Research on the Relationship Between Religious Education and Authoritarianism

Year 2015, , 19 - 27, 30.01.2016

İbrahim Gürses

https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.288012

Abstract

The positive relationship between religiosity and authoritarianism has been underlined in several studies. However, such studies have not taken into account the source and formation of religious education and whether or not the religious education approaches of the devotees paved the way for authoritarianism. In our study, the relationship between religious education and authoritarianism is examined. Individuals’ authoritarian affinities, which tend to change according to the institutions at which they receive religious education, were identified. A Likert-type scale was employed and a correlation matrix was applied to the variables. The sample included a total of 315 subjects (204 females and 111 males) studying at various faculties in Uludağ University.

Keywords

Religiosity, Authoritarianism, Dogmatism, Prejudice

References

• Adorno, J. W., Frenkel-Bruswık, E., Levinson, D. J., Sanford, P. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, Harper, NewYork.
• Altemeyer, B. and Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religous fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2 (2), 113-133.
• Argyle, Micheal and Hallahmi, Benjamin B. (1975). The Social Psychology of Religion. Routledge, Boston.
• Batmaz, V. (2006). Otoriteryen Kişilik, Salyangoz Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Gürses, İbrahim. (2001). Kölelik ve Özgürlük Arasında Din, Arasta Yayınları, Bursa.
• Harre, R and Lamb, R. (1986). The Dictionary of Personality and Social Psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Harlak, H. (2000). Önyargılar Psikososyal Bir İnceleme, Sistem Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Ji, C. C., and Ibrahim, Y. (2007). Islamic religiosity inright-wing authoritarianism. Review of ReligiousResearch, 49, 128-147.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1972). Sosyal Değişmenin Psikolojik Boyutları, Sos. Bil. Der. Yayınları, Ankara.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1973). Gençlerin Tutumları Kültürlerarası Bir Karşılaştırma, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara.
• Kayıklık, H. (2001). Çeşitli meslek gruplarında dinsel eğilim ile hoşgörüsüzlük üzerine bir araştırma, Ç. Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1 (1), 125-134.
• Leak, G. K., and Randall, B. A. (1995). Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: The role of religious maturity. Journal forthe Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 245-252.
• Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind, Basic Boks, New York.
• Rubinstein, G. (1995). Authoritarianism in Israeli society. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 237-249.
• Sanford, N. (2006). “Çağdaş Açılımla Yetkeci Kişilik”, Otoriteryen Kişilik, Derleyen, Veysel Batmaz, Salyangoz Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Sanua, Victor D. (1977). "Religion, Mental Health and Personality", Current Perspectives in The Psychology of Religion, ed. Newton Malony, B. Eeardmans Publ., Michigan.
• Sennett, R.Otorite, (1992). (çev.Kamil Durand), Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Türkdoğan, O. (1996). Sosyal Şiddet ve Türkiye Gerçeği, Timaş Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Uysal, V. and Ayten, A. (2005). Karikatür krizi bağlamında yerel-evrensel tutumlar ve dindarlık, M. Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (2), 27-40.
• Yapıcı, A. (2004). Din Kimlik ve Önyargı Biz ve Onlar, Karahan Yayınları, Adana.