POST KEYNESYEN İKTİSATTA FONKSİYONEL GELİR DAĞILIMININ EVRİMİ: ELEŞTİREL BİR LİTERATÜR ANALİZİ

Year 2020, Volume: 11 Issue: 21, 331 - 352, 30.06.2020

Sinem Kutlu László Csaba Horváth

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2020.016

Abstract

Post Keynesyen
yaklaşım ana-akım iktisadın teorik çerçevesinin dışında olmasına rağmen gerçek
dünyaya ilişkin iktisadi sorunlara getirdiği görüş ve kavrayış biçimi ile
iktisat literatüründe çok önemli bir yere sahiptir. 1950’lerden günümüze Post
Keynesyen iktisadın odak noktasında yer alan fonksiyonel gelir dağılımı konusu
makro iktisat alanındaki güncelliğini korumaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Post
Keynesyen iktisatta fonksiyonel gelir dağılımının evrimini literatür taraması
ile eleştirel olarak analiz etmektir. Bu bağlamda, çalışma Post Keynesyen görüş
çerçevesinde gelir dağılımına ilişkin tartışma ve fikir ayrılıklarına ışık
tutmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları, gelir dağılımı teorisine ilişkin
gelecekte yapılması muhtemel çalışmalarda farklı yaklaşımların temel varsayım
ve özellikleri esas alınarak oluşturulacak sentezci modellerin Post Keynesyen
analize katkı sağlayacağına işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

Post Keynesyen İktisat, Fonksiyonel Gelir Dağılımı, Cambridge Teoremi

References

• Asimakopulos, A. & Burbidge, J. B. (1974). The short-period Incidence of Taxation. Economic Journal, 84(334), 267-288.
• Dalziel, P. C. (1989). Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mas.): A Keynesian Solution of the "Pasinetti Paradox"- Comment. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 11, 648-53.
• Dalziel, P. C. (1991). A Generalisation and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(3), 287-300.
• Dalziel, P. C. (1991-92) Does Government Activity Invalidate the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit? A Reconciliation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 14(2), 225-232.
• Damania, R. & Mair, D. (1992). A Post Keynesian Approach to the Incidence of Taxation. Developments in Post Keynesian Economics: Essays on Methodology, Pricing, Distribution and Policy, P. Arestis and V. Chick (Eds.), Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 123-142.
• Dow, S. (1991). The Post-Keynesian School. A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics, D. Mair, A.G. Miller (Eds.), Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 176-206.
• Fleck, F. H. & Domenghino, C. M. (1987). Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mas.): A Keynesian Solution of the "Pasinetti Paradox". Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 10, 22-36.
• Fleck, F. H. & Domenghino, C. M. (1990). Government Activity does Invalidate the "Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 12(3), 487-97.
• Harrod, R.F. (1939). An Essay in Dynamic Theory. The Economic Journal, 49(193), 14-33.
• Hart, N. & Kriesler, P. (2015). Post-Keynesian Economics – A User’s Guide. UNSW Business School Research Paper, No. 2015 ECON 12.
• Holt, R.P.F. (2007). What is Post Keynesian Economics?. Post Keynesian Macroeconomics: Essays in Honour of Ingrid Rima, M. Forstater, G. Mongiovi, S. Pressman (Eds.), London: Routledge, 89-107.
• Kaldor, N. (1955–56). Alternative Theories of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23(2), 83-100.
• Kalecki, M. (1954). Theory of Economic Dynamics. London: Unwin University Books.
• Keen, S. (2003). Growth Theory. The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, J. E. King (Ed.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 175-180.
• Keynes, J. M. (1965), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, NewYork: Harbinger Book.
• Laramie, A. J. (1991). Taxation and Kalecki’s Distribution Factors. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 13(4), 583-594.
• Laramie, A. J. & Mair, D. (1993). The Incidence of Business Rates: A Post-Keynesian Approach. Review of Political Economy, 5(1), 55-72.
• Laramie, A. J. & Mair, D. (1996). Taxation and Kalecki’s Theory of the Business Cycle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(4), 451-464.
• Laramie, A.J. & Mair, D. (2000). A Dynamic Theory of Taxation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Lavoie, M. (2014). Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Mair, D. & Laramie, A.J. (1992). The Incidence of Business Rates on Manufacturing Industry. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 39(1), 76-94.
• Mott, T. & Slattery, E. (1994). Tax Incidence and Macroeconomic Effects in a Kaleckian Model when Profits Finance Affects Investment and Prices may Respond to Taxes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16 (3), 391-409.
• Palley, T.I. (1996). Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution and the Macro Economy. London: Macmillan.
• Palley, T.I. (2003). Income Distribution. The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, J. E. King (Ed.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 181-186.
• Pasinetti, L.L. (1962). Rate of Profit and Income Distribution In Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 29 (4), 103-20.
• Pasinetti, L.L. (1989). Government Deficit Spending is not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 11(4), 641-47.
• Robinson, J. (1962). Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. London: Macmillan.
• Samuelson, P. A. & Modigliani, F. (1966). The Pasinetti Paradox in Neo-Classical and More General Models. Review of Economic Studies, 33, 269-301.
• Steedman, I. (1972). The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process. Economic Journal, 82 (328), 1387-95.