Savunma Tedarik Proje Yönetiminde Entegre Proje Ekiplerinin Kullanımına Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi

Yıl 2021, , 211 - 248, 12.04.2021

Mustafa Kemal Topcu

https://doi.org/10.17134/khosbd.913768

Cited By: 5

Öz

Tedarik projelerinin belirlenen performans kriterlerine zamanında ve hedeflenen maliyet sınırları içerisinde ulaşabilmesi için etkin ve başarılı bir proje yönetimi anlayışına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Başta savunma, havacılık ve uzay sanayi gibi uzun vadeli karmaşık sistem tedarikinde entegre proje ekiplerinin kullanılması söz konusu riskleri azaltmanın bir yöntemi olabilir. Ancak kullanıcı ihtiyaçları, yüklenici pozisyonu, ekonomi ve teknoloji gibi belirsizliklerin yoğun olduğu, mali, teknik ve takvim açısından risk yönetiminin ön planda tutulduğu savunma sektöründe entegre proje ekiplerinin kullanılmasına yönelik çalışmalar yetersiz, hatta yok denecek kadar azdır. Alanyazındaki bu yetersizliğe vurgu yapmak ve gelişen savunma sektöründe entegre proje ekiplerinin kullanılmasına katkıda bulunmak maksadıyla hazırlanan bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de entegre proje ekiplerin kullanımına yönelik bir model önerisi sunmak olarak belirlenmiştir. Özgün teknolojik savunma sistemine sahip olmak isteyen Türkiye açısından ekosistemdeki tüm aktörlerin teknoloji ve iş yapış tarzının sinerji yaratacak şekilde bir araya getirilmesi çalışmanın önemini artırmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de savunma tedarik projelerinde kullanılabilecek örnek bir entegre proje ekip yapısı, ekibin oluşum aşamaları, çalışma talimatı ve kontrol listesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entegre Proje Ekibi, EPE, Proje Yönetimi, Savunma Tedariki

A Model Proposal for Employıng Integrated Project Teams in Project Management in Defense Acquisition

Öz

It is of great necessity of project management concept to complete acquisition projects within identified performance criteria in compliance with time and cost targets. Employing integrated project teams may be a tool to mitigate mentioned risks in acquisition of long-term complex systems in particularly defense, aviation, and space sector. However, there is a scant literature on employment of integrated project teams in defense sector whereby uncertainties due to user requirements, supplier position, economy and technology are confronted and risk management regarding finance, technic, and schedule are attached great significance. This study, which is prepared to highlight the need and contribute to the use of integrated project teams in developing defense sector, aims to propose a model regarding employing integrated project teams in Turkey. Gathering know-how and technology of the actors in ecosystem to create synergy on behalf of Turkey, aiming to have indigenous defense technology, promotes the significance of the study. To this end, this study proposes an integrated project team organizational chart, team formation phases, operational procedures, and a checklist to be employed in defense acquisition projects in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Integrated Project Team, IPT, Project Management

Kaynakça

• Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1988). Dynamic Manufacturing. The Free Press Division, Macmillan Inc, Collier Macmillan Pub.
• İngiltere Savunma Bakanlığı (2005). Defence Industrial Strategy: Defence White Paper. London: HMSO .
• İstanbul Sanayi Odası (2009). Proje Yönetimi Kılavuzu. İSO Yayın No: 2009/24, İstanbul.
• Mawdsley, J. (2015). France, the UK and the EDA. In: N. Karampekios and I. Oiknomou, eds. The European Defence Agency. Arming Europe. London: Routledge, 139–154.
• PMI (2013). Proje Yönetimi Bilgi Birikimi Kılavuzu (PMBOK® Kılavuzu) Altıncı Baskı. İstanbul: PMI TR.
• Bahill, A.T. and Gissing, B. (1998). Re-Evaluating Systems Engineering Concepts Using Systems Thinking. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews. 28(4), 516–527.
• Bochenek, G.M. and Ragusa, J.M. (2004). Improving Integrated Project Team Interaction through Virtual Collaboration. Engineering Management Journal, 16(2), 3-12.
• Boehm, B. and Hansen, W.J. (2001). The Spiral Model as a Tool for Evolutionary Acquisition. Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 14(5), 4-11.
• Buchanan, D. A. (1991). Vulnerability and Agenda: Context and Process in Program Management. British Journal of Management, 2, 121-132.
• Calcara, A. (2017). State–defence industry relations in the European context: French and UK interactions with the European Defence Agency. European Security, 26(4), 527-551.
• Carman, K.R. (2009). Building Championship Teams. Contract Management, 49(10), 42-51.
• Cohee, G. L., Barrows, J. and Handfield, R. (2019). Early supplier integration in the US defense industry. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 3 (1), 2-28.
• Cook, N. (1998). Smart Moves. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 9 September, 36-38.
• Dwivedi, S. N. and Kumbakonam, A. (2002). Effective Team Building Process and Team Leadership for Integrated Product and Process Development. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 2(3/4), 415-435.
• Erridge, A. and Nondi, R. (1994). Public Procurement, Competition and Partnership, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 1(3), 169-79.
• Erridge, A. and Greer, J. (2000). Policy Network Analysis of UK Central Government Civil Procurement. Public Policy and Administration, 15(4), 25-49.
• Fleming, Q. W. and Koppelman, J. M. (1996). Integrated project development teams: another fad… or a permanent change. International Journal of Project Management, 14(3), 163-168.
• Ford, R. and McLoughlin, F. (1992). Successful Project Teams: A study of MIS Managers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(4), 312- 317.
• Gadeken, O.C. (2005). PM Leadership: Seven Keys to Success. Defense AT&L, January-February, 10-12.
• Galloway, I. (1998). Private finance comes of age. Defence Procurement Analysis, Autumn, 17-19.
• Gove, R. and Uzdzinski, J. (2013). A performance-based system maturity assessment framework. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 688-697.
• Guo, Q., Li, T. and Yang, X. (2008). Research on requirements generation process of army weapon equipment, Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2, 10-13.
• Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Nixon, R.D. (1993). A Mid-Range Theory of Interfunctional Integration, Its Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 10, 161-185
• Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M. and Doll, W. (2001). Concurrent engineering and its consequences. Journal of operations management, 19(1), 97-115.
• Liu, W.W., Liu, F.S., Xu, D. and Zhang, Q. (2012). Analysis of joint capabilities integration and development system of US ARMY. IEEE: International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, 1349-1353.
• Moore, D.M. and Antill, P.D. (2001). Integrated Project Teams: the way forward for UK defence procurement. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(3), 179-185.
• Mortlock, R.F. (2020). Studying Acquisition Strategy Formulation of Incremental Development Approaches. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 27(3), 264-311.
• Müslüm, S., Topcu, M.K. ve Mala, M. (2010). Savunma Tedarikinde Güncel Yaklaşımlar: Evrimsel Tedarik Stratejisi ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 91-115.
• Pane Haden, S.S., Humphreys, J.H., Cooke, J. and Penland, P. (2012). Applying Taylor’s Principles to Teams: Renewing a Century-Old Theory. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(4), 11-20.
• Pinheiro, B. A. (2010). How Do Managers Control Technology-Intensive Work? Journal of Technology Management&Innovation, 5(2), 1-12.
• Rahman, M.M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (2008). Relational Contracting and Teambuildings: Assessing Potential Contractual and Non-Contractual Incentives. Journal of Management in Engineering, January, 48-63.
• Sanderson, J. (2009). Buyer‐supplier partnering in UK defence procurement: looking beyond the policy rhetoric. Public Administration, 87(2), 327-350.
• Söderlund, J. and Bredin, K. (2006). HRM in Project-Intensive Firms: Changes and Challenges. Human Resource Management, 45(2), 249-265.
• Topcu, M.K., Mala, M. and Müslüm, S. (2015). A Study on Defense Acquısıtıon Models with an Emerging Market Perspective. The Case of Turkey. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 6(2), 95-102.
• Turk, W. (2006a). The Five P’s in Project Management. Defense AT&L, July-August, 22-25.
• Turk, W. (2006b). Seven Deadly Sins of Project Management. Defense AT&L: January-February, 24-27.
• Turk, W. (2007), 21st Century Project Management Competencies. Defense AT&L, January-Februray, 22-25.
• Valdez, R. ve Kleiner, B.H. (1996). How to Build Teamwork in the Defence Industry. Team Performance Management, 2(2), 41-48.
• Winn, M. T. (2006). Reduce Program Confusion Through an Integrated Product/Program Team. Contract Management, 46(10), 36-41.
• Zakarian, A. and Kusiak, A. (1999). Forming teams: an analytical approach. IIE Transactions, 31(1), 85-97.
• Zittel, R. (2001). The Reality of Simulation-based Acquisition and an Example of U.S. Military Implementation. Acquisition Review Quarterly, Summer, 121-132.
• Ellman, J. E. (2009). The Role of Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in the Failure of the Army's Future Combat System. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
• Bochenek, G. M. and Ragusa, J. M. (2003). Virtual (3D) collaborative environments: An improved environment for integrated product team interaction? Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Hawaii, ABD.
• Cook, S.C., Nowakowski, S. and Unewisse, M. (2013). Towards an SoS Engineering Approach for Integrating Australian Defence Force Capabilities. Proceedings of Systems Engineering Test and Evaluation Conference, Systems Engineering Society of Australia.
• Gross, D.C., Tucker, W.V. and Cameron, S.E. (2007). Whatever happened to Simulation Based Acquisition? Simulation Tecchnology Conference.
• Korkmazyürek, H. (2004). Savunma Tedarikinde Reform Stratejisi: Proje Yönetimi Açısından Bir Bakış. 12’nci Ulusal Yönetim-Organizasyon Kongresi, 27-29 Mayıs 2004, Bursa, 212-218.
• Ullah, I., Tang, D. and Yin, L. (2015). Engineering Change Implications on Product Design: A Review of the Literature. International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT-15), Atlantis Press, Tianjin, 1679-1691.
• Hollier, W. and Beckett, P. (2002). Simulation-Based Acquisition: Architecture and Implementation – Part 1. SimTecT 2002. 02.01.2020 tarihinde http://www.siaa.asn.au/get/2395361789.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Fox, J.R. (2011). Defense acquisition reform, 1960–2009: An elusive goal. Center of Military History. 12.11.2019 tarihinde https://history.army.mil/html/books/051/51-3-1/index.html adresinden alınmıştır.
• ABD Enerji Bakanlığı (2012). Integrated Project Team: Guide for Formation and Implementation, DOE G 413.3-18A. ABD: Washington DC.
• ABD Hava Kuvvetleri Malzeme Komutanlığı (1993). Guide on Integrated Product Development, Air Force Material Command. ABD.
• ABD Savunma Bakanlığı (1996). Guide to Integrated Product and Process Development, Version 1.0, ABD: Washington, DC.
• ABD Savunma Bakanlığı (2007). Instruction 5000.2: Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. ABD: Washington, DC.
• Hughes Aircraft Company (1994). Integrated Product Development, Hughes Guide to Using Integrated Product Teams, Hughes Surface Systems.
• MITRE (2008). Integrated Project Team (IPT) Start-up Guide. Tracking Number: 08-1645. ABD: Massachusetts.
• NASA (2017), NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, SP-2016-6105 Rev2., 12th Media Services, https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_ systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf.
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics. (2007). The Defense Acquisition System (DoDD 5000.01). http://www.acqnotes.com/Attachments/DoD%20Directive%205000.01.pdf
• Aldridge, E.C., Jr. (2002). Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development, Memorandum, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD[AT&L]), Washington, D.C.
• Coble, M., Royster, J., Glandon, G., Stewart, J., Pham, P., Taylor, B., Bailey, D. and Herndon, K. (2014). Improving the Prototyping Process in Department of Defense Acquisition. Systems Engineerıng Capstone Project Report, Monterey, California.
• Darnis, J. P., Gasparini, G., Grams, C., Keohane, D., Liberti, F., Maulny, J. P. and Stumbaum, M. B. (2007). Lessons learned from European defence equipment programmes. Occasional Paper: 69. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
• Grasso, V. B. (2010). Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs)-Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700. Washington, D.C.
• İngiltere Sayıştay (2005). Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report. London: HMSO.
• Kirkpartick, D. (2003). A UK Perspective on Defence Equipment Acquisition. Institution of Defence and Strategic Studies, Working Paper, No: 41, Singapore.
• McKinsey and Company (1998). Transforming the UK’s Defence Procurement System. Final Report, 20 February.
• Menker, L. J. (1990). Results of the aeronautical systems division critical process team on integrated product development (No.ASD-TR-90-5014). Aeronautical Systems Dvision Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, ABD.
• Office of Government Commerce (OGC) (2007). The Integrated Project Team: Teamworking and Partnering-Achieving Excellence in Construction Procurement Guide, OGC Yayınları.