Bilimsel Araştırmalarda P-Hacking: Bilimsel Sonuçların Güvenilirliği Tehlikede mi?

Abstract

Editöre Mektup: P-Hacking in Scientific Research: Is the Reliability of Scientific Results at Risk?

P-Hacking in Scientific Research: Is the Reliability of Scientific Results at Risk?

Abstract

Letter to the Editor: P-Hacking in Scientific Research: Is the Reliability of Scientific Results at Risk?

References

1. [1] J. P. Simmons, L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn, "False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant," Psychol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1359–1366, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632.
2. [2] M. L. Head, L. Holman, R. Lanfear, A. T. Kahn, and M. D. Jennions, "The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science," PLoS Biol., vol. 13, no. 3, p. e1002106, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106.
3. [3] D. J. Benjamin et al., "Redefine statistical significance," Nat. Hum. Behav. vol. 2, pp. 6–10, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
4. [4] J. M. Wicherts, M. Bakker, and D. Molenaar, "Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results," PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e26828, 2011, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026828.
5. [5] B. A. Nosek, C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor, "The preregistration revolution," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 2600–2606, 2018, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.