Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı Feltz, Chase, Moritz ve Sullivan
(1999) tarafından geliştirilen, Myers, Feltz, Chase, Reckase ve Hancock (2008)
tarafından güncellenen Antrenör Yeterlilik Ölçeği-II’nin, Türkçe uyarlama
çalışmasının yapılması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışma,
İzmir ilinde yer alan ve futbol takımlarında antrenörlük yapan 238 erkek
antrenör ile gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak Myers, Feltz, Chase, Reckase ve
Hankock (2008) tarafından güncellenen, 18 madde ve beş alt boyuttan oluşan
(motivasyon, oyun stratejileri, teknik öğretimi, karakter oluşumu, fiziksel
kondüsyon) Antrenör Yeterlilik Ölçeği-II kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen verilere,
%27’lik alt ve üst gruplar ortalama farklarına dayalı madde analizi,
doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmış, ölçeğin ve alt boyutlarının iç tutarlık
katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Verilerin analizlerinde SPSS 23.0 ve Lisrel 8.51
paket programları kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğe
uygulanan %27’lik alt ve üst gruplar ortalama farklarına dayalı madde analizi
sonuçlarında, ölçekte yer alan tüm maddelerin ayırt edicilik özelliklerinin
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<.01). Doğrulayıcı
faktör analizi sonuçlarından elde edilen değerler, verinin modele iyi uyum
gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur (χ2= 203.73, df =123, χ2/df = 1.66, RMSEA =
0.052, NNFI= 0.92, CFI=0.94, IFI=0.94, SRMR = 0.049, GFI=0.91, AGFI= 0.88).
Ölçeğin alt boyutları için iç tutarlılık katsayıları .64 ile .74 arasında
değişmektedir. Ölçeğin genel iç tutarlılık katsayısının ise .89 olduğu
belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak Antrenör Yeterlilik Ölçeği-II’nin futbol
antrenörleri üzerinde kullanılabilir geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı
olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Keywords
References
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
- Byrne, B. M.(1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309-334.
- Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(4), 328-354.
- Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in sports. In G. Tenenbaum &R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd. ed., pp. 111-135). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Feltz, D. L., Chase, M. A., Moritz, S. E. & Sullivan, P. J. (1999). A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 765-776.
- Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E. & Sullivan, P. J.(2008). Self-efficacy in Sport: Human Kinetics.
- Gençer, R. T., Kiremitci, O. & Boyacıoğlu, H. (2009). Antrenörlük yeterlilik ölçeği'nin (AYÖ) psikometrİk özellikleri: Türk antrenörler üzerine bir çalişma. Sport Sciences, 4(2), 143-153.
- Horn, T. S. (2002). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 309-354). Champaign,IL: Human Kinetics.
- Horn, T. S. (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 239-268). Champaign, IL: Human Knetics.
- Hoye, R., Smith, A., Westerbeek, H., Stewart, B. & Nicholson, M.(2006). Sport management : Principles and applications: Elsevier.
- Hu, L. t. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24.
- Kelloway, E. K.(1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
- McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
- Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Chase, M. A., Reckase, M. D. & Hancock, G. R. (2008). The Coaching Efficacy Scale II—High School Teams. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(6), 1059-1076.
- Myers, N. D., Vargas-Tonsing, T. M. & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Coaching efficacy in intercollegiate coaches: Sources, coaching behavior, and team variables. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(1), 129-143.
- Myers, N. D., Wolfe, E. W. & Feltz, D. L. (2005). An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Coaching Efficacy Scale for Coaches From the United States of America. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(3), 135-160.
- Nunnally, J.(1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
- Short, S. E., Smiley, M. & Ross-Stewart, L. (2005). The relationship between efficacy beliefs and imagery use in coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 19(4), 380-394.
- Smoll, F. L. & Smith, R. E. (1989). Leadership behaviors in sport: A theoretical model and research paradigm. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(18), 1522-1551.
- Şimşek, Ö. F.(2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş; Temel İlkelerve LISREL Uygulamaları [Introduction to structural equation modelling; basic principles and LISREL applications]. Ankara: Ekinox.
- Tavşancıl, E.(2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve spss ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Abstract
The
purpose of this study was to conduct the adaptation study for Coaching Efficacy
Scale –II developed by Feltz, Chase, Moritz ve Sullivan (1999), revised by
Myers, Feltz, Chase, Reckase and Hancock (2008) into Turkish, and examine
psychometric properties. The study was conducted with the 238 male football
coaches, coaching in the football teams in Izmir. Coaching Efficacy Scale
II-HST, which consists of 18 items under five sub-scales (motivation, game
strategy, technical teaching, character building, and physical conditioning),
was used as a data collection tool. Item analysis on the mean differences
between 27% upper and lower groups and confirmatory factor analysis were
applied, and coefficients of internal consistency of the scale and its
sub-scales were calculated. SPSS 23.0 and Lisrel 8.51 package programs were
used for data analysis. Item analysis results showed that t-values of all items
in the scale were statistically significant (p<.01). Results of the
confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the data fits well with the model
(χ2= 203.73 df =123 and χ2/df = 1.66 and RMSEA = 0.052 and NNFI= 0.92 and
CFI=0.94 and IFI=0.94 and SRMR = 0.049 and GFI=0.91 and AGFI= 0.88). Cronbach's
alpha coefficients of sub-scales varied between .64 and .74. General Cronbach’s
alpha coefficients of the scale was .89. It is determined that the Coaching
Efficacy Scale-II is a reliable and valid measurement tool which can be used on
football coaches.
Keywords
References
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
- Byrne, B. M.(1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a Model for Evaluating Information Center Success Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309-334.
- Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(4), 328-354.
- Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in sports. In G. Tenenbaum &R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd. ed., pp. 111-135). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Feltz, D. L., Chase, M. A., Moritz, S. E. & Sullivan, P. J. (1999). A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 765-776.
- Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E. & Sullivan, P. J.(2008). Self-efficacy in Sport: Human Kinetics.
- Gençer, R. T., Kiremitci, O. & Boyacıoğlu, H. (2009). Antrenörlük yeterlilik ölçeği'nin (AYÖ) psikometrİk özellikleri: Türk antrenörler üzerine bir çalişma. Sport Sciences, 4(2), 143-153.
- Horn, T. S. (2002). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 309-354). Champaign,IL: Human Kinetics.
- Horn, T. S. (2008). Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 239-268). Champaign, IL: Human Knetics.
- Hoye, R., Smith, A., Westerbeek, H., Stewart, B. & Nicholson, M.(2006). Sport management : Principles and applications: Elsevier.
- Hu, L. t. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24.
- Kelloway, E. K.(1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
- McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
- Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Chase, M. A., Reckase, M. D. & Hancock, G. R. (2008). The Coaching Efficacy Scale II—High School Teams. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(6), 1059-1076.
- Myers, N. D., Vargas-Tonsing, T. M. & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Coaching efficacy in intercollegiate coaches: Sources, coaching behavior, and team variables. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(1), 129-143.
- Myers, N. D., Wolfe, E. W. & Feltz, D. L. (2005). An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Coaching Efficacy Scale for Coaches From the United States of America. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(3), 135-160.
- Nunnally, J.(1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
- Short, S. E., Smiley, M. & Ross-Stewart, L. (2005). The relationship between efficacy beliefs and imagery use in coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 19(4), 380-394.
- Smoll, F. L. & Smith, R. E. (1989). Leadership behaviors in sport: A theoretical model and research paradigm. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(18), 1522-1551.
- Şimşek, Ö. F.(2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş; Temel İlkelerve LISREL Uygulamaları [Introduction to structural equation modelling; basic principles and LISREL applications]. Ankara: Ekinox.
- Tavşancıl, E.(2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve spss ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Sports Medicine |
| Journal Section | Original Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 29, 2017 |
| Acceptance Date | December 16, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |
