Translation
BibTex RIS Cite

İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ

Year 2024, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 273 - 308, 05.06.2024

Translator: Melisa Aydin Yamakoğlu

https://doi.org/10.62124/kluhfd.1483970

Abstract

Bu çalışma anayasa yapım süreçlerinin kapsayıcılığı bakımından önem taşıyan Güney Afrika Anayasası yapım sürecine ilişkin olarak Jeremy Sarkin tarafından yazılmış olan “The Drafting of the Final South African Constitution from a Human Rights Perspective”, makalesinin türkçeye çevrilmiş halidir. Makalede anayasa yapım süreci insan hakları açısından ele alınmış ve yeni anayasal düzenin Apartheid sonrası Güney Afrika'nın demokratikleşmesine ve insan haklarının korunması ve geliştirilmesine katkısı değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çeviride konunun Türk öğretisine katkı sunması amaçlanmaktadır.

Keywords

Anayasa Yapım Süreci İnsan Hakları Açısından Güney Afrika Anayasası Güney Afrika Anayasası Yapım Süreci

References

  • ‘3000 demand the return of the death penalty’, The Sunday Independent, 2, October 29, 1995.
  • ‘Dangling the noose’, 141/2 Financial Mail, 1996.
  • ‘Davis-Pityana row cools to a simmer’, 12 (12) Weekly Mail and Guardian 4, March 22-28, 1996.
  • ‘Death penalty vote?’, The Saturday Paper 3, 1995.
  • ‘Excellent results for CA media campaign’, Constitutional Talk ,7, April 22-May 18, 1996.
  • ‘Exodus as rainbow nation’s iridescence fades’, 142 (9) Financial Mail, October 25, 1996.
  • ‘First phase of PPP draws to a close’, Constitutional Talk 1, 7, June 9-29, 1995.
  • ‘Go to hell’, says Barney Pityana, Weekend Argus, 13, March 31, 1996.
  • ‘Independence of the HRC threatened’, Cape Times 2, November 28, 1996.
  • ‘Intellectuals have a role’, The Citizen, March 30, 1996.
  • ‘Judiciary could make a minefield of Constitution’, Business Day 15, May 16 1996.
  • ‘Liberals and racism’, 12 (12) Weekly Mail and Guardian 24, March 22-28, 1996.
  • ‘Mandela signs new constitution into law’, Cape Times 5, December 11, 1996.
  • ‘Nearly 250,000 submissions received’, Constitutional Talk 5, March 8-28, 1996.
  • ‘Parker’s Patch’, The Saturday Paper, 8, March 23, 1996.
  • ‘Public participation kicks off’, Constitutional Talk 1, February 10-23, 1995.
  • ‘Row over racist liberals’, 12 (8), Weekly Mail and Guardian 32, February 23- 29, 1996.
  • ‘SA gaan al dieper wegsink in outokrasie’, Die Burger, 8, August 17, 1996.
  • ‘The death penalty;Will crime stop?’, The Saturday Paper, 11, 1995.
  • ‘The great debate: whites must put up or shut up’, Sunday Times, 15, March 24, 1996.
  • ‘The washer woman, the wimp, and the racial tirade’, The Saturday Paper, March 30, 1996.
  • ‘The working draft reaches millions’, Constitutional Talk 2, February 9-29, 1996.
  • ‘Tougher Bail: Next, Witness Protection’, Weekend Argus, 10, 1995.
  • ‘Towards a new constitution’, Constitutional Talk 1, 3, June 30-August 10, 1995.
  • Barrie G, ‘The public protector: fiat ombudsman’, (1995) September De Rebus 580-583.
  • Carpenter G, ‘Constitutional Court Sounds the Death Knell for Capital Punishment’, (1996) 59 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins Hollandse Reg 145.
  • Cowling M, ‘A Constitutional Right To Bail’, (1996) 1(1) Human Rights and Constitutional Law Journal of Southern Africa 36.
  • Ellish en Andere v. Prokureur-Generaal, Witwatersrand 1994(5) BCLR 1.
  • Ellmann S, ‘The New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division’, (1994) 26 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 5.
  • Executive Council of the Western Cape Legislature and Others and Others v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others CCT/27/95: 1995 (4) SA 877 (CC); 1995 (10) BCLR 1289 (CC).
  • Güney Afrika Cumhuriyeti Anayasası’nın Düzeltilmiş Metninin Onay Süreci 1996 CCT 37/96.
  • Hogg PW, Constitutional Law of Canada (3rd ed., 1992).
  • Kurucu Meclis Başkanı’nın gıyabında; Güney Afrika Anayasası’nın Yeniden Onaylanması Kararı, 1996 (10) BCLR 1253(CC).
  • KwaZulu-Natal Bölge Anayasası’nın Onaylanması Hakkında Karar, 1996 (11) BCLR 1419 (CC).
  • Leon P, ‘Nanny or Watchman-the role of the Bill of Rights Under South Africa’s Final Constitution’, (1996) July De Rebus 461-464.
  • Maduna PM, ‘The Death Penalty and Human Rights’, (1995) 12 South African Journal of Human Rights 193-213.
  • Milton J, ‘Demise of the Death Penalty: The Constitutional Court Pronounces’, (1995) 8 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 188-204.
  • Mokgatle D.D, ‘The Exclusion of Blacks from the South African Judicial System’, (1987) 3 South African Journal on Human Rights 44.
  • Murphy WF ve Tanenhaus J, Comparative Constitutional Law Cases and Commentaries (New York, 1977).
  • Mutua M, ‘Hope and Despair for a New South Africa, The Limits of Rights Discourse’, (1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Journal 63, 80.
  • Premier of KwaZulu-Ntatal and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others CCT/36/95; 1995 (12) BCLR 1561 (CC) (1579).
  • Pretorius R, ‘Enforcement mechanisms in the 1993 Constitution’, (1994) 9 South African Public Law 273, 274.
  • Russell PH., ‘The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, (1983) 61(1) Canadian Bar Review 30.
  • S v. Makwanyane 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC) ve 1995 (3) SA :391 (CC).
  • Sarkin J ve Varney H, ‘Traditional Weapons, Cultural Expediency and the Political Conflict in South Africa: A Culture of Weapons and a Culture of Violence’, (1993) 6 South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 2.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Abortion and the Courts’, (1995) The Constitution of South Africa From a Gender Perspective, eds. S. Liebenberg, 217 (‘Abortion and the Courts’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Can South Africa Afford Justice? The Need and Future of a Public Defender System’, (1993) 4 Stellenbosch Law Review 261.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Choice of Commissioners is Crucial’, (1995) May 22, Cape Times. Sarkin J, ‘Health’, (1996) 7 The South African Human Rights Yearbook 115.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Innovations in the Interim and 1996 South African Constitutions’, (1998) June The Review 57.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Panic Over Crime Could Poison South Africa’, (1996) March Democracy in Action 628 (‘Panic Over Crime’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Preventive Detention in South Africa’, iç Andrew Harding ve John Hatchard (edr) Preventive Detention and Security Law:A Comparative Survey (1993) 209.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Problems and Challenges Facing South Africa’s Constitutional Court: An Evaluation of its Decisions on Capital and Corporal Punishment’, (1996) 113 South African Law Journal 71(‘Problems and Challenges’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Suggestions For A New Abortion Law For South Africa’, (1996) 9 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 125.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Bill of Rights in the Working Draft of the New Constitution: An Evaluation of Aspects of a Constitutional Text Sui Generis’, (1996) 7 (1) Stellenbosch Law Review 12.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Legal Representation: S v. Vermaas and S v. Du Plessis’, (1996) 12 (1) South African Journal on Human Rights 55 (‘S v. Vermaas and S v. Du Plessis’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Development of a Human Rights Culture in South Africa’, (1998) 20 (3) Human Rights Quarterly 628, 644.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of a Constitution and Bill of Rights on Abortion in South Africa: A Comparative Study’, (LLD. Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 1995).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of Constitutional Borrowings on The Drafting of South Africa’s Interim Bill of Rights and the Role Played by Comparative and International Law in the Interpretation of Human Rights Provisions By the Constitutional Court’, (1998-1999) 1 (2) Journal of Constitutional Law 176.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of Patriarchy and Discrimination on Apartheid South Africa’s Abortion Laws’, (1998) 4 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 141.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Human Rights Commission Bill’, (1994) September 7 Cape Times.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Political Role of the South African Constitutional Court’, (1997) 114 South African Law Journal 134 (‘The Political Role’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Trials and Tribulations of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, (1996) 12 (1) South African Journal on Human Rights 617 (‘The Trials and Tribulations’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Why There Should Be an Abortion Clause in the Final Constitution’, (1995) 11 (4) South African Journal of Human Rights 582 (‘Abortion Clause in the Final Constitution’).
  • Varney H ve Sarkin J, ‘Failing to Pierce the Hit Squad Veil: An Analysis of the Malan Trial’, (1997) 10 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 141.
  • Walt AJ, ‘Land reform in South Africa since 1990-an overview’, (1995) 10 South African Public Law 18.
  • Whittle B, ‘The Public Protector, Auditor-General, Public Service Commission and SA Reserve Bank’ (1996) July De Rebus 407.

Year 2024, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 273 - 308, 05.06.2024

Translator: Melisa Aydin Yamakoğlu

https://doi.org/10.62124/kluhfd.1483970

Abstract

References

  • ‘3000 demand the return of the death penalty’, The Sunday Independent, 2, October 29, 1995.
  • ‘Dangling the noose’, 141/2 Financial Mail, 1996.
  • ‘Davis-Pityana row cools to a simmer’, 12 (12) Weekly Mail and Guardian 4, March 22-28, 1996.
  • ‘Death penalty vote?’, The Saturday Paper 3, 1995.
  • ‘Excellent results for CA media campaign’, Constitutional Talk ,7, April 22-May 18, 1996.
  • ‘Exodus as rainbow nation’s iridescence fades’, 142 (9) Financial Mail, October 25, 1996.
  • ‘First phase of PPP draws to a close’, Constitutional Talk 1, 7, June 9-29, 1995.
  • ‘Go to hell’, says Barney Pityana, Weekend Argus, 13, March 31, 1996.
  • ‘Independence of the HRC threatened’, Cape Times 2, November 28, 1996.
  • ‘Intellectuals have a role’, The Citizen, March 30, 1996.
  • ‘Judiciary could make a minefield of Constitution’, Business Day 15, May 16 1996.
  • ‘Liberals and racism’, 12 (12) Weekly Mail and Guardian 24, March 22-28, 1996.
  • ‘Mandela signs new constitution into law’, Cape Times 5, December 11, 1996.
  • ‘Nearly 250,000 submissions received’, Constitutional Talk 5, March 8-28, 1996.
  • ‘Parker’s Patch’, The Saturday Paper, 8, March 23, 1996.
  • ‘Public participation kicks off’, Constitutional Talk 1, February 10-23, 1995.
  • ‘Row over racist liberals’, 12 (8), Weekly Mail and Guardian 32, February 23- 29, 1996.
  • ‘SA gaan al dieper wegsink in outokrasie’, Die Burger, 8, August 17, 1996.
  • ‘The death penalty;Will crime stop?’, The Saturday Paper, 11, 1995.
  • ‘The great debate: whites must put up or shut up’, Sunday Times, 15, March 24, 1996.
  • ‘The washer woman, the wimp, and the racial tirade’, The Saturday Paper, March 30, 1996.
  • ‘The working draft reaches millions’, Constitutional Talk 2, February 9-29, 1996.
  • ‘Tougher Bail: Next, Witness Protection’, Weekend Argus, 10, 1995.
  • ‘Towards a new constitution’, Constitutional Talk 1, 3, June 30-August 10, 1995.
  • Barrie G, ‘The public protector: fiat ombudsman’, (1995) September De Rebus 580-583.
  • Carpenter G, ‘Constitutional Court Sounds the Death Knell for Capital Punishment’, (1996) 59 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins Hollandse Reg 145.
  • Cowling M, ‘A Constitutional Right To Bail’, (1996) 1(1) Human Rights and Constitutional Law Journal of Southern Africa 36.
  • Ellish en Andere v. Prokureur-Generaal, Witwatersrand 1994(5) BCLR 1.
  • Ellmann S, ‘The New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division’, (1994) 26 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 5.
  • Executive Council of the Western Cape Legislature and Others and Others v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others CCT/27/95: 1995 (4) SA 877 (CC); 1995 (10) BCLR 1289 (CC).
  • Güney Afrika Cumhuriyeti Anayasası’nın Düzeltilmiş Metninin Onay Süreci 1996 CCT 37/96.
  • Hogg PW, Constitutional Law of Canada (3rd ed., 1992).
  • Kurucu Meclis Başkanı’nın gıyabında; Güney Afrika Anayasası’nın Yeniden Onaylanması Kararı, 1996 (10) BCLR 1253(CC).
  • KwaZulu-Natal Bölge Anayasası’nın Onaylanması Hakkında Karar, 1996 (11) BCLR 1419 (CC).
  • Leon P, ‘Nanny or Watchman-the role of the Bill of Rights Under South Africa’s Final Constitution’, (1996) July De Rebus 461-464.
  • Maduna PM, ‘The Death Penalty and Human Rights’, (1995) 12 South African Journal of Human Rights 193-213.
  • Milton J, ‘Demise of the Death Penalty: The Constitutional Court Pronounces’, (1995) 8 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 188-204.
  • Mokgatle D.D, ‘The Exclusion of Blacks from the South African Judicial System’, (1987) 3 South African Journal on Human Rights 44.
  • Murphy WF ve Tanenhaus J, Comparative Constitutional Law Cases and Commentaries (New York, 1977).
  • Mutua M, ‘Hope and Despair for a New South Africa, The Limits of Rights Discourse’, (1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Journal 63, 80.
  • Premier of KwaZulu-Ntatal and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others CCT/36/95; 1995 (12) BCLR 1561 (CC) (1579).
  • Pretorius R, ‘Enforcement mechanisms in the 1993 Constitution’, (1994) 9 South African Public Law 273, 274.
  • Russell PH., ‘The Political Purposes of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, (1983) 61(1) Canadian Bar Review 30.
  • S v. Makwanyane 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC) ve 1995 (3) SA :391 (CC).
  • Sarkin J ve Varney H, ‘Traditional Weapons, Cultural Expediency and the Political Conflict in South Africa: A Culture of Weapons and a Culture of Violence’, (1993) 6 South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 2.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Abortion and the Courts’, (1995) The Constitution of South Africa From a Gender Perspective, eds. S. Liebenberg, 217 (‘Abortion and the Courts’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Can South Africa Afford Justice? The Need and Future of a Public Defender System’, (1993) 4 Stellenbosch Law Review 261.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Choice of Commissioners is Crucial’, (1995) May 22, Cape Times. Sarkin J, ‘Health’, (1996) 7 The South African Human Rights Yearbook 115.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Innovations in the Interim and 1996 South African Constitutions’, (1998) June The Review 57.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Panic Over Crime Could Poison South Africa’, (1996) March Democracy in Action 628 (‘Panic Over Crime’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Preventive Detention in South Africa’, iç Andrew Harding ve John Hatchard (edr) Preventive Detention and Security Law:A Comparative Survey (1993) 209.
  • Sarkin J, ‘Problems and Challenges Facing South Africa’s Constitutional Court: An Evaluation of its Decisions on Capital and Corporal Punishment’, (1996) 113 South African Law Journal 71(‘Problems and Challenges’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Suggestions For A New Abortion Law For South Africa’, (1996) 9 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 125.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Bill of Rights in the Working Draft of the New Constitution: An Evaluation of Aspects of a Constitutional Text Sui Generis’, (1996) 7 (1) Stellenbosch Law Review 12.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Legal Representation: S v. Vermaas and S v. Du Plessis’, (1996) 12 (1) South African Journal on Human Rights 55 (‘S v. Vermaas and S v. Du Plessis’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Development of a Human Rights Culture in South Africa’, (1998) 20 (3) Human Rights Quarterly 628, 644.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of a Constitution and Bill of Rights on Abortion in South Africa: A Comparative Study’, (LLD. Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 1995).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of Constitutional Borrowings on The Drafting of South Africa’s Interim Bill of Rights and the Role Played by Comparative and International Law in the Interpretation of Human Rights Provisions By the Constitutional Court’, (1998-1999) 1 (2) Journal of Constitutional Law 176.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Effect of Patriarchy and Discrimination on Apartheid South Africa’s Abortion Laws’, (1998) 4 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 141.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Human Rights Commission Bill’, (1994) September 7 Cape Times.
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Political Role of the South African Constitutional Court’, (1997) 114 South African Law Journal 134 (‘The Political Role’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘The Trials and Tribulations of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, (1996) 12 (1) South African Journal on Human Rights 617 (‘The Trials and Tribulations’).
  • Sarkin J, ‘Why There Should Be an Abortion Clause in the Final Constitution’, (1995) 11 (4) South African Journal of Human Rights 582 (‘Abortion Clause in the Final Constitution’).
  • Varney H ve Sarkin J, ‘Failing to Pierce the Hit Squad Veil: An Analysis of the Malan Trial’, (1997) 10 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 141.
  • Walt AJ, ‘Land reform in South Africa since 1990-an overview’, (1995) 10 South African Public Law 18.
  • Whittle B, ‘The Public Protector, Auditor-General, Public Service Commission and SA Reserve Bank’ (1996) July De Rebus 407.
There are 66 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Law in Context (Other)
Journal Section Çeviri
Translators

Melisa Aydin Yamakoğlu 0000-0003-0616-5028

Early Pub Date June 2, 2024
Publication Date June 5, 2024
Submission Date May 14, 2024
Acceptance Date May 21, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ (M. Aydin Yamakoğlu, Trans.). (2024). Kırklareli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 273-308. https://doi.org/10.62124/kluhfd.1483970
AMA İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ. KLÜHFD. June 2024;2(1):273-308. doi:10.62124/kluhfd.1483970
Chicago Aydin Yamakoğlu, Melisa, trans. “İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ”. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2, no. 1 (June 2024): 273-308. https://doi.org/10.62124/kluhfd.1483970.
EndNote (June 1, 2024) İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2 1 273–308.
IEEE M. Aydin Yamakoğlu, Tran., “İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ”, KLÜHFD, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 273–308, 2024, doi: 10.62124/kluhfd.1483970.
ISNAD , trans.Aydin Yamakoğlu, Melisa. “İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ”. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2/1 (June 2024), 273-308. https://doi.org/10.62124/kluhfd.1483970.
JAMA İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ. KLÜHFD. 2024;2:273–308.
MLA Aydin Yamakoğlu, Melisa, translator. “İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ”. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 1, 2024, pp. 273-08, doi:10.62124/kluhfd.1483970.
Vancouver İNSAN HAKLARI AÇISINDAN GÜNEY AFRİKA NİHAİ ANAYASASI’NIN YAPIM SÜRECİ. KLÜHFD. 2024;2(1):273-308.
 Download Cover Image