The systematic review of studies about web-based learning in language teaching context

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 123 - 136, 31.08.2021

Zülal Ayar

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.957362

Cited By: 1

Abstract

As is also labelled as online learning or e-learning, Web-based learning (WBL) has recently come to the forefront in language education thanks to a huge number of online teaching practices the pandemic has induced as well as the new platforms and some applications accommodating language studies. As such, the current research has been orchestrated to review prestigious academic papers on WBL in ELT published in flagship journals from the years 2015 to 2020. Moreover, it has aimed at clarifying the recent trends on e-learning platforms. Accordingly, 20 empirical research with quantitative, qualitative, or mixed designs indexed in Clarivate Analytics (Thomson Reuters) were incorporated into the study. Having meticulously investigated them particularly considering the education context, participants, and the methods, the researcher found out that an overwhelming majority of the studies were administered in higher education context according to mixed and quantitative research designs. Furthermore, the research on online learning platforms was heavily related to one of the macro skills (i.e. writing) besides listening and vocabulary to a degree. Another fundamental result was the limited number of studies employing blended learning contexts enriched with authentic activities which would make learners use higher-order thinking skills in the digital world. Finally, some suggestions have been offered to future directions in order to enhance the creativity in WBL research.

Keywords

E-learning, language learning, online learning, systematic review, web-based learning

References

• Ahamer, G. (2010). A short history of web based learning including GIS. International Journal of Computer Science & Emerging Technologies, 1(4), 101-111.
• Alizadeh, I. (2019). Using an LMS in teaching English: A qualitative content analysis of medical sciences students’ evaluations and suggestions. The Qualitative Report, 24(11), 2851-2873. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss11/12
• Beard, C., Wilson, J. P., & McCarter, R. (2007). Towards a theory of e-learning: Experiential e-learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 6(2), 3-15. Retrieved from: www.heacademy.ac.uk/hlst/resources/johlste
• Bork, A. (2001). Adult education, lifelong learning, and the future. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 18(5), 195-203.
• Chai, J. (2017). Development of computer English education platform based on B/S model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12, 86-94. doi:10.3991/ijet.v12.i08.7134
• Chung, T. (2003). Web-based learning (E-learning). Retrieved from http://www.thecorner.org/elearning.
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Cotos, E., Link, S., & Huffman, S. (2017). Effects of DDL technology on genre learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 104–130. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2017/cotoslinkhuffman.pdf
• Cross, R. (2020). Synchronous online teaching of English as a foreign language with young learners: How do teachers do it? CSBS INSPIRE Student Research & Engagement Conference. 79. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/csbsresearchconf/2020/all/79
• Gava, I. Y., & Costa, N. V. D. (2018). A socio-cognitive approach to the development of EFL writing skills through a collaborative online discussion forum in a university course. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 6-25.
• Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic review. London: Sage Publications.
• Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg MD: Advanced Analytics.
• Han, H. (2019). Design and implementation of web-based English autonomous learning system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14, 18-26. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9718
• Hirata, Y. & Hirata, Y. (2019). Applying ‘Sketch Engine for Language Learning’ in the Japanese English classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 233–248. doi:10.1007/s12528-019-09208-z
• İnal, M. & Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The effect of web based blended learning on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards English course. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2603–2619. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09890-7
• Jeong, K. (2016). Integrating a web-based platform to promote creativity and authenticity in language classrooms. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 11, 127-136. doi:10.1504/IJKL.2016.079752
• Karaaslan, H., Kılıç, N., Güven-Yalçın, G., & Güllü, A. (2018). Students' reflections on vocabulary learning through synchronous and asynchronous games and activities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 53-70.
• Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16-24.
• Liang, X. & Pang, J. (2019). An innovative English teaching mode based on massive open online course and Google collaboration platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14, 182-192. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i15.11148
• Liu, X. & Zhang, J. (2018). Application of computer distance education in practical English writing teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13, 71-82. doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i04.8471
• Lu, L. (2017). Study on the effectiveness of computer-aided software in helping college students memorize English words. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12, 118-127. doi:10.3991/ijet.v12.i08.7146
• Lu, Z., Zheng, C. & Li, Z. (2018). Effects of embedded summary writing on EFL learners' anxiety and oral production in a computer-based testing environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 5, 221-241. doi:10.1007/s40692-018-0105-1.
• Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers and Education, 68, 76–85.
• Meissner, C. A. (2021). “What works?” Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the investigative interviewing research literature. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 322-328. doi:10.1002/acp.3808
• Meurers, D., Kuthy, K. D., Nuxoll, F., Rudzewitz, B., & Ziai, R. (2019). Scaling up intervention studies to investigate real-life foreign language learning in school. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39, 161-188. doi:10.1017/S0267190519000126
• Miao, J. & Mao, L. (2018). Influence analysis of computer modular learning environment on college English listening teaching effect. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13, 129-138. doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i04.8476
• Moorhouse, B. L., & Beaumont, A. M. (2020). Utilizing video conferencing software to teach young language learners in Hong Kong during the COVID‐19 class suspensions. TESOL Journal, 11, 545. doi:10.1002/tesj.545
• Mudra, H. (2020). Digital literacy among young learners: How do EFL teachers and learners view its benefits and barriers? Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 3-24, http://www.tewtjournal.org
• National Educational Technology Standards for Students. (1998). ISTE.
• Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Qiu, L. (2019). Computer-aided English teaching platform based on secure shell framework. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14, 143-154. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i16.11149
• Quadir, B., Chen, N. S., & Yang, J. C. (2019). Investigation of the generational differences of two types of blog writers: The generation gap influence. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17, 54-70. doi:10.4018/IJDET.2019100104
• Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Post-digital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
• Selçuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: Self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781
• Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
• Yu, W. C. W. (2018). English writing via a social networking platform. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14, 17-32. doi: 10.4018/IJICTE.2018010102
• Zahonero, M. L. & Degano, C. (2016). Enhancing metalinguistic awareness through collaborative computer assisted specialised translation: A rationale for the WALLeT project. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(1), 9-30.
• Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2014). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New media & society, 17, 1007-1024. doi: 10.1177/1461444813520477