Examining online learning motivations of university students studying via distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic by digital literacy variable

Year 2022, Volume: 30 Issue: 3, 587 - 608, 31.07.2022

Özlem Karakış

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.927496

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Purpose: A total of 422 university students participates in this study where the digital literacy of university students studying via distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic by online learning motivation variable is examined.
Methodology: In the study, Personal Information Form, Digital Literacy Scale (DLS) and Online Learning Motivation Scale (OLMS) are used. The research is structured in descriptive and relational scanning models.
Findings: According to the data obtained, it is stated that the digital literacy and online learning motivation of the students within the scope of the research is at medium level; digital literacy levels do not differ by gender and grade level; there is a statistically significant difference in online learning motivation level of students in favor of female students; on the other hand, in the score of the whole online learning motivation scale, there is a significant difference between 2nd and 4th grade students in favor of 2nd grade students and between 3rd and 4th grade students in favor of 3rd grade students; there is a moderately positive and statistically significant relationship between students’ digital literacy and online learning motivation levels and their online learning motivation and digital literacy predict each other by 21.8 %.
Highlights: Given that 21.8 % of students’ online learning motivation is interpreted by their digital literacy or vice versa, increasing the development of students’ both digital literacy and online learning motivation levels with in-school and out-of-school trainings is suggested.

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic, digital literacy, distance education, online learning motivation, university students

Examining online learning motivations of university students studying via distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic by digital literacy variable

Abstract

Purpose: A total of 422 university students participates in this study where the digital literacy of university students studying via distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic by online learning motivation variable is examined. Methodology: In the study, Personal Information Form, Digital Literacy Scale (DLS) and Online Learning Motivation Scale (OLMS) are used. The research is structured in descriptive and relational scanning models. Findings: According to the data obtained, it is stated that the digital literacy and online learning motivation of the students within the scope of the research is at medium level; digital literacy levels do not differ by gender and grade level; there is a statistically significant difference in online learning motivation level of students in favor of female students; on the other hand, in the score of the whole online learning motivation scale, there is a significant difference between 2nd and 4th grade students in favor of 2nd grade students and between 3rd and 4th grade students in favor of 3rd grade students; there is a moderately positive and statistically significant relationship between students’ digital literacy and online learning motivation levels and their online learning motivation and digital literacy predict each other by 21.8 %. Highlights: Given that 21.8 % of students’ online learning motivation is interpreted by their digital literacy or vice versa, increasing the development of students’ both digital literacy and online learning motivation levels with in-school and out-of-school trainings is suggested.

Keywords

COVID-19 pandemic, Digital literacy, Distance education, online learning motivation, University students

References

• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. (2000). The evolving relationship between general and special computer self-efficacy-An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
• Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, September, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
• Albelbisi, N., & Yusop, F. (2019). Factors influencing learners’ self-regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20, 1-16. 10.17718/tojde.598191.
• Aoki, K. (2010). The use of ICT and e-learning in higher education in Japan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 868-872.
• Arnone, M. P., & Small, R. V. (1999). Evaluating the motivational effectiveness of children’s websites. Educational Technology, 39(2), 51-55.
• Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x
• Artino Jr., A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
• de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218e231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130.
• Balcı, A. (2020). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research Methods, Techniques and Principles in Social Sciences]. Pegem Akademi [Pegem Academy]. [In Turkish]
• Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
• Bekele, T. A. (2010). Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 116-127.
• Belshaw, D.A.J. (2011). What is digital literacy? A Pragmatic investigation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Durham University. http://neverendingthesis.com/index.php/Main_Page
• Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., & Mellinger, A. E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 8(1), 60-71.
• Bozkurt, A. (2020), Koronavirüs (Covid-19) Pandemi Süreci ve Pandemi Sonrası Dünyada Eğitime Yönelik Değerlendirmeler: Yeni Normal ve Yeni Eğitim Paradigması [Coronavirus (Covid-19) Pandemic Process and Evaluations on Education in the World after the Pandemic: New Normal and New Education Paradigm]. Açık Öğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Open Education Applications and Research], 6(3), 112-142. [In Turkish]
• Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020), Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to corona virus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6.
• Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating Students to Learn (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Buckler, A., Chamberlain, L., Stutchbury, K., & Hedge, C. (2020). Minimising distance in distance learning programmes during a global health crisis: Framing an international education response to COVID-19. UKFIET, https://www.ukfiet.org/2020/minimising-distance-indistance-learning-programmes-during-a-global-health-crisis-framing-aninternational-education-response-to-covid-19/, (Retrived on: 05. 06. 2020).
• Campbell, E. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions and practices: Integrating digital literacy in English education. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Cape Town.
• Can, Ş., Çelik, B., & Çelik, C. (2020). Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyine çeşitli değişkenlerin etkisi [The effects of different variables on the digital literacy Level of Pre-Service Science Teachers]. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi [Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi], 6(3), 352-358. doi: 10.38089/ekuad.2020.33 [In Turkish]
• Carrington, V., & Robinson, M. (2009). Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices. London: SAGE Publications.
• Chen, K., & Jang, S. (2010). Motivation in online learning: testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, July, 26(4), 741-752.
• Cho, M.-H., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410802516934
• Christensen, C., Johnson, C. W., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Churchill, N., Ping, L.Ç., Oakley, G., & Churchill, D. (2008). Digital storytelling and digital literacy learning. International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education, Island. https://www.academia.edu/2818859/Digital_storytelling_and_digital_literacy_learning
• Chute, A. G., Thompson, M. M., & Hancock, B. W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning. McGraw-Hill.
• Chyung, Y., Winiecki, D. J., & Fenner, J. A. (1998). A case study: Increase enrollment by reducing dropout rates in adult distance education [Conference presentation]. Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI, United States.
• Coşkun, Y.D., Cumaoğlu, G.K., & Seçkin, H. (2013). Bilgisayar öğretmen adaylarının bilişim alanıyla ilgili okuryazarlık kavramlarına yönelik görüşleri [Computer teacher candidates’ opinions on literacy concepts related to informatics]. Internatioanal Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1259-1272. [In Turkish]
• Cote, T., & Milliner, B. (2016). Japanese university students’ self-assessment and digital literacy test results. S. Papadima-Sophocleous, In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (s. 125-131). doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.549
• Çam, E., & Kiyici, M. (2017). Perceptions of Prospective Teachers on Digital Literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 29-44.
• Çetin, O. (2016). Pedagojik formasyon programı ile lisans eğitimi fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of digital literacy levels of pre-service science teachers with pedagogical formation program]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty], 18(2), 658-685. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/286833 [In Turkish]
• Çubukçu, A., & Bayzan, Ş. (2013). Türkiye’de dijital vatandaşlık algısı ve bu algıyı internetin bilinçli, güvenli ve etkin kullanımı ile artırma yöntemleri [Perception of digital citizenship in Turkey and methods to increase this perception with conscious, safe and effective use of the internet]. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 5, 148-174. [In Turkish]
• Çukurbaşı, B., & İşman, A. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital yerli özelliklerinin incelenmesi (Bartın Üniversitesi örneği) [Investigation of pre-service teachers’ digital native features (Bartın University example)]. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Bartın University Journal of Education Faculty], Yaz [Summer], 3(1), 28-54. [In Turkish]
• Daniels, B.M. (2008). Motivation, academic success, and learning environments: Comparing high school face-to-face and online courses. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. http://ezproxy.um.edu.my:2110/pqdwebdid=1674096401&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=18803&RQT=309&VName=PQD (Retrieved on:22.01.2020).
• Dayanıklı, F. (2019). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları, sağlık okuryazarlığı ve dijital okuryazarlık arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between healthy lifestyle behaviors, health literacy and digital literacy among nursing students]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], Düzce Üniversitesi [Duzce University]. [In Turkish]
• Deryakulu, D. (2007). Seçmeli bilgisayar dersi ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algısının 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin seçmek istedikleri mesleklerle ilişkisi [The relationship between the elective computer course and the perception of computer self-efficacy with the professions that 8th grade students want to choose]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi [Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences], 40(2), 1-22.https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000146 [In Turkish]
• Dobson, T., & Willinsky, J. (2009). Digital literacy. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge University Press.
• Donohue, C. (2014). Technology and digital media as tools for teaching and learning in the digital age. In Technology and Digital Media in the Early Years (pp. 53-67). Routledge.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
• Ertaş, H., Kıraç, R., & Demir, R. H. (2019, 10-13 Ekim). Dijital Okuryazarlık ve e-sağlık okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between digital literacy and e-health literacy]. 3. Uluslararası 13. Ulusal Sağlık ve Hastane İdaresi Kongresi [3rd International 13th National Health and Hospital Management Congress], Sakarya Üniversitesi [Sakarya University], Bildiri Kitabı [Proceedings Book], 557-570. [In Turkish]
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2002). Digital literacy: A new terminology framework and its application to the design of meaningful technology-based learning environments. P. Barker, & Rebelesky, S., In Proceedings of EDMEDIA, 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, ve Telecommunication (pp. 493-498). Norfolk, NA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421-429.
• Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from “distressed” students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233-239.
• Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 7-41.
• Fryer, L., & Bovee, N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: teachers matter on and offline. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003.
• Fryer, L., Bovee, N., & Nakao, K. (2014). E-learning: Reasons students in language learning courses don’t want to. Computers & Education, 74, 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.008.
• Gao, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 367-386.
• Gay, L. R. & Airasian, P. (2000) Educational Research: competencies for analysis and application (6th edition), Prentice Hall.
• Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285e292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005.
• Gillen, J., Arnott, L., Marsh, J., Bus, A., Castro, T., Dardanou, M.,…. & Holloway, D. (2018). Digital literacy and young children: towards better understandings of the benefits and challenges of digital technologies in homes and early years settings. Policy briefing of DigiLitEY COST Action IS1410 and the Digital Childhoods SIG of the European Early Childhood Research Association.
• Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
• Gökçearaslan, Ş., & Bayır, E. A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının sayısal yetkinlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers' numerical competency levels]. 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Sunulmuş bildiri [Submitted paper], Antalya. http://www.iconte.org/ FileUpload/ks59689/File/200.pdf [In Turkish]
• Göldağ B., & Kanat S. (2018). Güzel sanatlar eğitimi alan öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık durumları [Digital literacy status of students studying fine arts]. International Journal of Social Science, 70, 77-92. [In Turkish]
• Green, M., & Sulbaran, T. (2006). Motivation assessment instrument for virtual reality scheduling simulator. In T. Reeves, & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2006 (pp. 45e50). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
• Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751
• Gürtekin, A. (2019). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Boş Zaman Tutumları ile Sosyalleşme Taktikleri ve Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi [Investigation of University Students’ Leisure Attitudes, Socialization Tactics and Digital Literacy Levels]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished Master Thesis], Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi [Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University].
• Hamutoğlu, N. B. Güngören, Ö. C., Uyanık, G. K., & Erdoğan, D. G., (2017a). Dijital Okuryazarlık Ölçeği: Türkçe’ye Uyarlama Çalışması [Digital Literacy Scale: A Study for Adapting to Turkish]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(1): 408-429. [In Turkish]
• __________(2017b, 18-21 May). Öğretmen adaylarının web 2.0 araçlarını kullanma sıklıkları ile dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ frequency of using web 2.0 tools and their digital literacy level]. ERPA International Congresses on Education, Macaristan [Hungary], Özetler Kitabı [Proceedings Book], Sakarya: Edugarden, 57-63. [In Turkish]
• Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a Web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557-579.
• Hartley, K. W. (1999). Media overload in instructional Web pages and the impact on learning. Educational Media International, 36(2), 145-150.
• Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37-64.
• Horne, J. (2007). Gender Differences in Computerised and Conventional Educational Tests. The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 47-55.
• Hoskins, S. L., & van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 177- 192.
• Hu, L-t. & Bentler, P. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
• Hudson, L., McCloud, R., Buhler, T., Cramer, S., Greer, L., & Paugh, R. (1998). Supporting adult students in Web-based courses: Real examples for serving nontraditional, adult, and minority students. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Adult Learner, Richmond, VA.
• Ihmeideh, F., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2017). Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of the role of technology and digital media in developing child culture in the early years. Children and Youth Services Review, 77, 139-146.
• İşçioğlu, E., & Kocakuşak, S. (2012). İlköğretim sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sayısal okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve teknoloji algıları [Digital literacy levels and technology perceptions of primary school teacher candidates]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty], 2, 15-24. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yönetim/icerik/makaleler/630- published.pdf [In Turkish]
• Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2007). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice (pp. 190-202). Routledge.
• Joo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
• Junio, D.R. (2020). Digital divide in the time of COVID-19. United Nations University. https://cs.unu.edu/news/news/digital-divide-covid-19.html, (Retrived on:15.04.2020).
• Karabacak, Z. İ., & Sezgin, A. A. (2019). Türkiye’de dijital dönüşüm ve dijital okuryazarlık [Digital conversion and digital literacy in Turkey]. Türk İdare Dergisi [Turkish Administrative Journal], 488, 319-343. [In Turkish]
• Karakış, Ö. (2014). Lise Öğrencilerinin İngilizce Dersine Yönelik Kaygıları, Motivasyonları, Öz-Yeterlik Algıları ve İngilizce Ders Başarıları Arasındaki İlişki [The Relationship Between High School Students’ Anxiety, Motivation, Self-Efficacy Perceptions and English Course Success]. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation], Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi [Abant İzzet Baysal University]. [In Turkish]
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayıncılık [Nobel Publishing].
• Keller, J. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 6(2), 79-104.
• Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
• Khalid, M. S., Slættalíð, T., Parveen, M., & Hossain, M. S. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis ofteachers’ development of digital literacy. In E. K. Sorensen, A. Szucs, & M. S. Khalid (Eds.), Proceedings of the1th D4|Learning international Conference Innovations in Digital Learning for Inclusion (D4Learning, 2015) (pp.136-144). Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
• Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Information Science Publishing.
• Kim, K-J., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-23. doi: 10.2190/EC.44.1.a
• Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(01), 12-24.
• Knowles, E. & Kirkman, D. (2007). An investigation of students attitude and motivation toward online learning. InSight: A Collection of Faculty Scholarship, 2, 70-80. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ864281.pdf
• Knutsson, O., Blåsjö, M., Hållsten, S., & Karlström, P. (2012). Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 237-246.
• Korkmaz, Ö., & Mahiroğlu, A. (2009). Üniversiteyi yeni kazanmış öğrencilerin bilgisayar okuryazarlık düzeyleri [Computer literacy levels of newly admitted university students]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Kastamonu Journal of Education], 17, 983-1000. [In Turkish]
• Korkut, E., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2008). Yabancı dil öğretmen adaylarının bilgi ve bilgisayar okuryazarlık öz yeterlikleri [Information and computer literacy self-efficacy of foreign language teacher candidates]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Educational Sciences], 34, 178-188. [In Turkish]
• Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R. & Tan, S. S. (2015). Öğrencilerin e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk ve memnuniyet düzeylerinin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of students’ e-learning readiness and satisfaction levels on academic achievement]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD) [Journal of Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Education Faculty], Aralık [December], 16 (3), 219-241. [In Turkish]
• Kozan, M. (2018). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi bölümü öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Examination of digital literacy levels and sensitivity towards cyberbullying of pre-service teachers of computer and instructional technologies education department]. Yayınlanamamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], Fırat Üniversitesi [Fırat University], Elazığ. [In Turkish]
• Kozan, M., & Özek, M. B. (2019). BÖTE bölümü öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Examining the digital literacy levels of pre-service ICT department teachers and their sensitivity towards cyber bullying]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences], 29(1): 107-120. [In Turkish]
• Kuru, E. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık kavramına ilişkin görüşleri [Social studies teacher candidates’ views on the concept of digital literacy]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(3), 1629-1648. [In Turkish]
• Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41-51. Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International, 41(2), 163-173.
• López-Pérez, V., Pérez-López, C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
• Marakas, M. Y. & R. Johnson, R. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for reason. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163. doi: 10.1287/isre.9.2.126
• Markauskaite, L. (2005). Exploring differences in trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: Does gender matter. (Retrieved on: 07.03.2021)
• Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2017). Young children’s initiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(1), 47-60.
• Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit – a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of e-Literacy, 2(2), 130-136.
• ________(2008). Digital Literacy and the Digital Society. In C. Lankshear, M. Knobel (Eds.), In Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices (pp.151-174), Peter Lang.
• McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology (pp. 403-437). Macmillan Library Reference.
• Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the online technologies self-efficacy scale (OTSES), ED 445 672, 10p. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445672.pdf
• Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48. doi: 10.1080/01587910500081269
• Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7949.
• Nasah, A., DacCosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Education Technology Research Development, 58, 531-555. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9151-8.
• Ng, W. (2012) Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016.
• Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık öz-yeterlilik becerilerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [An analysis of pre-service teachers’ digital literacy self-efficacy skills in terms of different variables]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences], 21 (1), 129-147. doi: 10.32709/akusosbil.466549 [In Turkish]
• Onyema E. M., Eucheria N. C., Obafemi F. A., Sen S., Atonye F. G., Sharma A., & Alsayed A. O. (2020), Impact of coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108-121.
• Özbaşı, D., Cevahir, H., & Özdemir, M. (2018). Çevrimiçi öğrenme motivasyon ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the online learning motivation scale to Turkish: validity and reliability study]. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty], Ocak [January], 8(2), 352-368. [In Turkish]
• Özerbaş, M. A., & Kuralbayeva, A. (2018). Türkiye ve Kazakistan öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of digital literacy levels of Turkish and Kazakhstan teacher candidates]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Education], 5(1),16-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.314761
• Özoğlu, C. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenmeleri ve dijital okuryazarlıkları arasındaki ilişki (Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği) [Relationship between teacher candidates' lifelong learning and digital literacy (Anadolu University Faculty of Education Example)]. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], Anadolu Üniversitesi [Anatolian University], Eskişehir. [In Turkish]
• Öztürk, Y., & Budak, Y. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının kendilerine yönelik dijital okuryazarlık değerlendirmelerinin incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers’ digital literacy assessments]. Kesit Akademi Dergisi [Kesit Academy Journal], Aralık [December], 5(21), 156-172. [In Turkish] Pew Research Center (2005). Trends 2005. Pew Research Center.
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall Merrill.
• Polat, S. (2018). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi [An Investigation of Digital Literacy Levels of Social Studies Teacher Candidates in Terms of Different Variables]. In H. Şahin, A. Temizer & M. Premovic (Eds.) Eğitim Bilimlerinde Akademik Çalışmalar [Academic Studies in Educational Sciences], (pp.75-93). ISBN • 978-9940-540-38-8 [In Turkish]
• Rambousek, V., Štípek, J., & Vaňková, P. (2016). Contents of Digital Literacy from the Perspective of Teachers and Pupils. Future Academy®’s Multidisciplinary Conference, 354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.slavinsbspro.2016.02.101
• Ramírez-Correa P.E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Rondán-Cataluña, F.J. (2015) Gender and acceptance of e-learning: A multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0140460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140460.
• Reinhart, J. (1999). Student motivation, self-efficacy and task difficulty in Web-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
• Rodgers, D. L., & Withrow-Thorton, B. J. (2005). The effect of instructional media on learner motivation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 333-340.
• Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.03.001
• Rovai, A. P., Ponton, M., Wighting, M., & Baker, J. (2007). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and e-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 413-432.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Sakal, M. (2020, 9-11 Aralık). Dijital yerlilerin dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri [Digital literacy levels of digital natives]. 7. Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Konferansı. Sağlık Bilişimi ve Analitiği [7th International Management Information Systems Conference. Health Informatics and Analytics]. Bakırçay Üniversitesi [Bakırçay University], İzmir, Türkiye. [In Turkish]
• Sarıkaya, B. (2019). Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık durumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of digital literacy status of Turkish teacher candidates in terms of various variables]. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [International Journal of Social Research], 12(62), 1098- 1107. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3122 [In Turkish]
• Schramm, R. M., Wagner, R. J., & Werner, J. M. (2000). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of web-based courses. Distance Education Report, 4(18), 1-3.
• Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D. R., & Coombes, J. (2008). Assessing individual-level factors supporting student intrinsic motivation in online discussions: A qualitative study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 111-125.
• Shroff, R. H., & Vogel, D. R. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 59-85.
• Small, R. V. (1997). Assessing the motivational quality of World Wide Websites. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
• Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70.
• Spires, H, A., Paul, C, M., & Kerkhoff, S, N. (2018). Digital literacy for the 21st century. In Pour, M, K. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of information science and technology, 4th edition. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch194
• Styer, A. J. (2007). A grounded meta-analysis of adult learner motivation in online learning from the perspective of the learner. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3249903)
• Sulak, S. E. (2019). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of digital literacy scale: validity and reliability study]. Social Scıences Studies Journal, 5(31), 1329-1342. [In Turkish]
• Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M. & Pelz, W. E. (2000). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. In: Proceedings of WebNet 2000 world conference on the WWW and Internet, San Antonio, TX.
• Svensson, M., & Baelo, R. (2015). Teacher students’ perceptions of their digital competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1527-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.302
• Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, K.S. (2001). Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Pearson Education.
• Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2): 215-221.
• Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S., & Tsai, M. J. (2001). Developing an internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers and Education, 37(1), 41-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00033-1
• TÜİK (2018). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Araştırma Sonuçları [Household Information Technology Usage Research Results]. http://tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2602 [In Turkish]
• ________(2020). Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Araştırma Sonuçları [Household Information Technology Usage Research Results]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2020-33679 [In Turkish]
• Tyger, R. L. (2011). Teacher candidates’ digital literacy and their technology integration efficacy. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 557. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/557
• Ucar, H. & Kumtepe, A.T. (2019). Be motivated and motivate: Interview with John M. Keller. e-Learn Magazine. https://elearnmag.acm.org/archive.cfm?aid=3331178, (Retrieved on: 07.03.2021).
• Üstündağ, M. T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması ve fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık durumları [Adapting the digital literacy scale to Turkish and digital literacy status of pre-service science teachers]. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19-29. [In Turkish]
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017.
• Visser, L., Plomp, T., & Kuiper, W. (1999). Development research applied to improve motivation in distance education. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
• We Are Social & Hootsuite (2017). Digital in 2017 global overview. https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-in-2017-globaloverview, (Retrieved on: 21.12.2020).
• WHO, (2020a). https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov (Retrived on: 12.12.2020)
• WHO, (2020b). https://covid19.who.int/ (Retrived on: 12.12.2020)
• Wighting, M. J., Liu, J., & Rovai, A. P. (2008). Distinguishing sense of community and motivation characteristics between online and traditional college students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 285-295.
• Witten, N. A., & Humphry, J. (2018). The Electronic Health Literacy and Utilization of Technology for Health in a Remote Hawaiian Community: Lana’i. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health, March, 77(3): 51–59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845020/ (Retrieved on: 16.03.2021).
• Yaman, C. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi (Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Örneği) [Investigation of digital literacy levels of social studies teacher candidates (Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Example)]. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished Master's Thesis], Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi [Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University], Niğde. [In Turkish]
• Yılmaz, A., Kaya, M., Akca, N., & Sönmez, S. (2019, 10-13 Ekim). Sağlık bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of digital literacy levels of health sciences faculty students]. 3. Uluslararası 13. Ulusal Sağlık ve Hastane İdaresi Kongresi [3rd International 13th National Health and Hospital Administration Congress], Sakarya Üniversitesi [Sakarya University], Bildiri Kitabı [Proceedings Book], 287-297. [In Turkish]
• Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431-449. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
• Yontar, A. (2019). Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri [Digital Literacy Levels of Teacher Candidates]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi [Journal of Mother Tongue Education], 7(4), 815-824. [In Turkish]
• YÖK, (2019). Üniversitelerde 30 Bin Öğrenciye “Dijital Okuryazarlık” Dersi. https://basin.yok.gov.tr/InternetHaberleriBelgeleri/%C4%B0nternet%20Haber%20Belgeleri/2019/112_univ_dijital_okuryazarlik_dersi.pdf [In Turkish]
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001
• https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov (Retrieved on: 12.12.2020)
• https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=bilgi-teknolojileri-ve-bilgi-toplumu-102&dil=1 (Retrieved on: 27.02.2021)
• http://uis.unesco.org/ (Retrieved on: 26.10.2020)
• https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=bilgi-teknolojileri-ve-bilgi-toplumu-102&dil=1 (Erişim tarihi: 27.02.2021)
• http://uis.unesco.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 26.10.2020)