference 18(1):384-395.
• Naspetti, S. and Z. Rafaele, 2009. Organic food quality and safety perception throughout Europe. Journal of Food Products Marketing 15(3):249-266.
• Onurlubaş, E. ve A. Z. Gürler, 2016. Gıda güvenliği konusunda tüketicilerin bilinç düzeyini etkileyen faktörler. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 33(1):132-141.
• Oraman, Y. and G. Unakıtan, 2010. Analysis of Factors Influencing Organic Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing in Istanbul, Turkey. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 49(6):452-466.
• Özdamar, K. 2013. Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir:Nisan Kitap Evi.
• Peneau, S., E. Hoehn. H. R. Roth, F. Escher and J. Nuessli. 2006. Importance and consumer perception of freshness of apples. Food Quality and Preference 17(1/2):9-19.
• Peneau, S., A. Linke, F. Escher and J. Nuessli. 2009. Freshness of fruits and vegetables: consumer language and perception. British Food Journal 111(3):243-256.
• Ragaert, P., W. Verbeke, F. Devlieghere and J. Debevere, 2004. Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Quality and Preference 15(1): 259-270.
• Redmond, E. C. and C. Griffith, 2004. Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility. Appetite 43(3):309-313.
• Resnicow, K., A. Jackson, T. Wang, K. A. De, F. McCarty, W. N. Dudley, and T. Baranowski. 2001. A Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake Through Black Churches: Results of the Eat for Life Trial. American Journal of Public Health 91(10): 1686-1693.
• Rico, D., A. B. Diana-Martin, J. M. Barat, and C. Barry-Ryan. 2007. Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 18(7): 373-386.
• Rijswijk, W. V. and L. J. Frewer, 2008. Consumer perceptions of food quality and safety and their relation to traceability. British Food Journal 110(10):1034-1046.
• Rimal, A., M. F. Stanley, K. H. McWatters, S. K. Misra, and S. Deodhar. 2001. Perception of food safety and changes in food consumption habits: a consumer analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies 25(1):43-52.
• Rodriguez-Lazaro, D., B. Lombard, H. Smith, A. Rzezutka, M. D’Agostino, R. Helmuth, and A. Schoeter, et al., 2007. Trends in analytical methodology in food safety and quality: monitoring microorganisms and genetically modified organisms. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 18(6): 306-319.
• Roitner-Schobesberger, B. R., I. Darnhofer, S. Somsook, and C. R. Vogl. 2008. Consumer perceptions of organic foods in Bangkok, Thailand. Food Policy 33(1):112-121.
• Röhr, A., K. Lüddecke, S., Drusch, M. J., Müller, and R. V. Alvensleben. 2005. Food quality and safety–consumer perception and public health concern. Food Control 16(1):649-655.
• Safefood. 2007. A Review of the Fruit and Vegetable Food Chain: Consumer Focused Review of The Fruit and Vegetable Food Chain. February 2007.
• Schifferstein, H. N. J. and M. P. H. D. Cleiren. 2005. Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica 118(1):293-318.
• Smith, D., and P. Reitmuller, 1999. Consumer concerns about food safety in Australia and Japan. International Journal of Consumer Economics 26(6):724-743.
• Türkiye Gelişim Merkezi Platformu (TUGEM), (2016), ‘‘Fasıl 12-Yağlı tohum ve meyveler; muhtelif tane, tohum ve meyveler; sanayide ve tıpta kullanılan bitkiler; saman ve kaba yem’’, available at: https://www.tugem.com.tr/component/mevzuatlar/?mlid=1888 (accessed 10 August 2016).
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI), (2015), available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr (accessed 23 July 2015).
• University of Maryland (UM). 2010. Improving the safety and quality of fresh fruits and vegetables: a training manual for trainers. FDA Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Maryland/USA.
• Unusan, N. 2007. Consumer food safety knowledge and practices in the home in Turkey. Food Control 18(1):45-51.
• Vabo, M. and Hansen, H. 2014.The relationship between food preferences and food choice: a theoretical discussion. International Journal of Business and Social Science 5(7):145-157.
• Whitehead, R. D., G. Özakıncı, I. D. Stephen, and D. I. Perret, D. I. 2012. Appealing to vanity: could potential appearance improvment motivate fruit and vegetable consumption?, American Journal of Public Health 102(2):207-211.
• Wilcock, A., M. Pun, J. Khanona, and M. Aung, 2004. Consumer attitudes, knowledge and behaviour; a review of food safety issues. Trends in Food Science and Technology 15(2):56-66.
• Yahaya I., F. A. Yamoah and F. Adams F. 2015. Consumer motivation and willingness to pay for safer vegetable in Ghana. British Food Journal 117(3):1043-1065. Yeung, R. M. W. and J. Morris. 2001. Food safety risk: consumer perception and purchase behaviour. British Food Journal 103(3):170-187.
• Yılmaz, H., V. Demircan, and M. Gül. 2010. Examing of chemical fertilizer use levels in terms of agricultural environment relations and economic losses in the agricultural farms: the case of Isparta, Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 16(2):143-157.