Türkiye'deki Yenilenebilir Enerji Şirketlerinin Vizyon ve Misyon Bildirgelerinin Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları ile Uyum Analizi

Year 2025, Issue: 12, 89 - 99, 31.12.2025

Meri Taksi Deveciyan , Sude Tosun

https://doi.org/10.52693/jsas.1822122

Abstract

Enerji, ekonomik büyümenin temel unsurlarından biridir. Artan enerji talebi ve fosil yakıtların çevresel etkileri, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına yönelimi zorunlu kılmaktadır. Türkiye’nin yüksek yenilenebilir enerji potansiyeli, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve enerji bağımsızlığı açısından stratejik bir fırsat sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, enerji şirketlerinin vizyon ve misyon bildirgeleri yalnızca kurumsal yönelimleri değil, aynı zamanda çevresel sürdürülebilirlik stratejilerini de yansıtmalıdır. Bu çalışma, MW100 Türkiye listesine göre kurulum gücü en yüksek ilk 10 yenilenebilir enerji şirketinin vizyon ve misyon bildirgelerinin Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları (SKA) ile uyumunu incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Nitel araştırma yöntemi kapsamında, ölçüt örnekleme ile belirlenen şirketlerin bildirgeleri, betimsel içerik analizi yöntemiyle temalar altında değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan araştırma sonucunda, Erişilebilir ve Temiz Enerji başlığının en fazla vurgulanan sürdülebilir kalkınma amacı olduğu, Misyon ve vizyon bildirgelerinde en çok tekrar edilen ifadelerin ise "Temiz enerji", "yenilenebilir enerji", "sürdürülebilirlik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca Türkiye'deki yenilenebilir enerji şirketlerinin stratejik niyetlerinde çevresel duyarlılık, sürdürülebilirlik ve liderlik gibi temaların benzerlik gösterdiği izlenmektedir. Şirketlerin büyük çoğunluğu çevreye duyarlı üretimi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı önceliklendirirken, sosyal etki ve insan kaynağına yönelik ifadeler daha sınırlı düzeyde görülmektedir.

Keywords

yenilenebilir enerji , sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları , vizyon , misyon

Ethical Statement

Çalışmada ikincil veri kullanılmış olduğundan etik kurul raporu gerektirmemektedir.

Supporting Institution

Tübitak 2209-A kapsamında desteklenmeye hak kazanmış olan projeden türetilmiştir.

Project Number

----

Compliance Analysis of the Vision and Mission Statements of Renewable Energy Companies in Türkiye with Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Energy is a fundamental driver of economic growth. Increasing energy demand and the environmental impacts of fossil fuels necessitate a shift toward renewable energy sources. Türkiye's high renewable energy potential presents a strategic opportunity for sustainable development and energy independence. In this context, the vision and mission statements of energy companies should reflect not only their corporate orientations but also their environmental sustainability strategies. This study aims to examine the alignment of the vision and mission statements of the top 10 renewable energy companies with the highest installed capacity, according to the MW100 Türkiye list, with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Within the scope of the qualitative research method, the statements of the companies selected through criterion sampling were evaluated under themes using descriptive content analysis. The research found that "Accessible and Clean Energy" was the most emphasized sustainable development goal, while the most frequently repeated phrases in mission and vision statements were "Clean energy," "Renewable energy," and "Sustainability." Furthermore, it was observed that the strategic intentions of renewable energy companies in Türkiye are similar to themes such as environmental awareness, sustainability, and leadership. While the vast majority of companies prioritize environmentally friendly production and sustainable development, statements regarding social impact and human resources are more limited.

Keywords

renewable energy , sustainable development goals , vision , mission

Project Number

----

References

• [1] R. M. Elavarasan, “The motivation for renewable energy and its comparison with other energy sources: A review,” European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, vol. 3, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.20897/ejosdr/4005.
• [2] G. E. Halkos, “Reviewing usage, potentials, and limitations of renewables, their connection to climate change, economic growth and human health,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2906, 2020.
• [3] S. Özden, B. İnan, and D. Balkanlı, “Towards a greener Türkiye: Renewable energy perspectives and future directions,” ASRJETS Journal, 2025.
• [4] P. Ray, “Renewable energy and sustainability: Perspectives from long-term analysis,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1517–1533, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10098-019-01739-4.
• [5] M. A. Yülek, The Chief Sustainability Officer: Institutionalizing Sustainability to Achieve the SDGs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01319-1.
• [6] J. F. Mitchell, T. C. Johns, J. M. Gregory, and S. F. B. Tett, “Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols,” Nature, vol. 376, no. 6540, pp. 501–504, 1995.
• [7] M. A. Palmer, R. F. Ambrose, and N. L. Poff, “Ecological theory and community restoration ecology,” Restoration Ecology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 291–300, 1997.
• [8] R. Fuller, Renewable Energy and Sustainability: An Evaluation, 2005.
• [9] R. Lin and J. Ren, “Renewable energy and sustainable development,” Journal of Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2020.
• [10] M. Yu and R. Zhao, “Sustainability and firm valuation: An international investigation,” International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, vol. 23, pp. 289–307, 2015.
• [11] S. Garrido, T. Sequeira, and M. Santos, “Renewable energy and sustainability from the supply side: A critical review and analysis,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 17, p. 5755, 2020.
• [12] S. D. Cîrstea, C. Moldovan-Teselios, A. Cîrstea, A. C. Turcu, and C. P. Darab, “Evaluating renewable energy sustainability by composite index,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 811, 2018.
• [13] I. M. Bugaje, “Renewable energy for sustainable development in Africa: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 603–612, 2006.
• [14] T. Cernev and R. Fenner, “The importance of achieving foundational sustainable development goals in reducing global risk,” Futures, vol. 115, p. 102492, 2020.
• [15] J. A. Pearce and F. David, “Corporate mission statements: The bottom line,” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 1987.
• [16] N. Baral and M. P. Pokharel, “How sustainability is reflected in the S&P 500 companies’ strategic documents,” Organization & Environment, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 122–141, 2017.
• [17] C. Bedoya-Dorado, G. Murillo-Vargas, and C. H. Gonzalez-Campo, “Sustainability in the mission and vision statements of Colombian universities,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 67–86, 2022.
• [18] S. T. Garnett et al., “Portrayal of sustainability principles in the mission statements and on home pages of the world’s largest organizations,” Conservation Biology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 297–307, 2016.
• [19] F. Alshameri and N. Green, “Analyzing the strength between mission and vision statements and industry via machine learning,” Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 36, no. 3, 2020.
• [20] T. K. Molchanova, N. N. Yashalova, and D. A. Ruban, “Environmental concerns of Russian businesses: Top company missions and climate change agenda,” Climate, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 56, 2020.
• [21] U. Yozgat and N. Karataş, “Going green of mission and vision statements: Ethical, social, and environmental concerns across organizations,” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 1359–1366, 2011.
• [22] D. A. Ruban, N. N. Yashalova, and V. A. Ermolaev, “Is environment a strategic priority of the leading energy companies? Evidence from mission statements,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 2192, 2021.
• [23] Ş. Muslu, “Örgütlerde misyon ve vizyon kavramlarının önemi,” Hak-İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 150–171, 2014.
• [24] R. Indradewa and M. A. Iqbal, “Knowledge shifting process in energy sector company (Case study: PERTAMINA, an Indonesian energy company),” American International Journal of Business Management, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 8–17, 2021.
• [25] S. Kantabutra and G. C. Avery, “The power of vision: Statements that resonate,” Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2010.
• [26] M. T. Deveciyan, “Global ve yerel enerji şirketlerinin vizyon ifadelerinin incelenmesi,” Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 22, Özel Sayı, pp. 1619–1637, 2024.
• [27] A. Yıldırım and H. Şimşek, Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara, Türkiye: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2018.
• [28] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2013.
• [29] A. Labuschagne, “Qualitative research: Airy fairy or fundamental?” The Qualitative Report, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 100–103, 2003.
• [30] T. C. Lin, T. J. Lin, and C. C. Tsai, “Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1346–1372, 2014, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.864428.
• [31] Y. Us, T. Pimonenko, and O. Lyulyov, “Corporate social responsibility and renewable energy development for the green brand within SDGs: A meta-analytic review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 2335, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16052335.
• [32] H. C. Oliveira et al., “Integrating the SDGs into corporate strategy: A case study of EDP Group,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 253, 2025.
• [33] M. Yucel and S. Yucel, “Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dynamics in the energy sector: Strategic approaches for sustainable development,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 24, p. 6291, 2024.
• [34] D. Atstāja, “Renewable energy for sustainable development: Opportunities and current landscape,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 196, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18010196.