Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children

Sunay Yıldırım Doğru; Duygu Çetingöz

EN TR

Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate a sensorial education program using Montessori sensorial materials on receptive language development of 8 young children (DSM-V) with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). At the end of 6 months intervention period, the sensory processing of the participants was evaluated using Sensory Processing Evaluation Form for Children with ASD and their receptive language level was measured using Peabody Picture – Vocabulary Test. In this study, multiple survey models between subjects were used in single subject design. The emerging findings of the research suggest that there is a substantial improvement in auditory, visual and tactile skills of five out of eight participants. The remainder three participants demonstrated increase in their receptive language scores but a little improvement was observed in their auditory, tactile and visual comprehension.

Keywords

Peabody Picture-Vocabulary Test,Sensorial Education,Montessori Sensorial Materials,Young Children with ASD.

References

Ayres AJ. ve Tickle LS. (1980) Hyper-responsivity to Touch and Vestibular Stimuli as a Predictor of Positive Response to Sensory Integration Procedures by Autistic Children. American Journal Occup Therapy volume 34, no:6.
Baranek GT. (2002) Effectiveness of sensory and motor interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 397–422.
Baranek GT., Foster LG. and Berkson G. (1997) Sensory defensiveness in persons with developmental disabilities. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17(3); 173-185.
Bayraktar E. (2007) Görsel Sanatlar Eğitiminin Otistik Çocuklar Üzerindeki Etkileri, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Bettison S. (1996) The long term effects of auditory training on children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(3); 361-372.
Blanche E.I., Botticelli T.M. ve Hallway M.K. (1995) Combining Neuro- Developmental Treatment and Sensory Integration Principles. America, Therapy Skill Builders.
Bogdashina O. (2003) Sensory perceptual issues in autism and Asperger syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bono MA., Daley LT. ve Sigman M. (2004). Relations among joint attention, amount of ıntervention and language gain in autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 34: 495-505.
Carvill S. (2001) Sensory impairment, intellectual disability and psychiatry. Journal of Intellectual Disability, 45(6); 467-483.
Çakıroğlu Wilbrandt E. (2008) Okul Öncesi Dönem Montessori Yöntemi ile Kaynaştırma Uygulamaları. Ankara: Poyraz Ofset.

Çiftçi, Z. (2006) Otistik Çocuklarda Kullanım Bilimsel Bileşenin Dildeki Görünümünün Gözlenmesi, Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Dawson G. ve Watling R. (2000) Intervention to facilitade auditory, visual, and motor integration in autism: a review of the evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(5); 415-425.
Devrimci-Özgüven H., Öner Ö. ve Ölmez Ş. (2001) Erişkin asperger bozukluğu olgusunun klinik ve nöropsikolojik degerlendirmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(3); 233-240.
Diken, İ.H. (2011) Otistik bozukluğu olan öğrenciler. (Ed.) Diken, İ.H. Özel Eğitime Gereksinimi Olan Öğrenciler ve Özel Eğitim. Ünite 13, s: 409-447, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları, 4. Baskı.
Erben, S. (2005) Montessori Materyallerinin Zihin Engelli ve İşitme Engelli Çocukların Alıcı Dil Gelişiminden Görsel Algı Düzeyine Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
Fazlıoğlu Y. (2004) Duyusal Entegrasyon Programinin Otizmli Çocuklarin Duyusal ve Davranış Problemleri Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ev Ekonomisi (Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi) Anabilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi.
Field T., Lasko D., Mundy P., Henteleff T., Kabat S., Talpins S. ve Dowling M. (1997) Brief report: autistic childrens attentiveness and responsivity improve after touch therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(3); 333-338.
Golstein, H. 2000. Commentary: Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual and motor integration: ‘show me the data’’. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(5); 423-425.
Grandin, T. 1998. Teaching tips from a recovered autistic. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 3(1); 1-8. Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Kayılı G. ve Arı R. (2011) Examination of the Effects of the Montessori Method on Preschool Children’s Readiness to Primary Education. Educational Sciences:Theory & Practice, 11(4), 2091-2109. SSCI
Kırcaali-İftar, G. ve Tekin, E. (1997). Tek-Denekli Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
Kim H., Kim A. ve Cunningham KW. (2012) Vacuolar H+ -ATPase (V-ATPase) Promotes Vacuolar Membrane Permeabilization and Nonapoptotic Death in Stressed Yeast. Jaurnal of Biol Chem 287(23):19029-39
Koçyiğit S., Kayılı G. ve Erbay F. (2010). Montessori Yönteminin Beş - Altı Yaş Çocuklarının Dikkat Toplama Becerilerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 372, 16–21.
Leary M. ve Hill D. (1996) Moving on: autism and movement distrubance. Mental Retardation, 34(1); 39-53.
Lillard AS. (2011) Mindfulness practices in education: Montessori’s approach. Mindfulness, 2, 78-85.
Matson J., Benavidez D., ve Comton L. (1996) Behavior treatment of autistic persons: a review of research from 1980 to the present. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17(6); 433-465.
Montessori M. (1994) From Childhood to Adolescence. Oxford, England: ABC-Clio. pp. 7–16. O’Neill, M. ve Jones, R. P. 1997. Sensory-perceptual abnormalities in autism: a case for more research ? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(3); 283-293.
Rogers SJ., Hepbrun SL.ve Wehner E. (2003) Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with other developmental disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(6): 631-642.
Tamchek SD. ve Dunn W. (2007) Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the short sensory profile. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (2), 190-200.
Tawney, J. W. ve Gast, D. L. (1984). Single Subject Resarch in Special Education. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
Toth K., Munson J., Meltzoff AN., ve Dawson G. (2006) Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: Joint attention, imitation, and toy play. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 993–1005.
Yıldırım Doğru SS., Alabay E. ve Kayılı G. (2010) Normal Gelişim Gösteren ve Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Çocukların Sözcük Dağarcığı ile Dili Anlama Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Elementary Education Online (6) 3.
Yıldırım Doğru SS. (2014) The Efficacy of Attention Training on Upskilling The Children’s Ability to Notice Details and Attention Focusing Skills.(International Journal of Academic Research Part B; 2014; 6(1)).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sunay Yıldırım Doğru This is me

Duygu Çetingöz This is me

Publication Date

September 15, 2017

Submission Date

October 11, 2017

Acceptance Date

February 17, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 25 Number: 5

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND

APA

Yıldırım Doğru, S., & Çetingöz, D. (2017). Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(5), 1819-1834. https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND

AMA

1.Yıldırım Doğru S, Çetingöz D. Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2017;25(5):1819-1834. https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND

Chicago

Yıldırım Doğru, Sunay, and Duygu Çetingöz. 2017. “Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 (5): 1819-34. https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND.

EndNote

Yıldırım Doğru S, Çetingöz D (September 1, 2017) Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 5 1819–1834.

IEEE

[1]S. Yıldırım Doğru and D. Çetingöz, “Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children”, Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1819–1834, Sept. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND

ISNAD

Yıldırım Doğru, Sunay - Çetingöz, Duygu. “Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25/5 (September 1, 2017): 1819-1834. https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND.

JAMA

1.Yıldırım Doğru S, Çetingöz D. Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children. Kastamonu Education Journal. 2017;25:1819–1834.

MLA

Yıldırım Doğru, Sunay, and Duygu Çetingöz. “Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children”. Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, Sept. 2017, pp. 1819-34, https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND.

Vancouver

1.Sunay Yıldırım Doğru, Duygu Çetingöz. Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children. Kastamonu Education Journal [Internet]. 2017 Sep. 1;25(5):1819-34. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA93JW95ND

Kastamonu Education Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children

Evaluation Of Sensorial Education On Receptive Language Development Of Autistic Children

Abstract

Keywords

Duyu Eğitiminin Otistik Çocukların Alıcı Dil Gelişimine Etkileri

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite