Aim: To compare slit-lamp manual marking and Verion imageguided
marking in toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using
vector analysis.
Material and Method: Eyes with manual marking were defined as
group 1 and eyes with Verion image-guided marking were defined
as group 2. Target-induced and surgically induced astigmatism,
the magnitude and angle of error, the success index, toric IOL rotation,
and refractive outcomes were compared.
Results: A total of 67 eyes were examined, with 37 in group 1 and
30 in group 2. Higher degrees of IOL rotation (≥10°) were predominantly
observed in the manual marking group. Group 2 had a lower
toric IOL rotation in eyes with against-the-rule astigmatism than in
group 1 (P=0.003). In Group 2, error size was negatively correlated
with refractive astigmatism (r=−0.37, P=0.04), whereas the angle
of error was positively correlated with best-corrected visual acuity
(r=0.526, P=0.003).
Conclusion: Vectorial analysis shows that digital marking is more
effective and yields more predictable outcomes for toric IOL rotation
compared to manual marking, particularly in eyes with
against-the-rule astigmatism and high astigmatism. This improved
predictability is attributed to more accurate axis alignment.
astigmatism phacoemulsification image-guided marking manual marking toric intraocular lens vector analysis
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Clinical Sciences (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | April 14, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | November 5, 2025 |
| Publication Date | March 19, 2026 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA65ZE48SN |
| Published in Issue | Year 2026 Volume: 16 Issue: 1 |