Evaluating the Educational Effectiveness of Radar Systems Laboratory Sessions in the Undergraduate Curriculum
Abstract
Introductory courses regarding radar technologies are very popular in the undergraduate curriculum of many electrical and electronics engineering departments. Hands-on experience is an essential part for understanding the theoretical concepts given in lectures. In most cases, it is not affordable for universities to acquire experimental radar systems, especially those in developing countries. This paper presents a detailed description of a cost-effective, easy-to-deploy radar system laboratory sessions and measures the educational effectiveness of the proposed material. The provided radar models can be used in teaching undergraduate students the working principles of frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar systems, as well as assisting graduate students in their research activities. The effectiveness of the laboratory sessions is measured thoroughly via qualitative and quantitative methods based on the proposed learning process and students’ success. The results show that the lab sessions have increased the students' understanding of the topics covered within the course, and the students' general perception is positive.
Keywords
Educational Technology, Engineering Education, Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave, Radar Systems
References
- [1] Sianez, D. M., Fugère, M. A., & Lennon, C. A. (2010). Technology and engineering education students’ perceptions of hands-on and hands-off activities. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), 291-299.
- [2] Vásquez-Carbonell, M. (2022). A systematic literature review of augmented reality in engineering education: Hardware, software, student motivation & development recommendations. Digital Education Review, 41, 249-267.
- [3] Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (2005). Teaching prospective engineering faculty how to teach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(5), 925.
- [4] Gokdogan, B. Y., Coruk, R. B., Benzaghta, M., & Kara, A. (2023). A hybrid-flipped classroom approach: Students’ perception and performance assessment. Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(3), 16.
- [5] Singh, J., Perera, V., Magana, A. J., Newell, B., Wei-Kocsis, J., Seah, Y. Y., & Xie, C. (2022). Using machine learning to predict engineering technology students’ success with computer-aided design. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(3), 852-862.
- [6] Coruk, R. B., Yalcinkaya, B., & Kara, A. (2020). On the design and effectiveness of simulink-based educational material for a communication systems course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1641-1651.
- [7] Coruk, R. B., Gokdogan, B. Y., Benzaghta, M., & Kara, A. (2022). On the classification of modulation schemes using higher order statistics and support vector machines. Wireless Personal Communications, 126(2), 1363-1381.
- [8] Diewald, A. R., Wallrath, P., & Müller, S. (2018, September). Five radar sessions for university education. In 2018 48th European Microwave Conference (EuMC) (pp. 456-459). IEEE.
- [9] Poveda-García, M., López-Pastor, J. A., Gómez-Alcaraz, A., Martínez-Tamargo, L. M., Pérez-Buitrago, M., Martínez-Sala, A., & Gómez-Tornero, J. L. (2018, September). Amplitude-monopulse radar lab using WiFi cards. In 2018 48th European Microwave Conference (EuMC) (pp. 464-467). IEEE.
- [10] Chilson, P. B., & Yeary, M. B. (2011). Hands-on learning modules for interdisciplinary environments: An example with a focus on weather radar applications. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(2), 238-247.
