USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN

Banu İlal; Gülden Erkut

TR EN

HARRAN'DA SULAMA İŞLETMESİ MODELLERİNE İLİŞKİN KULLANICI TERCİHLERİ

Abstract

Türkiye'de sulama hizmetlerinin merkezi yapıdan yerel yönetime devri süreci, 1994 yılında Harran'da pilot proje olarak Sulama Birlikleri'nin (SB) kurulmasıyla başlamıştır. Maliyetleri düşürmenin yanı sıra; kullanıcılar tarafından yürütülen demokratik, yerel ve katılımcı sulama işletmesi, Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (GAP) Master Planı'nda, bölgeye hakim olan aşiret temelli, hiyerarşik yapıda ki geleneksel üretim ilişkilerini modernize ederek çiftçiler arasındaki ciddi gelir eşitsizliklerini gidermenin bir aracı olarak benimsenmiştir. Ancak; yerel seçkinlerin kontrolü ele geçirmesi (elite capture), artan yolsuzluklar ve bütçe açıkları karşısında, 2018 yılında yayımlanan 7139 sayılı kanunla SB'lerinin yönetimleri Devlet Su İşleri'ne (DSİ) devredilmiştir. Bu süreçte, sulama işletmesinin tamamen özelleştirilmesi konusu literatürde yaygınlaşmaya ve bir ihtimal olarak öne çıkmaya başlamıştır. Bu makale, Harran'daki çiftçilerin devlet, kullanıcılar veya özel sektör tarafından işletilen sulama modelleri arasındaki tercihlerini ortaya koymaktadır. İlk anket çalışması, idari sorunları gidermek amacıyla yürürlüğe konulan 6172 sayılı Sulama Birlikleri Kanunu'nun uygulamaya girdiği 2013 yılında gerçekleştirilmiştir. İkinci anket ise, SB'lerin idari görevlerinin DSİ'ye devredilmesini takiben 2019 yılında yapılmıştır. Her iki ankette de çiftçiler devlet işletilmesindeki sulama modelini güçlü bir şekilde tercih etmiş; kullanıcılar arasındaki dengesiz güç ilişkileri ise bu tercihin altında yatan temel neden olarak öne çıkmıştır.

Keywords

USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN

Abstract

State-wide decentralization of irrigation began in Türkiye in 1994 with the establishment of water user associations (WUA) in Harran as pilot projects. Besides cutting down costs, democratic, local, participatory irrigation management by users was embraced in the Master Plan of the South Eastern Anatolia Project as a vehicle for ameliorating severe income disparities among farmers by modernizing the clan (aşiret) based, hierarchical, traditional production relations dominating the region. However, in response to elite capture, mounting corruption and budget deficits, Law # 7139 legislated in 2018 returned WUA administration to the State Hydraulic Works (SHW). In the meanwhile, total privatization of irrigation management has emerged as a theme in the literature and a possibility for the future. Therefore, this paper presents Harran farmers’ preferences between state, user and private sector managed irrigation models. The first survey was held in 2013, after implementation of the Water User Associations Law #6172, introduced to remedy administrative problems. The latter survey was conducted in 2019, following the return of WUAs’ administrative duties to the SHW. In both surveys, farmers have displayed strong preference for state managed irrigation while the skewed power relations among users have been indicative of the underlying reason.

Keywords

References

Agrawal, A., Ribot J. (2014). Are Ostrom’s Design Principles Sufficient for Design? Policy Matters. Issue 19. pp. 111-7.
Aydoğdu, M., Mancı, A., & Aydoğdu, M. (2015). Tarımsal su yönetiminde değişimler; sulama birlikleri, fiyatlandırma ve özelleştirme süreci. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.82927.
Baran, E. A. (1996). Sulama Birlikleri kuruluş görev ve sorunları. Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü (TODAİE) Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
FAO AQUASTAT. (2025). Water Data Snapshot.
GAP Authority. (1989) Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi (GAP) Master Planı.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
High Court of Accounts (2014). Report on Water User Associations in Turkey, 2014
Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. (2008) Decentralization and Democratization: The Case of Water User Associations In Turkey, Doctoral Thesis, Department of Political Science, McGill University.

Kadirbeyoğlu, Z., & Kurtiç, E. (2013). Problems and prospects for genuine participation in water governance in Turkey. In J. Goldin, L. Harris, & C. Sneddon (Eds.), Contemporary Water Governance in the Global South: Scarcity, Marketization and Participation (pp. 195–211). Routledge.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763.
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952530.
Özbek, Y. (2001). Şanlıurfa ve Harran Ovalarına Hizmet Götürmede Karşılaşılan Sorunlar, Çözüme İlişkin Öneriler, GAP-İBY Projesi ve Yürütülen Çalışmalar, GAP II. Agriculture Congress, Harran University
Özerol, G. (2013). Institutions of Farmer Participation and Environmental Sustainability: A Multi-level Analysis from Irrigation Management in Harran Plain, Turkey. International Journal of the Commons Vol.7(1) pp.73-91.
Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute
Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A. & Larson, A. (2006). Decentralization/Recentralization: How national governments maintain control over forest resources. World Development 34(11), pp. 1864-86.
Ribot, J. C. (2007). Representation, Citizenship and the Public Domain in Democratic Decentralization. Development. Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 43-49.
Şanlıurfa Governor’s Office. (2001). Report on Harran Water User Associations.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architecture (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Banu İlal ^*
0009-0008-7842-6665
Türkiye

Gülden Erkut
0000-0001-5553-7751
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 24, 2026

Submission Date

July 30, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 21, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 5 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

İlal, B., & Erkut, G. (2026). USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN. Karesi Journal of Architecture, 5(1). https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK

AMA

1.İlal B, Erkut G. USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN. KJA. 2026;5(1). https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK

Chicago

İlal, Banu, and Gülden Erkut. 2026. “USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN”. Karesi Journal of Architecture 5 (1). https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK.

EndNote

İlal B, Erkut G (August 1, 2026) USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN. Karesi Journal of Architecture 5 1

IEEE

[1]B. İlal and G. Erkut, “USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN”, KJA, vol. 5, no. 1, Aug. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK

ISNAD

İlal, Banu - Erkut, Gülden. “USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN”. Karesi Journal of Architecture 5/1 (August 1, 2026). https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK.

JAMA

1.İlal B, Erkut G. USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN. KJA. 2026;5. Available at https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK.

MLA

İlal, Banu, and Gülden Erkut. “USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN”. Karesi Journal of Architecture, vol. 5, no. 1, Aug. 2026, https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK.

Vancouver

1.Banu İlal, Gülden Erkut. USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN. KJA [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 1;5(1). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA43NE25TK

KARESİ Journal of Architecture is an open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal aiming at the free circulation and distribution of information. It is an electronic journal since 2022,e-published twice a year, in June and December. The publication language of the journal is Turkish and English. The subjects covered in the journal are from the fields of architecture, city and regional planning, urban design, landscape architecture, industrial product design, building physics, sustainability, cultural heritage, and social science studies related to these fields. The works in the journal are expected to be original and scientific research studies with international originality, whose contribution to the relevant literature has been proven by qualitative, experimental and analytical methods.

The journal is open access, there is no charge for submitting articles, article transactions and publication. The published issues can be accessed free of charge from the web page of the magazine.

Articles such as criticism, evaluation and compilation articles, case studies, technical reports and notes, letters to the editor, discussions, competition criticisms and analysis studies are also accepted in the journal, with priority being given to original research articles in the mentioned fields. In addition, special files consisting of works selected from the papers presented in congresses organized in all fields of architecture and design will be included.

KARESİ Journal of Architecture is open to contributions to the publications produced in the specified fields of interest. The articles in the journal are expected to confront current issues in the above mentioned fields and to encourage scientific discussions on related issues.

The articles submitted for publication in the journal are reviewed and evaluated by double-blind refereeing method after the editorial preliminary review. The forms required for all articles can be obtained from the journal web page.

In addition to current issues, theory, design, planning and application studies in the fields of architecture, design, city and regional planning, urban planning, landscape architecture, industrial product design, building physics, sustainability and cultural heritage, studies prepared on the basis of social sciences related to these fields are also included. gives. The works in the journal are expected to be original and scientific research studies that have international originality and whose contribution to the relevant literature has been proven by qualitative, experimental and analytical methods.

Author Guidelines

Articles must be prepared in accordance with the following guidelines.

The manuscript must be submitted in accordance with the journal template. Click here to access the template.

Manuscripts: Including the abstract, extended abstract, figure and table captions, and references, manuscripts must not exceed 25 pages and 8,000 (eight thousand) words. Manuscripts must be uploaded to the DergiPark system in Microsoft Word format.

Figures and Illustrations: The naming of figures within the manuscript must comply with the rules specified for figures and tables. The Editorial Board reserves the right to request replacement of technically inadequate or low-quality image files or to remove them entirely from the manuscript. The author(s) are responsible for the quality of the images used as references and for obtaining permission for their publication.

Citations and References: References must follow the APA Style, 7th Edition. For detailed information on APA referencing, please refer to:

https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples

https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-examples.pdf

https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf

https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/basic-principles/author-date

References: At the end of the manuscript, references must be listed alphabetically by the authors' surnames in accordance with the examples provided below. For the APA Style guide, please refer to:

https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-examples.pdf

Submission of Manuscripts

Manuscripts prepared in accordance with the above principles and formatting guidelines must be submitted through the DergiPark system using the prescribed template.

Manuscripts returned to the authors for revision and/or improvement following the preliminary review and peer-review process must be revised accordingly and resubmitted to the journal within one month.

The journal accepts manuscripts written in Turkish and English. Depending on the language of the manuscript, an abstract in the second language is also required. To ensure wider dissemination of published studies, an Extended Summary is mandatory for all manuscripts. The Extended Summary is intended to improve the international visibility and citation potential of the articles. For manuscripts written in Turkish, the Extended Summary must be prepared in English; for manuscripts written in English, it must be prepared in Turkish. The Extended Summary should not exceed two pages (approximately 500–750 words) and should clearly present the purpose, research problem, methodology, findings, and conclusions of the study under appropriate subheadings. The subheadings may vary depending on the nature of the study.

The Copyright Transfer and Author Agreement Form must be completed with the names and signatures of all authors and uploaded to the DergiPark system. The agreement and copyright form can be downloaded from the relevant link below. A scanned copy bearing the original (wet) signatures of all authors is acceptable.

Copyright Form

After Acceptance

Authors of manuscripts accepted for publication will be notified via e-mail. Following acceptance, the editorial office will contact the authors regarding the requirements for preparing the manuscript for publication, and authors are expected to complete these requirements promptly. The responsibility for correcting any deficiencies or issues identified at this stage rests with the author(s).

After the typesetting process has been completed, the manuscript will be sent to the corresponding author for final review and approval. At this stage, only formatting-related revisions are permitted. If the author considers a content revision to be essential, the Editor reserves the right to resubmit the manuscript for peer review.

Contact Information

During the publication process, the status of the manuscript can be monitored through the DergiPark system. Authors may also contact the journal via the e-mail addresses and contact form provided on the journal's website.

ETHICS AND PUBLICATION POLICY
KARESİ Architecture of Journal has adopted the rules of universal publication principles. In the studies prepared within the framework of scientific and international rules; all components of the publication process (publishers, editors, authors, referees and readers) must comply with ethical principles.

These ethical principles have been prepared in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive (https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Kurumsal/mevzuat/bilimsel-arastirma-ve-etik-yonetmeligi. aspx) prepared by the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE/Committee on Publication Ethics) (https://publicationethics.org/) and published in open access.

ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
1. The author(s) must not submit a work published or submitted for publication in another publication to the Journal of Architecture.

2. The works submitted by the author(s) must be original. The author(s) should accurately refer to and quote the sources they used during the writing of the article in accordance with ethical principles. In addition, it is the author's responsibility to obtain copyright permission when necessary for visual materials.

3. Situations and relationships that may constitute a conflict of interest/unity of interest regarding the works submitted for publication should be explained.

4. Persons who do not contribute to the content in the creation of the study should not be mentioned as authors. It should not be suggested to change the order of authors, to remove and/or to add authors of a study submitted for publication, to remove or add authors.

5. Information, explanation or raw data about their articles can be requested from the author(s) during the evaluation process.

6. The author(s) must have a document showing that the rights of use of the data used, the permissions related to the research/analysis or the approvals of the participants they have researched have been obtained.

7. The author(s) has the right and obligation to contact and cooperate with the editor and/or editorial board for information, correction or withdrawal procedures in the event that he/she discovers an error related to the study during the evaluation or early appearance phase.

8. The author(s) should upload the document showing that ethics committee approval (ethics committee name, decision date/number specified on the first or last page of the article or ethics committee decision specified in the method section) has been obtained for the studies requiring data collection by quantitative or qualitative methods such as experiments, questionnaires, scales, interviews, and observations.

9. The papers presented in scientific meetings can be proposed to be published as articles in the Journal of Architecture by expanding their contents. If the article has previously been presented anywhere as a paper, thesis, etc., or prepared by using project/research support (the study that is the basis of the article, by which persons/institutions it is supported), it should be stated in the ‘Thank you and Information Note’ section of the journal writing format.

10. The author(s) should avoid bias, general opinion, slang, dominant culture and cultural assumptions in the text.

11. The author(s) must respond to the assessments of the reviewers in a timely manner.

ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF EDITORS, DEPUTY EDITORS AND FIELD EDITORS
1. Editors are neutral. Referees should endeavor to meet the information, skills and experience needs of the author(s), researcher, practitioner and reader, to give feedback when necessary, and to act in accordance with the principles of clarity on issues that require correction and explanation in the publication process.

2. When deciding on the publication of articles, editors take care that the articles are original and contribute to scientific field publication, readers, researchers and practitioners.

3. Editors evaluate the original value of the studies, their contribution to the field, the validity and reliability of the research method, the clarity of the narrative and the purpose and scope of the journal.

4. Editors take the applied studies into the preliminary evaluation stage by the editorial board, take into account the arbitrator's suggestions and do not change the decisions made by the previous editor(s) unless necessary.

5. The editors implement the bilateral blind refereeing and evaluation process policies that are among the publication policies of the journal, keep the identity information of the referees confidential, and ensure that the impartial and timely evaluation process of each article is completed.

6. Editors provide the authors with descriptive and informative notifications and returns.

7. Editors submit the articles taking into account the field of expertise of the editors and referees, and support the impartial and independent evaluation.

8. Editors provide the information and guidance that the reviewers will need during the evaluation phase.

9. The editors guarantee the independent and impartial completion of the publication process of the works, taking into account whether there is a conflict of interest - unity - between the editors, referees and the author(s) for the impartial evaluation of the article.

10. Editors ensure that the referee pool is inclusive and continuously improve it.

11. Editors block unscientific assessments that do not follow academic etiquette.

12. Editors ensure that journal publishing processes are operated in accordance with publication policies and guidelines, keep them informed of developments in publication policies in the process and prepare training programs when necessary.

13. Editors communicate effectively with everyone involved in the publishing process and hold meetings at regular intervals for the development of publishing policies and journal.

14. Editors are responsible for publishing each article published in the journal in accordance with journal publishing policies and international standards.

15. Editors ensure the protection of personal data in the studies evaluated, and protect the individual data of the author, referee and readers.

16. Editors are obliged to ensure the protection of human and animal rights in the studies evaluated. They care about documenting the explicit consent of the participants in the studies and are obliged to refuse to work if they do not have permissions in experimental research where ethics committee approval is required for the participants of the study.

17. In case of complaints about abuse of office, editors make an objective investigation and share the relevant findings.

18. Editors ensure that judgments containing errors, inconsistencies or misleading in the works are corrected.

19. Editors protect the intellectual property rights of published articles, defend the rights of the journal and the author(s) in case of infringement. They also take the necessary measures to ensure that the content of the published articles does not infringe the intellectual property rights of other publications.

20. Editors take into account consistent criticism of the studies published in the journal, and give the right to respond to the author(s) of the criticized articles.

21. Editors are obliged to examine the complaints from the author, referee or readers and make the necessary explanations.

ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF REFEREES
In the article evaluation process of KARESİ Architecture Journal, the principle of double-sided blind refereeing is applied, which the author(s) do not know the referees and vice versa. Referees cannot communicate directly with the authors; the article evaluation forms and the notes and correction requests specified on the text are forwarded to the author(s) through the journal management system. In this context, referees who will evaluate the articles applied to Karesi Mimarlık Journal should bear the following ethical responsibilities:

1. Only agree to evaluate articles related to his/her area of expertise.

2. It must be impartial and conduct objective and scientific evaluation in confidentiality.

3. In accordance with the principle of confidentiality, they should destroy the studies they examine after the evaluation process, but use them after they are published.

4. The evaluation should be made objectively only in relation to the content of the study; issues such as nationality, gender, religious belief, political opinion and commercial anxiety should not impair the impartiality of the evaluation.

5. When they understand that there is a conflict of interest/unity in the evaluation process, they should inform the editors by refusing to review the study.

6. Make constructive criticisms in accordance with academic etiquette and avoid personal comments involving insults and hostility.

7. They should evaluate the article they have agreed to evaluate within the deadline.

8. Inform the Editor(s)of any suspected ethical violations.

PUBLICATION POLICY
KARESİ Journal of Architecture uses the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ/https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/). Transparency principles are taken as a reference in scientific publishing. In accordance with the publication policy, the content of the journal can be accessed online at no charge. Karesi Journal of Architecture does not charge any product processing fee and article submission fee. Anyone can view and download articles in PDF format from the journal's web page.

It is a common-periodical publication and is published twice a year.
As the evaluation process and period after uploading an article to the Karesi-Architecture Journal system;

1. Pre-Check (4 to 6 weeks),

2. Evaluation (10 to 14 weeks)

3. Layout arrangements (4 weeks) is carried out in 3 stages and in a total of at least 24 weeks.

However, all these processes may vary depending on the intensity. The studies uploaded to the system can only be withdrawn by the authors in the preliminary control processes.

Disclaimer
The authors are responsible for the publications published in KARESİ Architecture Journal. Any committee of the journal is not responsible for the opinions and opinions contained in the published articles.

Copyrights
During the article submission phase, a publication agreement is signed between the author(s) and Karesi Journal of Architecture. This agreement grants the copyrights of the published article to the author(s), completes the ‘Copyright Transfer Form' in the journal system and transfers the publication rights and all related privileges to Karesi Journal of Architecture.

Notifying the Editor of the Situation that does not comply with the Ethical Principles
In the event of a behavior that does not comply with the ethical principles related to editors, referees, authors; or an unethical situation related to an article in the evaluation process, preliminary evaluation or published, the journal should be notified by e-mail provided in the web address.

Plagiarism Assessment Process
The authors are responsible for the content of their work and must adhere to the principles presented under the title of ethical responsibilities of the authors. The submitted studies are checked by the authors for plagiarism with iThentcate ® (Plagiarism Detection Software) and similar programs (excluding resources). Studies with a similarity rate of more than 20% are rejected by the journal editorial board.

Editor in Chief/General Director [en]

SP

Serkan PALABIYIK

Architectural Design, Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

Co-Editors

Fatma Süphan SOMALI

Urban Policy, City and Regional Planning

NA

Nihal Arda AKYILDIZ

Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Urban Morphology, Architecture, Universal and Unobstructed Design, Cultural and Natural Heritage

Field Editors

Fatma Süphan SOMALI

Urban Policy, City and Regional Planning

YY

Yusuf YILDIZ

Sustainable Architecture

Figen ALTINER

Ecology, Sustainability and Energy, Land Use and Environmental Planning, Landscape Architecture, Landscape Planning, Environmental Engineering

Language Editor

DG

Deniz Fevziye GÜNDOĞDU ÖZALP

Urban History, Architectural Heritage and Conservation, Protection, Restoration and Repair in Buildings, Environment, Habitation and Products

Fatma Süphan SOMALI

Urban Policy, City and Regional Planning

Technical Editors [en]

DD

Derya DEMIRCAN

Built Environment and Design, Architectural Design, Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

EA

Elif ALKILINÇ

Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

Araf Öykü TÜRKEN

Participation and Governance, City and Regional Planning

Publication Board

NA

Nihal Arda AKYILDIZ

Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Urban Morphology, Architecture, Universal and Unobstructed Design, Cultural and Natural Heritage

TG

Türkan GÖKSAL ÖZBALTA

Architectural Science and Technology, Sustainable Architecture, Physical Environment Control

Mİ

Mustafa Emre İLAL

Architectural Science and Technology, Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

SP

Serkan PALABIYIK

Architectural Design, Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

YY

Yusuf YILDIZ

Sustainable Architecture

Board of Scientific Advisors

TG

Türkan GÖKSAL ÖZBALTA

Architectural Science and Technology, Sustainable Architecture, Physical Environment Control

BG

Benay GÜRSOY

Architectural Science and Technology

XR

Xavier ROMÃO

Civil Geotechnical Engineering, Civil Construction Engineering, Structural Engineering

PH

Piraye HACIGUZELLER

Classical Greek and Roman History

Binumol TOM

Architecture for Disaster Relief, Architectural Heritage and Conservation, Architectural History, Theory and Criticism, Sustainable Architecture, Aesthetics in Architecture

HG

Hüsnü Murat GÜNAYDIN

Project and Production Management

GK

Gül KOÇLAR ORAL

Sustainable Architecture, Building Physics

Mİ

Mustafa Emre İLAL

Architectural Science and Technology, Information Technologies in Architecture and Design

USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN

HARRAN'DA SULAMA İŞLETMESİ MODELLERİNE İLİŞKİN KULLANICI TERCİHLERİ

Abstract

Keywords

USER PREFERENCES FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT MODELS IN HARRAN

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Author Guidelines

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Price Policy

Indexes

Other Indexes

Journal Boards

Editor in Chief/General Director [en]

Co-Editors

Field Editors

Language Editor

Technical Editors [en]

Publication Board

Board of Scientific Advisors