Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty

Year 2017, Issue: 29, 65 - 81, 30.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182

Abstract

My guiding research hypothesis is as follows: the significant progress made by the phenomenology of immanence (according to which no worldly hetero-givenness would be possible without subjectif self-givenness) and by the phenomenology of transcendence (which states that no subjectif self-givenness would be possible without worldly hetero-givenness) are not distinguished so much by the positing of new problems as by the reformulation of “the question of the ground of intentionality” that fueled the entire phenomenological tradition. It is striking that despite the different solutions they offer, these two approaches have the same critical orientation regarding phenomenology (they characterize intentionality by its failure to ensure its own foundation), and they have the task of testing phenomenology in a confrontation with its various outsides such as “Invisible”, “Totality”, “Affectivity” or “Le visage” which escape the Husserlian concept of experience determined by the consciousness and its correlative noetic-noematic structure. This pathos of thought which is proper to the French phenomenology wants to go further than what remains unquestioned in Husserl (presence determined in the solid figures of intuition and objectness), and in Heidegger (presence determined as phenomenon of being). This new phenomenological movement reorganize and revise the method of classic phenomenology and deal with a certain experience of “hyper-phenomenon” or “counter-phenomenon” which is an event of appearing that establishes itself by itself.

References

  • BARBARAS, Renaud (2006) Desire and Distance Introduction to a Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Paul B. Milan, California: Stanford University Press.
  • BOEHM, Rudolf (1959) “Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’immanence et de transcendance”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, vol 149, pp. 481-527.
  • HENRY, Michel (2015) “Material Phenomenology”, The Quiet Powers of the Possible Interviews in Contemporary French Phenomenology, edited by Tarek R. Dika and W. Chris Hackett, foreword by Richard Kearney, New York: Fordham University Press.
  • HENRY, Michel (1963) L’essence de la manifestation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1964) Leçons pour une phénoménologie de la conscience intime du temps, translated by. Henri Dussot, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1970a) Cartesian Meditations, translated by Dorion Cairns, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1970b) Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, translated by David Carr, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1962) Ideas I: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson, New York: Collier.
  • MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (1968) The Visible and the Invisible, translated by Alphonso Lingis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (2005) Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Paul Kegan, London: Routledge.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1988) Qu'est-ce que la phénoménologie? translated by E. Abrams, Grenoble: Millon, 1988.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1992) Introduction à la phénoménologie de Husserl, translated by E. Abrams Grenoble: Millon.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1995) Papiers phenomenologiques, translated by E. Abrams, Grenoble: Millon.
  • ROMANO, Claude (2015) At the Heart of Reason, translated by Michael B. Smith and Claude Romano, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • SEBBAH, François-David (2012) Testing the limit: Derrida, Henry, Levinas, and the phenomenological tradition, translated by Stephen Barker, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ŞAN, Emre (2012) Transcendance comme problème phénoménologique: Lecture de Merleau-Ponty et Patočka, prefaced by Renaud Barbaras, Paris: Mimesis.
Year 2017, Issue: 29, 65 - 81, 30.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182

Abstract

References

  • BARBARAS, Renaud (2006) Desire and Distance Introduction to a Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Paul B. Milan, California: Stanford University Press.
  • BOEHM, Rudolf (1959) “Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’immanence et de transcendance”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, vol 149, pp. 481-527.
  • HENRY, Michel (2015) “Material Phenomenology”, The Quiet Powers of the Possible Interviews in Contemporary French Phenomenology, edited by Tarek R. Dika and W. Chris Hackett, foreword by Richard Kearney, New York: Fordham University Press.
  • HENRY, Michel (1963) L’essence de la manifestation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1964) Leçons pour une phénoménologie de la conscience intime du temps, translated by. Henri Dussot, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1970a) Cartesian Meditations, translated by Dorion Cairns, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1970b) Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, translated by David Carr, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • HUSSERL, Edmund (1962) Ideas I: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson, New York: Collier.
  • MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (1968) The Visible and the Invisible, translated by Alphonso Lingis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (2005) Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Paul Kegan, London: Routledge.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1988) Qu'est-ce que la phénoménologie? translated by E. Abrams, Grenoble: Millon, 1988.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1992) Introduction à la phénoménologie de Husserl, translated by E. Abrams Grenoble: Millon.
  • PATOČKA, Jan (1995) Papiers phenomenologiques, translated by E. Abrams, Grenoble: Millon.
  • ROMANO, Claude (2015) At the Heart of Reason, translated by Michael B. Smith and Claude Romano, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • SEBBAH, François-David (2012) Testing the limit: Derrida, Henry, Levinas, and the phenomenological tradition, translated by Stephen Barker, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ŞAN, Emre (2012) Transcendance comme problème phénoménologique: Lecture de Merleau-Ponty et Patočka, prefaced by Renaud Barbaras, Paris: Mimesis.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Emre Şan 0000-0003-2654-9707

Publication Date October 30, 2017
Submission Date October 6, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Issue: 29

Cite

APA Şan, E. (2017). Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(29), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182
AMA Şan E. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. October 2017;(29):65-81. doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182
Chicago Şan, Emre. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, no. 29 (October 2017): 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182.
EndNote Şan E (October 1, 2017) Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 29 65–81.
IEEE E. Şan, “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”, Kaygı, no. 29, pp. 65–81, October 2017, doi: 10.20981/kaygi.342182.
ISNAD Şan, Emre. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 29 (October 2017), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.342182.
JAMA Şan E. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. 2017;:65–81.
MLA Şan, Emre. “Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, no. 29, 2017, pp. 65-81, doi:10.20981/kaygi.342182.
Vancouver Şan E. Intentionality and Givenness in French Phenomenology: M. Henry and M. Merleau Ponty. Kaygı. 2017(29):65-81.

Cited By

e-ISSN: 2645-8950