ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE PSİKOLOJİK İYİ OLUŞ İLE AYRIŞMA-BİREYLEŞME

Year 2021, , 124 - 133, 30.11.2021

İlhan Çiçek

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.780535

Cited By: 6

Abstract

Modern dünyada teknolojik gelişmelerin hızlı bir ivme kazanmasıyla birlikte, insanların bağımsız bir hayat yaşama isteklerinde önemli bir artış olduğu açık bir gerçektir. Bu yüzden insanların ayrışmış/bireyleşmiş olmaları ile psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin ne olduğunun araştırılması önemli bir problem alanı olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik iyi oluş düzeyleri ile ayrışma-bireyleşme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmaya yaşları 18 ile 26 arasında değişen (M=21.35, SD=10.50), 285 üniversite öğrencisi (kız=180, erkek=105, 1.sınıf 170, 2. sınıf 115) katılmıştır. Katılımcılardan elde edilen veriler, bağımsız t testi, ANOVA, Pearson Çarpım Momentler Korelasyon ve Çoklu Regresyon aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik iyi oluş puanları ile ayrışma-bireyleşme düzeyleri arasında anlamlı ve negatif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği, ayrışma-bireyleşmenin %23’ni yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin ayrışma-bireyleşme düzeyleri yükseldikçe, psikolojik iyi oluşlarında düşüş olduğu saptanmıştır. Öte yandan öğrencilerin cinsiyet değişkenine göre ayrışma-bireyleşme puanları anlamlı çıkmazken, psikolojik iyi oluş puanları anlamlı çıkmıştır. Sınıf düzeyi değişkenine göre ise, ayrışma-bireyleşme puanları anlamlı olduğu, psikolojik iyi oluş puanlarının anlamlı olmadığı saptanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları ilgili literatür çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve yeni çalışmalar için araştırmacılara öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Psikikolojik İyi Oluş,, Pozitif Psikoloji, Ayrışma, Bireyleşme, Üniversite Öğrencileri

PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND SEPARATION-INDIVIDUATION IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

In this modern world, a significant increase in people’s wish to lead on an independent life has been a plain truth since technological advancements have gained acceleration. Hence, it is thought that searching the relation between separation/individuation and psychological well-being of people is an important problem field. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relation between well-being levels and separation/individuation levels of university students. 285 University students (female=180, male=105; 1st class=170, 2nd class=115) whose ages are in the range from 18 to26 (M=21.35, SD =2.50) participated in the study. The data obtained from the participants were analyzed through independent t-test, ANOVA, Pearson Product Moments Correlation and Multiple Regression. According to the results obtained, a significant and negative relationship was found between the psychological well-being scores of university students and their levels of separation-individuation. Besides, the psychological well-being scale was determined to predict 23% of separation-individuation. As the levels of separation-individuation of students increased, psychological well-being decreased. On the other hand, while the separation-individuation scores of the students were not significant according to the gender variable, the psychological well-being scores were significant. According to the class level variable, the scores of separation-individuation were found to be significant, while psychological well-being scores were not. The results of the study were discussed within the framework of the relevant literature and suggestions were presented to the researchers for new studies.

Keywords

Psychological Well-Being,, Positive Psychology,, Separation,, Individuation,, University Students.

References

• Akhun, M. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinde algılanan ebeveynlik biçimleri, erken dönem uyumsuz şemaları, benlik kurguları ve duygu düzenleme güçlüğünün psikolojik belirtilerle ilişkisi. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), HacettepeÜniversitesi, Ankara
• Allen, S. F., & Stoltenberg, C. D. (1995). Psychological separation of older adolescents and young adults from their parents: An investigation of gender differences. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 542-546.
• Altop, E. (2018).Düşük sosyo ekonomik durumlu ergenlerde psikolojik iyioluş: sistemimeşrulaştırma ve duyguların rolü. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Ted Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Andereassen, H. K. (2009). Separation-individuation and its effect on diabetes management and diabetes control in young women with type 1diabetes. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Victoria University, Melbourne.
• Arslan, G. (2018). Social exclusion, social support and psychological wellbeing at school: A study of mediation and moderation effect. Child indicators research, 11(3), 897-918.
• Aslan, A. E., & Çiçek, İ. (2020). Examination of Separation-Individuation Levels and Peer Relations of Adolescents According to Spesific Several Variables. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 17(1), 83-102
• Aslan, S., & Gelbal, S. (2016). Separation-Individuation of Late Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(1), 1-15.
• Atak, H. (2011). Kimlik gelişimi ve kimlik biçimlenmesi: Kuramsal bir değerlendirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3(1), 163-213.
• Aydın, A., Kahraman, N., & Hiçdurmaz, D. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin algılanan sosyal destek ve psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 8(1), 40-47.
• Bingöl, T. Y., & Batık, M. V. (2019). Unconditional Self-Acceptance and Perfectionistic Cognitions as Predictors of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(1), 67-75.
• Blazina, C., & Watkins Jr, C. E. (2000). Separation/individuation, parental attachment, and male gender role conflict: Attitudes toward the feminine and the fragile masculine self. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(2), 126.
• Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage. New York: International Universities Press.
• Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage. New York: International Universities Press.
• Buhl, H. M. (2008). Development of a model describing individuated adult child–parent relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(5), 381-389.
• Christenson, R. M., & Wilson, W. P. (1985). Assessing pathology in the separation-individuation process by an inventory.a preliminary report. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173(9), 561-572.
• Çiçek, İ., & Aslan, AE.(2019). Kişilik ile ayrışma-bireyleşme arasında akran ilişkilerinin aracılığı. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 2642-2671.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11.
• Delhaye, M., Kempenaers, C., Linkowski, P., Stroobants, R., & Goossens, L. (2012). Perceived parenting and separation-individuation in Belgian college students: Associations with emotional adjustment. The Journal of psychology, 146(4), 353-370.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Newwellbeing measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social indicators research, 97(2), 143-156.
• Eggert, J. W. (2007). Separation-individuation and disordered eating in adolescence. Michigan State University. Department of Psychology.
• Engler, J. F., & Wiemann, C. M. (2010). Separation-individuation and identity development in at-risk youth.Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 5(3), 274-283.
• Ersoy, M., Balkır, T., Karaaziz, M., & Balkır, F. (2019). Matematik Okuryazarlığı Öz yeterliliğinin ve Aile Bütçesini Planlamanın Psikolojik İyi Oluş Üzerine Etkisi. Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(1), 31-41.
• Fornari, V. M., & Pelcovitz,, D. (1999). Identity problem and borderline disorders. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2922-2932.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
• Floyd, F. J., Stein, T. S., Harter, K. S., Allison, A., & Nye, C. L. (1999). Gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Separation-individuation, parental attitudes, identity consolidation, and well-being. Journal of youth and adolescence, 28(6), 719-739.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Göçen, A. (2019). Öğretmenlerin yaşam anlamı, psikolojik sermaye ve cinsiyetinin psikolojik iyi oluşlarına etkisi. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 8(1), 135-153.
• Göral-Alkan, F. S. (2010). Coupling through projective ıdentification: Bridging role of projective identivication in the associations among early parenting exprerience, personality construct and couple relationship. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Göral, F. S. (2002). The second separation-ındividuation process of the Turkishyoungadults:Therelationships between the perceived maternal parenting attitudes, second separation individuation, expanding self and experiences in the romantic relationships.(Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
• Güleç, C. (2016). Pozitif ruh sağlığı.(3. Baskı). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınları.
• Gültekin,Z.(2019).İş güvencesinin psikolojik iyi oluşa ve performansa etkisinde meslek bağlılığın aracılık rolü. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis) Tokat Gaziosman Paşa Üniversitesi, Tokat.
• Hefferon, K., & Boniwell, I. (2014). Pozitif Psikoloji Kuram Araştırma ve Uygulamalar. Çev.Tayfun Doğan. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture'sconsequences: International differences in work-relatedvalues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizingcultures:The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychologyandculture, 2(1), 8.
• Holman, D., Johnson, S., & O'Connor, E. (2018). Stress management interventions: Improving subjective psychological well-being in the workplace. Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. DOI: nobascholar. com.
• Houben, M., Noortgate, W .V. D., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short termemotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin American Psychological Association. 141(4): 901–930.
• Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 1(2), 137-164.
• Ikiz, F. E., & Asici, E. (2017). The Relationship between Individual Innovativeness and Psychological Well-Being: The Example of Turkish Counselor Trainees. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(1), 52-63.
• İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. The Journal of Psychology, 132(1), 95-105.
• Jiang, L. C., Yang, I. M., & Wang, C. (2017). Self-disclosure to parents in emerging adulthood: Examining the roles of perceived parental responsiveness and separation–individuation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(4), 425-445.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403-422.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2006). Yeni insan ve insanlar. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
• Kahveci, A. (2019). Örgütsel erdemliğin etik iklim ve psikolojik iyi oluşa etkisi. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
• Karadayı, F. (1998). İlişkili özerklik: Kavramı, ölçülmesi, gelişimi ve toplumsal önemi, gençlere ve kültüre özgü değerlendirmeler. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Kavčič, T., & Zupančič, M. (2019).Types of separation-individuation in relation to mothers and fathers among young people entering adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(1), 66-86.
• Kaya, Z., Çenesiz, G. Z., & Aynas, S. (2019). Yabancı uyruklu öğrencilerin sosyal destek algıları ile psikolojik iyi oluş ve yaşam doyumlarının incelenmesi: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi örneği. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 18(70).
• Kermen, U., TOSUN, N. İ., & Doğan, U. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ve psikolojik iyi oluşun yordayıcısı olarak sosyal kaygı. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 20- 29.
• Keser, E. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ayrışma-bireyleşme sürecinin öz belirleme kuramı çerçevesinde incelenmesi.(Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
• Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6), 1007.
• Kins, E., Soenens, B., Beyers, W. (2012). Parental psychological control and dysfunctional separation–individuation: A tale of two different dynamics. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1099–1109. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.017
• Krause, N., & Rainville, G. (2018). Volunteering and psychological well-being: Assessing variations by gender and social context. Pastoral Psychology, 67(1), 43-53.
• Kruse, J., & Walper, S. (2008). Types of individuation in relation to parents: Predictors and outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(5), 390-400.
• Lapsley, D. K., Aalsma, M. C., & Varshney, N. M. (2001). A factor analytic and psychometric examination of pathology of separation–individuation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(7), 915-932.
• Lapsley, D. K., & Stey, P. (2010). Separation-individuation.In I. Weiner & E. Craighead (Eds.), Corsini’s encyclopedia of psychology. New York: Wiley.
• Levpušček, M. P. (2006). Adolescent individuation in relation to parents and friends: Age and gender differences. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(3), 238-264.
• Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975).The psychological birth of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
• Mahler, M. S. (1968). On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. Infantile Psychosis, Volume 1.
• Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (2015). İnsan yavrusunun psikolojik doğumu. (A. N. Babaoğlu, Çev). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Mattanah, J. F., Hancock, G. R., & Brand, B. L. (2004). Parental attachment, separation-individuation, and college student adjustment: A structural equation analysis of mediational effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 213.
• McChrystal, J., & Dolan, B. (1994). Sex-role identity and separation-individuation pathology.Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 7, 25-34.
• Memiş, A. K., & Duran, N. O. (2019). İlkokul öğrencilerinde okul nezaket algısı ve psikolojik duygusal iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 18 (4), 1671-1686.
• Meues, W., Iedema, J., Maassen, G., & Engels, R. (2005). Separation-individuation revisited: on the interplay of parent-adolescent relations, identity and emotional adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 89-106.
• Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2013). The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 509–522. doi: 10.1177/0146167213478199.
• Orbach, I. (2007). From abandonment to symbiosis: A developmental reversal in suicidal adolescents. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(1), 150.
• Rakipi, S. (2015).Parenting styles: TheirImpact on adolescent separation and collegeadjustment.(Unpublished Doctoral Thesis) Capella University, Minneapolis.
• Rice, K. G. (1992). Separation-individuation and adjustment to college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(2), 203.
• Roring, S.A. (2012). Attachment, negative self-schemas, and coping with separation-ındividuation during the transition to college. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis).Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000).Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68.
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
• Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4 (4), 99-104.
• Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28.
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 9(1), 13–39. doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
• Ryff, C. D., and Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Pscychology, 69(4), 720-728.
• Sabaka, S. M. (2009). Psychometric integrity of a measure of dysfunctional separation-individuatin in young adolescents.(Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Ball State University, Muncie.
• Saleem, S., & Saleem, T. (2017). Role of religiosity in psychological well-being among medical and non-medical students. Journal of religion and health, 56(4), 1180-1190.
• Sanahuja, A., & Belot, R. A. (2016). Le processus de séparation-individuation à l’adolescence à l’épreuve de l’obésité. Clinique de l’hyper-oralité. Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'Adolescence, 64(6), 402-410.
• Smedema, S. M., Chan, F., Yaghmaian, R. A., Cardoso, E. D., Muller, V., Keegan, J., ... & Ebener, D. J. (2015). The Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations and Life Satisfaction in College Students with Disabilities: Evaluation of a Mediator Model. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(3), 341-358.
• Springer, K. W., Pudrovska, T., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social science research, 40(1), 392-398.
• Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28-3), 374-384.
• Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior.
• Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006.
• Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407.
• Yahav, R., Vosburgh, J., & Miller, A. (2007). Separation-individuation processes of adolescent children of parents with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 13, 87-94.